[identity profile] green-man-2010.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
I want to you to take a look at these maps. They show the state of the world and show that in spite of what we see in the media , the fight against endemic world poverty is being won.

The images are big, so behind an LJ cut to save your bandwidth.

First , lets understand IMR - it stands for Infant Mortality Rate.
If you were to look at Britain since the year 2000, you would find that for every 1,000 live births, less than 10 children died before their 1st birthday. Britain has an IMR of under 10.

Now in some countries, the IMR is 50, or even higher. This means that at least 1 child in 20 will die before it's a year old. Worse still, in some countries, the IMR iis 100 or over - in some cases IMrs top 200 - I child in 5 dying before it's first birthday.

Now, this IMR thing is not some random event. it is closely linked to what we call 'endemic poverty'. In the UK, it may be possible to see some homeless people sleeping rough on the streets of London. There are isolated incidents of people falling into poverty. However, for the bigger percentage of the population, things are different. most people have houses. Most, if not all children have shoes, go to school, and eat enough to stay alive.

In other countries, however, most children do not simply lack shoes, they lack homes wiith running water, proper sanitation, the means to go to school- and whole villages are like this. this is what we mean by 'endemic poverrty' poverty being widespread - it's the norm and out of control. In such countries, diseases like malaria are also wide spread, endemic and are delibitating the efforts people make to rise up out of poverty.

So- now we know this, let's take a look at the maps.
the world in 1960 - you can click the image for more detail, but basically, purple = high IMR and green = below 50.

look at how widespread endemic poverty is.
note that Europe and North America are relatively prosperous, but namy areas suffer IMRs well over 50.

1980

more green areas showing up - but still lots of places where work needs doing.
some counties are a darker shade of green - places like this have very low IMRs.

2000

The world seems to be winning the war against endemic poverty.
Any country that goes below 50 tends to stay there - only North Korea, with a communist Military dictatorship seems to have fallen back to being above IMR 50.
most places that have democratic, stable governments are making vast strides. I hope in my lifetime to see the whole world go below IMR 50.

If we change the way that international trade is conducted, if we back the initiatives of the World Health Organiisation, if we can persuade our own politicians to sponsor world health programmes instead of more expensive weapon systems, if we support democratic movements like those in burma and elsewhere against tyrannical regimes, if we educate ourselves on what's happening and how we can get involved - then that is perfectly possible.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 14:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
1. The Green Revolution.

2. The lack of conflict.

3. Advancements in medical and environmental technology.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 15:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com
The green revolution is an interesting one. One of the greater tragedies of the 20th century was misguided environmentalists convincing many countries in Africa to fight against it.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 16:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com
Misguided?

Short term gain has resulted in an increasing loss of arable land globally.

Monoculture techniques are literally raping the planet, and now we're going to see a GM/GE 'revolution'.

Joy :|

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 16:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com
I have no problem with GM and the fact remains that I have plenty of food to eat while places that did not advance don't.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 16:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com
So the idea of a vastly reducing area within which to grow crops does not bother you?

And in relation to 'GM' crops - the idea that a company can own the copyright to any genetic material doesn't make you cringe?

Or that they can create 'activator' genes, that produce either unfruiting or unseeding plants unless 'treated' with an additional activator chemical that can only be bought from Monsanto et al?

Or terminator seeds?

Or cross-pollination? Or genetic contamination?

Or people making mistakes with the genetics and harming thousands if not millions of people?

Or reducing the genetic diversity of our crops making them vulnerable to disease and therefore making us vulnerable to famine?

What is the benefit? That we create plants that rape the soil for twice as many minerals and create deserts twice as fast? Soon they'll be selling trademarked mineral fertilizer. Or soil, even. Where is all of this energy and resource going to come from?

What ever happened to the idea that we have enough food in the world, it's just not distributed fairly? And much of it is wasted.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 17:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com

I have no problem with GM and the fact remains that I have plenty of food to eat while places that did not advance don't.

I don't see GM as an advancement, Though it may well be sold as such, and GM can quickly manupulate a plant to it's final hybrid quicker (If for that matter it was naturaly possible in the first place), don't you think that certain genetic mutations happen naturaly and for a reason? (Gd Dammit I'm starting to sound religious)



(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 22:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 16:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
Ok, stop eating food. These techniques have literally saved over a billion... a BILLION people from starvation. It's allowed the average food footprint per person to drop drastically.

Short term? As if making people suffer today and for the next 50 years with no increase in food production ever so some Malthus worshiper can smugly sit back and proclaim to be right is twisted.

So if you don't like it, then stop eating and we can reallocate your footprint to someone who doesn't want to starve.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 16:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 16:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 16:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 17:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 20:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com - Date: 23/5/10 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 21:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] confliction.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 23:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 16:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
'... industrial developement[sic]'

But it doesn't. You're just tacking it on there.

If someone is living in a hut in the middle of a rain forest whilst living on a subsistence diet and dying at the old age of 40 we're happy but if they're living in a shack next to a factory whilst living on a subsistence diet and dying at the old age of 50 we're outraged.

Hell, you want to know how many lives are saved with industrial advances like electrical power, plumbing, and transportation? We can deify agrarian subsistence living all we want but it'd only drag down poverty and lifestyle.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 15:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com
The dark side of this is that we are winning the fight against child poverty, but not enough attention is paid to making sure these kids grow up with say the chance to get a job and feed themselves as adults. I see plenty of adds on tv to "Save the Children", but none to "Employ the Adults". I think you can make the case that doing the former without the latter is a recipe for unstable societies as the overall result is more population than the economy can handle.

Things like microcredit, fair trade based outsourcing, and training can go a long way, but they tend to get much less funding as adults are not as cute.

Please don't think I am saying that reducing infant mortality is a bad thing. I am only saying that we need to keep that up, and also make sure we engage in aid that helps develop functioning economies that can care for these individuals as adults and provide them with gainful employment (or the ability to form their own businesses).

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 15:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com
Please don't think I am saying that reducing infant mortality is a bad thing. I am only saying that we need to keep that up, and also make sure we engage in aid that helps develop functioning economies that can care for these individuals as adults and provide them with gainful employment (or the ability to form their own businesses).

May I suggest that someone goes out there and asks them exactly what THEY want, instead of treating them like helpless children who haave no say in what is done to "Help" them?


(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 15:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com
Thats why I think microcredit is such a great idea. People come in with ideas which are then supported and funded. People in an area often know what their area needs in terms of new business but generally lack even very small amounts of capital.

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 15:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com

I can't be the only one with the belief microcredit will only encourage capitalist tendencies, this leads to the raping of all known rescourses, government corruption (Of which I feel pretty sure they need no more encouragement)

Me, I say ask them what they need, then send the tools, education (Non-religious), and materials for them to build their own required tools to do whatever they like.

Hell even micro-credit makes a profit (Small though it may be) ad I believe Muslims therefore cannot make good use of that w/o upsetting one of their gods/prophets(I'm not overly well read on the Muslim faith)

Tools, Food, manpower (Plenty of that there already I'd guess, just needs a little organisation.) and materials, when money, arms, even foodstuffs on occasions are sent, it seems to me that corrupt governments (and in a multi-faith country I think some will do badly out of the deal) will deal these out as they see fit and that's not always according to need. It's my opinion you cannot help those who won't help themselves.

I'll guess you live in a pseudo-democratic, capitalist society?, by the time FRB kicks in (Which always does in any capitalist state) do you really think the workers will be any better off in retirement?







(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 16:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 17:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 16:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 22:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 23:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] torpidai.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 17:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 22:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com
I think we need to do both at the same time. Entering a country and dramatically increasing infant survival without corresponding investments in broader issues causes a tremendous amount of suffering.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sgiffy.livejournal.com - Date: 22/5/10 23:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 17:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Well there's certainly less infants dying in places that were formerly high risk for that, but how does that equate to lack of poverty?

(no subject)

Date: 22/5/10 20:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
The changes to international trade that started in the early 80's seem to have brought about a good chunk of the drop in global poverty. Those countries which integrated were the ones that saw large decreases in poverty, those who didn't saw no decreases.

Why would you want to change this? The percentage of people earning less than a dollar a day in 2000ish terms, or about $1.25 today, stayed constant for at least the last two centuries until about 30 years ago. In short, globalization's record for reducing poverty is much better than the record for foreign aid... and is more sustainable.

There's plenty of evidence for this;
http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/162/27754.html
http://global-ejournal.org/2009/03/09/globalization-poverty-reduction-and-economic-rights/

Tyranny as divine will

Date: 22/5/10 23:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
If you oppose tyranny, you will butt heads with the Rednecki doctrine that despotism is divine will. Addressing the ignorance and viciousness that exists in affluent countries will go a long way to assisting people elsewhere.

Re: Tyranny as divine will

Date: 23/5/10 00:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
Oh you and your racist tirades...

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30