![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, June 27, 2010:
Our law enforcement agencies have found bodies in the desert either buried or just lying out there that have been beheaded.
Christina Boomer to Jan Brewer, September 1, 2010:
Why wouldn’t you recant the comments you made earlier about the beheadings in the desert?
A CNN ticker headline refers to Brewer’s repeated claim tying illegal immigration to desert beheadings as a “quip,” as in, “’Beheading’ quip plagues gov.” This makes it sound as though poor Jan Brewer is being hounded for some off-the-cuff remark she made just once, in jest. As these clips show, it was a bit more than that.
Brewer’s reaction to the questions in the second clip is classic in that she appears to truly consider herself very hard done by. It’s as if she thinks it unfair for anyone to treat words as if they should bear any relation to facts. Those lousy liberal reporters are playing dirty pool by asking her to either back up what she's said or retract it!
The reality-based moonbats have struck again!
This has been a growing trend on the right, especially online. Watching the second clip, I half expected Brewer to burst out with "read what I said," or "look it up yourself!" or "that's a stoopit question!" or any other standard freeper response. Instead, she skipped over that and cut straight to declaring the press conference closed and flouncing away.
It looks as though, in Arizona and a few other places this next election is going to be a referendum on how many Americans actually feel like they have a stake in the real world. That Internet disconnect with reality which enables someone, in the unreal ether of online life, to declare the sky yellow, may or may not work on people who can look up at the offline sky and see what color it actually is. We'll see.
Crossposted from thoughtcrimes
(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 16:51 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:24 (UTC)This has been a growing trend in general. In a society run by sophists, meaning is secondary to feeling and rhetoric. They're not interested in what they're saying, as much as they are interested in crafting nice sounding phrases and flattering clauses which make people feel self-righteous and put-upon. If you call them on the specifics of their language, they'll just give you a blank look as if you're an alien from Mars who speaks based on what words mean, rather than how they sound. Their use of language simply has an entirely different logic and goal. Don't get tied down with words. They're just placeholders to transmit shared assumptions and feelings. Pretty soon, we'll be able to fully communicate in this manner with little more than waves of hands and grunts and snorts.
(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:32 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:39 (UTC)I agree with you, but the Left started it. :)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:39 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 16:57 (UTC)And I've just had yet another example drop into my lap, with Governor Haley Barbour flat-out lyin' his fool head off about segregation and the south.
No, prominent liberals in this country haven't shown a habit of engaging in this kind of historical revisionism -- possibly because we don't have to.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:28 (UTC)Just gonna throw this out there
Date: 2/9/10 20:30 (UTC)Re: Just gonna throw this out there
Date: 2/9/10 20:40 (UTC)What did you mean, dear?
Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:Re: Just gonna throw this out there
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:35 (UTC)On the other hand this is the movement where Sarah "Troopergate" Palin is a heroine of "impeccable moral quality."
(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 06:50 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:36 (UTC)Obviously, immigration is a problem for border states, and obviously, sans heads or not, people are losing their lives in various endeavors to enter the country illegally.
That is the issue worthy of debate and worthy of a media voice, not some bullshit yakky sensation story about Brewer being unwilling to admit her error - that's nothing, comparatively, that's absolutely nothing.
(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 20:42 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 22:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 23:22 (UTC)Really, I should've seen this coming, but I honestly thought nobody would be THAT batshit crazy.
Silly me.
(no subject)
Date: 2/9/10 23:24 (UTC)She's probably referring to this:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/15/human-head-arizona-fuels-political-debate/
Perhaps Democrats should concentrate on races they can actually win.
(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 17:15 (UTC)"at least one human skull has been found in the Arizona desert in recent years, officials said. But that was in 2008, and no evidence was found that indicated it was the result of a decapitation. Rather, the coroner in the case determined, it was torn from the rest of the body after death -- most likely by a wild animal."
Yeah, who cares if a candidate's lying her fool head off, throwing out inflammatory stories that imply residents in Arizona are in danger of being kidnapped and beheaded out in the desert.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 03:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 19:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 05:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 06:52 (UTC)The reality-based moonbats have struck again!
This has been a growing trend on the right, especially online.
How did you type that without your computer from immediately going BSOD out of sheer irony?
(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 17:18 (UTC)scritch, scritch, scritch...
Now run along.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 08:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3/9/10 17:19 (UTC)