![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
By now, it is hard to escape that President George W. Bush's memoir, "Decision Points" is ready for release, and the former President has been making rounds promoting the book and discussing the work on various talk shows and high profile interviews.
It is equally hard to escape that in the book, he recounts being called a racist by Kanye West as the low point in his eight year Presidency.
Now to be fair, he apparently recounts other times as difficult and confesses to having made mistakes, and to be fair, it is never pleasant to be accused of a personal flaw that you do not believe you have.
But -- seriously? Being dissed by a notoriously loud mouthed musician? Not the actual discovery that New Orleans was drowning? Not the inescapable conclusion that Saddam Hussein had no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction? Not passing any number of milestones in Americans killed in action? Not the attacks of September 11 themselves? Not leaving office with the entire American economy spiralling into the crapper?
I haven't read the book, and I am sure that he must note those are hard times as well, but out of eight years in a highly contentious Presidency, the man stands firm in his interview with Matt Lauer that Kanye West's remarks were THE worse moment.
Is this understandable in a way that I am simply failing to understand or is this just a giant WTF moment for the entire country?
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 19:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 19:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 19:56 (UTC)I harp on this a lot, but I really do think the "you're racist" charge is an awful dead end, both when it's true and when it isn't. The "you're perpetuating a racist phenomenon" charge does a much better job of not devolving instantly, and to boot, it's a claim which lends itself much more readily to corroboration or refutation by actual evidence.
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:49 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 19:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:07 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 21:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 23:29 (UTC)Isn't the one making a claim supposed to back up said claim? Not the respondent?
Like, "When will you stop beating your wife?" - "I've never beaten my wife!" - "Prove it!"
Also, Russell's Teapot.
(no subject)
Date: 10/11/10 03:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:01 (UTC)Of all the ass-chewings I recieved in the service the only one that ever really "shook me" emotionally, was being accused of "Just not giving a shit".
You can think and say what you will about him as president, but as a human being I'm inclined to think he's a lot better than people give him credit for.
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 21:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 20:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 23:20 (UTC)Which makes sense if you think about it. At the local level your victory speech will be delivered to a room loosely filled with people cheering you on. Many of them will be friends and people you know. On the other hand, at the national level you'll be in a stadium full of people projecting their hopes, dreams, and aspirations onto you, all because you can read a mean speech.
It takes a special kind of hubris to be comfortable with that.
(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 23:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/11/10 15:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10/11/10 16:12 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 21:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 22:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9/11/10 23:05 (UTC)a lot better than people give him credit for
Date: 10/11/10 15:36 (UTC)