[identity profile] pantsu.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
(CNSNews.com) - On Wednesday, only two days after he lifted President Bush’s executive order banning federal funding of stem cell research that requires the destruction of human embryos, President Barack Obama signed a law that explicilty bans federal funding of any "research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death."

The provision was buried in the 465-page omnibus appropriations bill that Obama signed Wednesday. Known as the Dickey-Wicker amendment, it has been included in the annual appropriations bill for the Department of Health and Human Services every fiscal year since 1996.

The amendment says, in part: "None of the funds made available in this Act may be used for—(1) the creation of a human embryo or embryos for research purposes; or (2) research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected to risk of injury or death."

sauce




...Wait, what? Not that I'm complaining, but seriously, what the hell?
What do you guys make of this? In b4 the pro-life agenda forced this or any variations thereof.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tu-ne-cedemalis.livejournal.com
It bans federal funding, not research itself. I see no problem with that.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tu-ne-cedemalis.livejournal.com
Well then I don't see the problem. As long as the research itself isn't banned, there's really not a problem.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tu-ne-cedemalis.livejournal.com
My apologies. I thougth you were one of those lefties who was pissed, as is the usual case in these livejournal communities.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] saavedra77.livejournal.com
Sounds like O may have gotten played.

Maybe Congressional Democrats had to include this provision in the spending bill to keep certain conservative Democrats on board?

At any event, once it was baked into the bill, O's only options were to either sign or veto the whole thing.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 05:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
Christ on a crutch this x1000.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 09:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrunkencadence.livejournal.com
You're a genius! I'm not being facetious. Let's start now to get it on the ballet by 2010.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Sounds like Washington is divided against itself. A nation divided into Half Executive, Half Legislative cannot stand, to misquote a certain POTUS Obama claims to follow.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 00:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
I can't find another news source covering this. You'd think it would be fairly news-worthy. I'm calling shenanigans until another source pops up.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 01:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
Assuming it is true, keep in mind the article would have to characterize this as "barring" not "banning".

The funding bill from last year that just got put through bars any money going to embryonic stem cell research. But this is the last funding bill for the previous year's budget -- which wouldn't have had any money for that purpose anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 02:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
They're a right-wing "news" website. Till I see this posted in mainstream media, AND corroborated, I don't believe it.


About Us

The Cybercast News Service was launched on June 16, 1998 as a news source for individuals, news organizations and broadcasters who put a higher premium on balance than spin and seek news that’s ignored or under-reported as a result of media bias by omission.

Study after study by the Media Research Center, the parent organization of CNSNews.com, clearly demonstrate a liberal bias in many news outlets – bias by commission and bias by omission – that results in a frequent double-standard in editorial decisions on what constitutes "news."

In response to these shortcomings, MRC Chairman L. Brent Bozell III founded CNSNews.com in an effort to provide an alternative news source that would cover stories that are subject to the bias of omission and report on other news subject to bias by commission.

CNSNews.com endeavors to fairly present all legitimate sides of a story and debunk popular, albeit incorrect, myths about cultural and policy issues.

CNSNews.com has a full staff of credentialed journalists at its world headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, staffs full time news bureaus in Jerusalem and the Pacific Rim, and works with credentialed correspondents in London, Paris, Moscow and Nairobi. In addition to news, CNSNews.com is proud to present a full slate of commentaries by some of the brightest minds and sharpest wits in the nation, and a full stable of cartoonists to provide you with a morning political chuckle.

CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center, a not-for-profit 501 (c)(3) organization. Like National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting System, CNSNews.com is able to provide its services and information to the public at no cost, thanks to the generous support of our thousands of donors and their tax-deductible contributions. However, unlike NPR or PBS, CNSNews.com does not accept any federal tax money for its operations.


(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 05:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] squidb0i.livejournal.com
I noticed this too.
I don't buy it.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 10:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
Oh it may very well be true, but they're misrepresenting.

The article trips itself up -- the "ban" would actually be a "bar" on money in that spending bill. But the bill is the last one to fund the PREVIOUS budget -- which wouldn't have any stem cell funding anyway.

(no subject)

Date: 14/3/09 15:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dwer.livejournal.com
Hmm. I guess you're right -- this is a delayed bill, isn't it. Should have been passed months ago

I think we're all bozos on this omnibus

Date: 14/3/09 23:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
There is the bright side of signing the bill without making hay of a jackass amendment.

(no subject)

Date: 15/3/09 02:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowyphantom.livejournal.com
*blinks*

Obama, what the f*** ...?
Either this is an early April Fools' joke, or he's just raising righties' hopes up, only to flip-flop again.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

April 2026

M T W T F S S
   12 345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930