Sarah Palin's chances of winning the 2012 presidential election are now, effectively, zero, not that they'd ever been high. There's still an outside chance that she could win the nomination, although I doubt it, but I'd bet a lot of money with really lousy odds against her winning the election. I think it was pretty clear that she was far too divisive after she seriously damaged the GOP's efforts to win the Senate in the midterms while suffering the humiliation of having her handpicked candidate lose to a write in GOP candidate in her home state. That showed us that her "base strengthening" strategies don't scale at all to a more general election.
But she really hurt herself in the Loughner aftermath. She expressed "condolences" to Giffords' family despite the fact that Giffords didn't die, suggesting an almost casual indifference and a going through the motions. Then her team came up with this silly "they were just surveyor symbols" argument, despite the clear intended meaning. And finally, her petulant, defensive offputting "blood libel" defense will put to rest any thoughts that she might recover this thing intact.
A leader's primary concern and focus would have been on the families of the victim and actions that could be taken to prevent such tragedies in the future. I was never particularly troubled by the target-reload talk, that was far different than the explicit appeal to "second amendment remedies", but I found her responses incredibly offensive. I'm glad that she's been revealed for the classless, self-centered mindless partisan politician that she is. She cares nothing for America, and everything for her career.
But she really hurt herself in the Loughner aftermath. She expressed "condolences" to Giffords' family despite the fact that Giffords didn't die, suggesting an almost casual indifference and a going through the motions. Then her team came up with this silly "they were just surveyor symbols" argument, despite the clear intended meaning. And finally, her petulant, defensive offputting "blood libel" defense will put to rest any thoughts that she might recover this thing intact.
A leader's primary concern and focus would have been on the families of the victim and actions that could be taken to prevent such tragedies in the future. I was never particularly troubled by the target-reload talk, that was far different than the explicit appeal to "second amendment remedies", but I found her responses incredibly offensive. I'm glad that she's been revealed for the classless, self-centered mindless partisan politician that she is. She cares nothing for America, and everything for her career.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 15:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:08 (UTC)No way, say what you want about Sarah's politics, she's wicked hot!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 15:56 (UTC)I'm glad that she's been revealed for the classless, self-centered mindless partisan politician that she is.
Don't forget -- there are plenty of mindless partisan voters out there.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:18 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 15:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:11 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:13 (UTC)They're going to keep getting more and more surreal until we just quit having them altogether.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:20 (UTC)Oh, the political fantasies....
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 20:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/1/11 02:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 16:52 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 19:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:13 (UTC)The right seems to be doubling down. Even Jonah Goldberg, who initially posted a demurral of her use of "blood libel," has now backtracked on that.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:50 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Agreed on all.
Date: 14/1/11 17:29 (UTC)Seeing it cited over and over as the primary example is rather disappointing when there's such a rich vein of examples to mine.
http://mediamatters.org/research/201101130002
http://slacktivist.typepad.com/slacktivist/2009/06/killing-in-the-name-of.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpzeI8sgIHU&feature=player_embedded
http://www.themiracleoflife.org/Circus/Circus.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0a1S-ToTwOA&feature=related
http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/1801/
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/beck-claims-i-dont-use-violent-rheto
http://rightwingnews.com/interviews/anncoulter.php
I could go on and on..
Re: Agreed on all.
Date: 14/1/11 17:53 (UTC)I'dmuch rather wave you fools away from your path..
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:30 (UTC)Although I disagree mightily with her particular politics, it's not they that worry me as much (there are people with ideas just as bad or worse who actually have a chance of being elected) as what her popularity demonstrates about the American electorate.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:42 (UTC)I was with you in the first paragraph because that was always true. This, however, is simply false. Did she hurt herself with this stuff? Maybe, but only with the people who were never in a million years going to vote for her. Your idea of "casual indifference" absolutely didn't fly among the conservative right, or even really the middle, I suspect, given the polling on the rhetorical aspects of this tragedy.
A leader's primary concern and focus would have been on the families of the victim and actions that could be taken to prevent such tragedies in the future. I was never particularly offended by the target-reload talk, that was far different than the explicit appeal to "second amendment remedies", but I found her responses incredibly offensive. I'm glad that she's been revealed for the classless, self-centered mindless partisan politician that she is. She cares nothing for America, and everything for her career.
In other words, she didn't address the points you wanted her to address, so this makes her a "classless, self-centered mindless partisan." Gotcha.
Talking about Sarah Palin is almost completely useless at this point. People are so completely dug in at this point where any information about her is seen entirely through the prism of their previously held beliefs - how many people still think she deleted the "don't retreat, reload" tweet again? - and this is clearly no different.
Her Presidential chances are better than they look (http://tinyurl.com/4nhkldu). I still believe there's little to no chance of her running at all, but if she does and she simply hangs around in the 2nd or 3rd place spot as people drop out? Yeah, she'll have a good chance against a weak President who's just as polarizing as she is. I still don't think she'll run, though, and if you really think people are going to say "Well, I like what I see, but her response to the Loughner shooting was terrible," well, I have a President who was friendly with a guy who participated in numerous domestic terrorist attacks that I'd like to introduce you to sometime.
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 17:55 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:a snapshot in time reported today
From:Re: a snapshot in time reported today
From:Blood libel and you
Date: 14/1/11 17:47 (UTC)Like a classic narcissist, Palin manages to make everything about her and her stridently wrong video proclamations, teleprompter reflection flickering in her glasses, just confirms it.
Re: Blood libel and you
Date: 14/1/11 17:52 (UTC)how ironic, considering the left tried to make this tragedy about her within about 20 minutes of the shots being fired.
Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:"Surveyor Symbols" and other credibility problems
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:And here we go:
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:The problem is that money always talks:
From:Re: The problem is that money always talks:
From:Ever heard of N-word privileges?
From:Re: The problem is that money always talks:
From:Re: The problem is that money always talks:
From:Re: The problem is that money always talks:
From:You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: You're going blow a gasket over this guy.....
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:Re: Blood libel and you
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 18:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 19:11 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 20:17 (UTC)What a bitch!
(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 21:01 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 14/1/11 23:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/1/11 04:38 (UTC)i mean its not like being shot but shes still a victim of that bullshit
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/1/11 01:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/1/11 09:38 (UTC)...at least until one of her more intelligent advisors informed her that that rather than clearing the way to victory, it actually decreases the chance of her preferred candidate winning. Then she might have felt sorry.
(no subject)
Date: 15/1/11 14:23 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: