[identity profile] rasilio.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
As this article argues...

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/05/osama_bin_laden_0?fsrc=scn/fb/wl//bl/whatthismeansfor2012


Osama Bin Laden's death pretty much ends any chance any of the Tea Party candidates have of beating Obama. Even though any serious analysis would conclude that Obama's death is better for image than substance in any war on terror one of the main thrusts all of the arch conservatives could have thrown at Obama and had it stick was his ineffectual prosecution of the war on terror.

In less than a week he's ended speculation on his place of birth (never should have been an issue but it was) and secured his place as the President who brought down Obama, and more than likely he'll be successful in portraying himself as the President who won in Iraq as well.

That just leaves one issue people can really attack him on, the economy. Here there is very good ground for attacking him the problem is the Bachman's, Gingrich's, and Palin's of the world have never been able to successfully make those attacks because it is clear that fiscal issues are not their prime concern.

I won't say that this guarantees a second Obama term, there is plenty of time left between now and the election for pretty much anything to happen, however this should be the final nail in the coffin of the arch conservative Republicrat Presidential Candidates.

Funny thing is this still leaves the Republicrat's with their best chances at beating Obama with the 3 declared candidates who have the least chance of winning the nomination (Paul, Johnson, or Cain)

In the long run though this may be the single best thing to come out of Osama's death, killing off the candidacy of the most conservative members of the Republicrat party and leaving some smidgen of a chance that a fiscally conservative and socially moderate to liberal candidate winning the nomination.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blorky.livejournal.com
"That just leaves one issue people can really attack him on, " Civil liberties?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] spaz-own-joo.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blorky.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:42 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 23:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
This mistake is so omnipresent it's ceasing to be funny. I think we can let Ras slide on this one, it's not like he's an intern at FOX.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bex.livejournal.com
Even though any serious analysis would conclude that Obama's death is better for image than substance...

secured his place as the President who brought down Obama...

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capthek.livejournal.com
I just made a post on my lj saying that people need to stick to saying Bin Laden because they keep on making this stupid error, and look what happens.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bex.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bex.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bex.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 20:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] capthek.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 19:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 20:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Even though any serious analysis would conclude that Obama's death.


Better correct that, unless you want an FBI visit.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spaz-own-joo.livejournal.com
Even though any serious analysis would conclude that Obama's death is better for image than substance

c'mon, I expect these kinds of lax editorial standards on Fox News but not on Livejournal

"it's the economy, stupid"

Date: 2/5/11 19:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debergerac.livejournal.com
bin laden's death will be old news in a month. obama's achilles heel was, is and will be the economy.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jonathankorman.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 22:02 (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
In less than a week he's ended speculation on his place of birth (never should have been an issue but it was) and secured his place as the President who brought down Obama...

I can't wait for THAT President! :)

(And I'm talking in political terms, not in terms of mortality, children)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dukexmachismo.livejournal.com - Date: 2/5/11 20:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] st-rev.livejournal.com
I think you're misusing 'republicrat (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republicrat)' here.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
I stopped paying attention after the 618th time he used that. Took me a while, I know.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
Given what you've written in the various threads herein I'd advise an edit.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anyusa0030.livejournal.com
on the your first paragraph i think you meant osama's death not obama's .you wrote"conclude that Obama's death is better for image than substance "

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 19:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
Is this seriously that transformative?

I just... don't see it. Yes, Obama gave the order to have bin Laden taken out. Whatever. He's gone. I don't think I've ever really been afraid that OBL was still out there in years. It's a good thing that it happened, but the idea that it's an auto-win for Obama in 2012. The split between Dems and Repubs over the past term hasn't been about national security anyway - Obama's been pretty hawkish all told, and continued the Bush terror policies largely unchanged. 2012 will be a campaign of spreadsheets and social issues, and bin Laden's death changes none of that.

I still think people will vote based on the economy, because they almost always do. It's the nature of the thing.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 20:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Pretty much. If this election becomes a national security election next year, and if we get to that point, Obama's going to win or lose based on his national security credentials then, not a long-time-coming killing now.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 20:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
The best chance for overturning Obama at this point is probably the liberal vote.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 20:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
And Republican efforts at curbing voter turnout via revamping voter registration laws in several swing states (e.g. Ohio, Florida, Michigan). Florida tried that in 2006, and a court threw out that law for good reason(s).
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
...am i the only one left who kind of wishes that, when something happens that's good for America, we can just enjoy it as opposed to immediately politicizing it?
From: [identity profile] montecristo.livejournal.com
If you want to drink the Kool-Aid after so many people have fallen over after drinking prior batches of it, and despite how suspicious this particular batch looks, then by all means, help yourself.

(no subject)

Date: 2/5/11 22:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com
osamabamadingdong


wut?

(no subject)

Date: 3/5/11 00:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueduck37.livejournal.com
Umm, why are you making NO effort to fix your Obama/Osama 'typo'?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blueduck37.livejournal.com - Date: 3/5/11 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com - Date: 3/5/11 12:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com - Date: 3/5/11 14:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 3/5/11 22:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 3/5/11 03:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
This is a good time for a true Progressive Party to come up. The Republicans can all become Democrats (they Democrats basically are Republicans now anyway) and whatever's left can form this new party that stands for improving America instead of selling our country to corporations.

TYPO in your OP

Date: 3/5/11 06:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com
"Even though any serious analysis would conclude that Obama's death is better for image"


You might want to change that...

(no subject)

Date: 3/5/11 09:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ccr1138.livejournal.com
I think you've not yet realized that the Tea Party stands for an ideology regarding fiscal policy, nothing more. Obama's embarrassing ineptitude with foreign policy has no bearing.

Obama's death is better for image than substance in any war on terror

Freudian slip? :P

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 7/5/11 08:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 3/5/11 14:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Bush I won an Iraq War and economic weakness prevented him from being re-elected. It's not a shoe-in.....

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021 222324
25262728293031