Washington Post 1/5/11:
A second person denied transplant coverage by Arizona under a state budget cut has died, with this death "most likely" resulting from the coverage reduction, a hospital spokeswoman said Wednesday.
First it was Mark Price. Ever heard the name?
Price was a leukemia patient who died late in November from complications while preparing for a privately-funded bone-marrow transplant. It was provided after Jan Brewer cut off funding for such life-saving transplants. See, Price might have had his transplant early in October, when two potential donors became available, but that was the very day Brewer’s cuts went into effect. He didn't have the cash. Time is critical for leukemia patients, and apparently Price just could not physically afford the delay caused by Brewer’s cuts.
He was 37 years old.

The name of the second victim has not yet been released.
Hope the infinitesimal amount of money “saved” by these deaths is worth it to Brewer and her supporters – especially since Mr. Price left behind a wife who now has to raise six children without a father.
Crossposted from Thoughtcrimes
(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 17:57 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:06 (UTC)Your appeals to emotion, however, are not doing much to help your argument.
(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:25 (UTC)If there is a Webbie for Best Example of Understatement in a Political Discussion Forum I would so put you up for nomination.
(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:28 (UTC)This is not a case of the government "getting involved in things it's not supposed to." It's a case of the government withdrawing from an area it needs to oversee. And the result was that a man died who could have been saved.
I really wonder how Brewer and her people live with themselves.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 8/1/11 02:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:21 (UTC)Could always take your chances in the Natural order of things, Let nature take it's course, it's a damned site cheaper than healthcare systems :)
hell, forget lives, them bankers need your money much more than sick people do, I'll assume your "Victim" was just Joe blogs, unlikely to make those sorts of costs back? Hell if they wanna complain that loudly about it, tell em to pay for their own damned operations in future, then let em see that you get what you pay for!!!
(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:34 (UTC)And saving someone's life just isn't worth it! Right?
vtm: How are we as a people suppose to pay for everyone's needs?
I suggest a system similar to what most other western industrialized countries have, like Canada. They manage to keep their infant mortality rates much lower than ours, and their life expectancy higher.
vtm: Does any country provide unlimited healthcare services?
No. Nor does any country provide unlimited police of fire protection. I don't know of other countries that provide rhinoplasties and boob enhancements free of charge.
But the idea of allowing a transplant patient who would benefit from the procedure to die because he can't afford it seems to be a rather uniquely American viewpoint among other western industrialized nations.
You do grasp, don't you, that a transplant is not "optional" surgery for many patients? That it's the only way they have a shot at surviving?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:If it only saves one life ...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 18:35 (UTC)Right?
right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:Re: right?
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 19:28 (UTC)Interestingly enough, the cost of illegal immigration in Arizona is almost exactly that of the states budget shortfall:
Therefore one might argue that illegal aliens killed Mark Price... or maybe it was the federal government... or leukemia. Seems more so that Mark's death is being politicized for ideological gain. tisk tisk.
(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 19:47 (UTC)Oh please -- FAIR? You're citing FAIR on illegal immigration?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 20:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 21:00 (UTC)Ummmm, yeah, great point. Incidentally, I failed to denounce the guy who robbed a liquor store in my town last week, so I guess I'm shit outta luck if I want to call the police and report a break in in my house? I suppose I'm not allowed to object to any moral shortcoming unless I've objected to all of them, or at least the ones you deem important? Seriously, though, WTF????
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 8/1/11 02:23 (UTC)At the momentit seems you're cherry picking your battles to further your ideology.That's actually one of the ideas they're kicking around as a title for her biography.
(no subject)
From:Paft is a murderer!
Date: 7/1/11 21:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 22:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 22:43 (UTC)$0.00
'How much is a person's life in the similar position as this guy's to you? '
Can his name fit on a bumper sticker?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 22:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/1/11 23:17 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 8/1/11 00:50 (UTC)A limit on spending comes naturally to most things, and there's no evil cartel or corporation that dictates that this is so, but a simple matter of, well matter and resources. What you at a glance seem to be arguing for is the perpetual motion device, something which is for all practical purposes is beyond the human ability to build, yet you seem to desire society to act as if such a device had existed for eons and only selfish boors are standing between it and utopia.
Given the restrictions placed on everyone by reality, prioritizing and choosing who gets what and when, and making decisions based on weighing the cost and likely benefits like this are going to happen. The only thing left to debate is who has the most right to claim those decisions.
Saying that Arizona has 'plenty' of money for this is hand-waiving and disingenuous. Lots of states are either going bankrupt or are on the verge of it. Arizona is among them, and they don't even have the privilege of 'quantitative easing' the way the fed does (as mentioned, a tactic which comes with its own high cost for society if leaned on decade after decade the way we've been going at the national level).
(no subject)
Date: 8/1/11 06:32 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: