![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Creepy, isn't it?
I must have spent close to three hours last night diving into the rabbit hole that are number stations. Why? You can thank a recent episode of Fringe for it, although why the station on Lost didn't get me thinking about it first I have no idea.
Anyway - number stations. For those who have never heard about these, they're shortwave broadcasts that come from often-unknown transmitters that are just what you hear above - typically some sort of identifying sound, tone, or song, followed by a series of numbers. To add to the creep factor, sometimes the numbers are read off by a man, or a robotic voice, or, such as in the video I linked above, the voice of a small child. They're most likely used by spies and government intelligence bureaus (if convictions of spies who had the key is any indication) to transmit messages using one-use codes of some sort, and the genius of it is in the simplicity of it - these broadcasts can be heard by anyone, written down and preserved by anyone, but only the person or people who are supposed to understand the message can because of how they work. It's utterly fascinating.
I gotta say, too - I spent hours reading and listening, and felt like I was doing something wrong. It was really kind of creepy and crazy, and still is. I went to bed last night and dreamed that I was busting a Russian spy ring. Most exciting dream EVER.
So yeah, I'm pretty much obsessed at this point. I found that Archive.org has the entirety of a bunch of recordings, named The Conet Project, which are a blast to listen to (the guy who, er, curated it is profiled here). The liner notes for it are beautiful, too - equal parts informative and conspiracy-nutty. Really great.
So what's the deal here? The best parts are how, for example, the numbers stations amp up during a major crises such as the 1993 USSR coup attempt or when Israel gets into some trouble, or how the Cold War-era stations are still going, or how the Russian stations abruptly switched when the spy ring was busted this past summer.
I honestly don't know if there's a real discussion topic here, to be honest. I thought this was a really interesting piece of history to share, and part of it is still crazy to me.
(no subject)
Date: 30/11/10 23:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/11/10 23:47 (UTC)Screwed up, no?
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/11/10 23:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/11/10 23:53 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:03 (UTC)I didn't pick up on this one when I clicked it last night. THE NAMES MATCH.
Wow.
(no subject)
Date: 30/11/10 23:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:02 (UTC)but I have promises to keep ... :)
Thanks for this, Jeff. You were not the last to know - I heard about this from you. One of the nice things i like about being on the internet.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 00:52 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 01:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 05:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 17:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 01:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 01:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:03 (UTC)I'm guessing that the transmitters being used are akin to the ones that used to be in college dorms for "illegal" radio stations. I had a friend at Cornell that talked about a friend who ran one, and it was a constant challenge to hide it from the FCC, who apparently had gizmos that could track it down.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 01:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 01:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:04 (UTC)I used to listen to radio static to get to sleep until I got an actual 'white noise' generator.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:13 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:15 (UTC)Not that I'm, uh, in the market for one or anything. No. Not me.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:23 (UTC)It's stunning how a) secure and b) nifty it is in the grand scheme of things. It's 2010, and I can put a magical phone that gets the internet onto a pad and it magically charges the battery, but the best way for spies to communicate is to use 100 year old technology.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 09:39 (UTC)lol, the tech for that is nothing new either ;)
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:19 (UTC)I'm glad to have filled your conspiracy tank for a while, though.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:27 (UTC)On the other hand if they see the likes of me as a threat they're wasting time, money, and effort.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 02:31 (UTC)Remote viewers use seemingly random sequences of numbers for target locations.
Just sayin...
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 04:15 (UTC)Might be a 'back-up system' in the event of everything else failing. Cool.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 04:42 (UTC)It warranted capslock.
I never heard of this before, and this is so awesome. Thank you for sharing. Now I'm gonna go spend three hours on it myself..
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 08:14 (UTC)Post is recommended, btw.
(no subject)
Date: 2/12/10 17:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 12:28 (UTC)It doesn't really freak me out at all. I guess I'm jaded enough to realize that all kinds of crazy spy stuff goes on around us all the time.
(no subject)
Date: 1/12/10 14:09 (UTC)I am so going to read up on this.
(no subject)
Date: 2/12/10 13:14 (UTC)