[identity profile] futurebird.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
This article is sort of clumsy. It seems like she's about to make the point that far too many of the black women we see in media as examples of beauty are still closer to a Eurocentric beauty model, or they are "anything but African American, slave decent, people like us" (ie. Wek, who is stunning, but looks quite different from most black American woman.)

But, then she stops short of saying that, and gets caught up in her own personal BS. This is easy to do. I do it. I've seen other women do it. In addition the article talks far to much about what black men want-- as if that were the most central issue. She equates the term 'Exotic' with those black women who have a mixture of European and black features-- something that didn't really ring true to me, but maybe we have experienced the word in different ways.

That all said, I think that the still prevalent and powerful Eurocentric/anything but you-people nature of print and popular media can have a damaging impact on the mind of young black girls and boys. It can warp our ideas about beauty no matter what type of sexual or aesthetic preferences we may have. It can influence what black people and people of all races think will be desirable in a partner. We each tell ourselves that our choice of partners is independent social pressures, but looking at population-wide trends suggests otherwise.

The Wrong Kind of Different
As a young girl in a mostly white environment I never thought of myself as exotic or special. There was a girl who moved to our suburb from Iraq and she was very exotic and special in the eyes of my peers. Now in my 8-year-old mind that was very enviable! I wished I could be exotic in that way. I knew nothing of the BS and baggage that my Iraq-born peer must have been facing-- to my mind it was like being a princess ...to come from a far away place... to be different. It never occurred to me that I was pretty different-- that was the wrong kind of different. I thought I was more plain than everyone else since, in the words of one teacher who thought she was helping "brown is the most common skin tone in the world." How do we internalize all of this by such a tender age? I was not the only young person who felt this way-- it was a view I shared with and learned from my mostly white peers.

Yo' Mama.
She's so, dark, fat, nappy and big lipped. And she's on welfare. Why did the boys, both black and white love these jokes so much? They play a big role in spelling out what a woman should NOT be. My parents deftly blocked some of this, my mom went out of her way to impress upon me that dark skin is beautiful. That darker skin could be more beautiful. I knew enough to say "Hey that's not funny!" when the dark skin or nappy hair jokes came out. Sadly, I also learned that being fat and being on welfare are solely matters of Personal Responsibility(TM). And I had a pretty warped idea of what "fat" meant. My grandma has warped ideas about nappy hair. (she thinks it's gross) I know a black woman who loves her body but hides from the sun like getting a few shades darker would kill her. (do you know many of us are vitamin D deficient?) So, some of these jokes stick to us. In what ways were notions of beauty spelled out for you as a young person?

Solution
We need to see beautiful woman who are dark, fat, black american and nappy. Well, in fact, I see such woman every day. But, I do not see them in media-- and that may seem minor but I think it can have a huge impact. We need to have this beauty publicly identified an affirmed shout it from the rooftops this is what is beautiful, pretty, lovely, elegant. Use these words. Not some other almost there words, like 'curvy' or 'strong.' To correct this kind of thinking you need to go in the opposite direction with equal and opposite force. It's not enough to have one or two such icons... how many thousands of times have you seen a woman who is thin, white, with european features described as beautiful? We don't even notice it any more. It takes time to unlearn. It's not enough to decide that it is true just for ourselves, we need to make it clear for this next generation of girls-- who are bust internalizing most of the same BS we grew up with. Nor is it enough to have a few women here and there who are black but with very european features, or features not common in American black women-- that too sends a negative message. Like the white guys in college who explained to me that black woman are beautiful if they are the "right kid" of black woman. Which brings me to this last point; cultural change may start from within the black community, but this issue (which is only a small part of a larger issue that involves women of all races) is something that people of all races should think about and take up. Just as fighting homophobia is not just work for gay people-- this doesn't get solved unless we all talk about it openly. Demand better media and discover the greater spectrum of beauty.
Page 2 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 00:45 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mijopo.livejournal.com
Yeah, I agree with futurebird that this just trivializes the notion of "beautiful" and is, in fact, incoherent. It's like saying all people are smart or all possessions are valuable. You can't make the claim without effectively changing the meaning of the terms as they are relative notions to some extent. (there can't be beauty without ugliness or value w/o valueless or intelligence w/o lack of intelligence)

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 00:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Why SHOULDN'T we have some fat fashion models, fat women in toothpaste commercials, etc.

Well I think we should go in to a little more complexity.

What I mean is that we shouldn't just accept obesity as 'normal'. I have no problem if there are fashion models who happen to be fat, as long as they're not trying to make it like being overweight is a good thing because it objectively isn't.

As I said in my original post though, it would be nice if we didn't view beauty as a very narrow slice of perfection, you know? But as for fashion models, I'm of no opinion, they're payed to be that narrow slice to sell stuff, I'd rather not have them at all. :P As for toothpaste commercials and all that, I'd be perfectly happy if there we people that were a bit overweight, maybe not the paragon of a beautiful face, etc too. As I said, I think we need to not be so concerned with physical appearance overall.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 01:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
Even I, who has rarely agreed with you, was thinking about how much I missed your posts and hoping you were OK!!!:D

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 01:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
I would go with most, it all boils down to the smile!!!

Re: 2 on what is beautiful

Date: 21/12/10 01:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
So, a healthy weight will be different for different people.

Not according to medical science. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_mass_index

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 01:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
America is a eurocentric culture. Is it really surprising that eurocentric standards will be the most prominent?

And are people still arguing about beauty? It's easily the most subjective thing in the world and not worth arguing over. Some people will like fat, some will like skinny.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 01:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Beauty is subjective. That said I do not find flesh-covered skeletons arousing, and that's what a lot of modern Hollywood/entertainment figures look like. See: Kiesha Knightley and the Olsen Twins as two I'm relatively familiar with. I do not see why people find attractive someone who looks like the Grim Reaper's party girl cousin.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 02:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Seconded

If you can't find something worth admiring you aren't trying hard enough.



(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 03:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrsilence.livejournal.com
I think its great that you want to change the standards of beauty, the question is, how do you realistically intend to achieve it?

I'm not sure you really outline this is a coherent way and I'd like to see you elaborate on this.

Also, are you making a distinction here between aesthetic beauty and sexual attractiveness? I think there is a great deal of conflation here, not necessarily in your post, but in the topic itself whenever it is discussed and we need to be really careful about that.

We need to remember that being sexually attractive is often a powerful reason why something (or someone) can be considered beautiful, and that this type of beauty is not something that is susceptible to persusion, debate or control. You can't argue people into changing their minds if they find something sexually attractive or unattractive, because these emotions come from a part of their brain that doesn't respond to logical arguments.

Personally I don't find the personality of most black women that I have encountered in the media or in real life very attractive. But that doesn't mean I don't think they are beautiful. These are 2 related, but categorically different things.

brown is the most common skin tone in the world

I can understand why hearing that said might make you feel a certain way, but don't you think that if hearing a statement of fact feels hurtful, that the problem is not that the truth is being spoken aloud, but that you're responding to it in an unhelpful way? Isn't there another way you could interpret this kind of statement that would be self-promoting, rather than self-denigrating?

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 03:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
I saw what you did.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 03:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
I like babies.

And puppies.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 03:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
I laughed, and then was ashamed, and then laughed at being ashamed. Good show, sir.

Re: 2 on what is beautiful

Date: 21/12/10 03:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dierdrae.livejournal.com
BMI is a pretty inaccurate way to measure healthy body weights. For one thing, it makes no distinction between weight caused by fat and weight caused by muscle, and muscle weighs more. Professional athletes have been tested to have BMIs that say they're obese, which is just stupid. I agree with the premise that at some point there is a limit to the amount of weight someone can carry and still be healthy, however BMI is not the right tool to calculate what that is.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 03:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
That kid is butt ugly.

Re: 2 on what is beautiful

Date: 21/12/10 04:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
I'm not a doctor, but I think that even if BMI isn't the best gage I'm pretty sure doctors are going to know when someone hits an unhealthy weight. And that's it's best to listen to said doctor even if one is happy with the weight in question.

(no subject)

Date: 21/12/10 04:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
Is it really surprising that Eurocentric standards will be the most prominent?

Not to me.

Of course, since those evil white Europeans invented racism then in some people's books pretty much anything they give the thumbs up to is EVIL.

Re: Oh please.

Date: 21/12/10 04:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
'No it's not. America has been multicultural since its inception--'

Okay, you're right. Like 90% Europe and 10% other places up till the 20th century.
Page 2 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30