![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
One of the great benefits of the internet is that we can see and hear events that never make it as major stories in the major media outlets. It's also a problem -- obscure events can be elevated to become "representative" of entire groups of people without balance or actual analysis. We are constantly asked in the age of internet media to evaluate raw information without knowledge of context or proportionality.
This video, for example, made some rounds on the net a few months back. It purports to show a group of community organizers praying to Obama. The distributor of the video added captions at key points to assist your hearing of the key phrase "Deliver us, Obama".
Pretty damning, isn't it? Now the audio is pretty low quality, but when you watch it and listen it is pretty clear that they ARE offering prayer directly to the President.
Now listen to the video WITHOUT watching it.
If you are being honest, I'm thinking there is a really good chance that you are a lot less sure of what is being said.
So here is a question: how do you approach the supposedly "raw" information we have constant access to via alternative media sources? How much do these sources influence the "mainstream" media and what are the implications for how much even allegedly unbiased orignal source material can be manipulated?
This video, for example, made some rounds on the net a few months back. It purports to show a group of community organizers praying to Obama. The distributor of the video added captions at key points to assist your hearing of the key phrase "Deliver us, Obama".
Pretty damning, isn't it? Now the audio is pretty low quality, but when you watch it and listen it is pretty clear that they ARE offering prayer directly to the President.
Now listen to the video WITHOUT watching it.
If you are being honest, I'm thinking there is a really good chance that you are a lot less sure of what is being said.
So here is a question: how do you approach the supposedly "raw" information we have constant access to via alternative media sources? How much do these sources influence the "mainstream" media and what are the implications for how much even allegedly unbiased orignal source material can be manipulated?
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:35 (UTC)Check out these hymns (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-ZnPE3G_YY)and I reckon most people will hear just what the peculiar subtitles say.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:41 (UTC)Oh wait...
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 12:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:55 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 11:53 (UTC)Pretty damning??? What!? Methinks you've been watching too much Fox News. Asking a leader for assistance, even if done in poetic form, doesn't amount to prayer. And some would contend that alerting the president to one's needs is far more sensible than calling out to some mysterious entity in the sky.
"how do you approach the supposedly "raw" information we have constant access to via alternative media sources?"
The same way I approach any information, I try to understand it and consider it sceptically. The nature of "raw" information varies significantly.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 12:06 (UTC)The question is, how much of what we're manipulated to think of as fact is not, and how does it affect mainstream media?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:Re: And what about the ones who prayed to Shrub?
From:They had no problem blaspheming this way:
From:Re: They had no problem blaspheming this way:
From:Yeah, I know right?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 13:55 (UTC)you're wrong. Obama gives to the needy!
Date: 7/5/10 14:27 (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ib8SxdQIvk - Obama gives a house and car
And unlike praying to white babby jebus praying to Obama works
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3732449
Re: you're wrong. Obama gives to the needy!
From:Re: you're wrong. Obama gives to the needy!
From:Re: you're wrong. Obama gives to the needy!
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:38 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I hold no trademark...
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 14:43 (UTC)Healthcare is the greatest inequality?
Wow powerful stuff.
There's a lot of interesting in this video on a theological/occultic level.
Thank you for brining this to my attention I'm going to use this for another completely relgious debate.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 14:46 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 14:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 15:15 (UTC)(no subject)
From:I prayed for good weather...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 15:24 (UTC)I am of two minds on this. One, prayer can be just a supplication to anyone. People still say things like, "pray, pass me the salt." To "pray" to Obama in this sense is just to be a supplicant. Whether you think it is unecessarily servile for an American citizen to ask a boon of Obama the way you would bow and scrape before a feudal lord is a matter of perception I think. On the other hand, this was done (I am assuming here) by an ordained minister... in vestments. And it was done, as I said, in a liturgical manner that isn't just suplication... it is also worship. That is disturbing. I doubt they meant it like that, since I doubt the person who wrote it had any clear idea about how it would sound to people who actually buy the whole Jesus is the Son of the Living God thing. But as one of those Sky God worshippers I'll tell you, it sounds mighty creepy.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 15:44 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 15:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:06 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:04 (UTC)Your underlying point is true though. It is extremely easy to lead people to a certain perception about a piece of media information, and that is exploited all the time.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:21 (UTC)I heard either Obama, Our Father, Jehovah, and Our God. Even if it were Obama I would not interpret it as praying to Obama as much as using a prayer in a political way.
Regardless I can't see why I should care what some random group of people do. It certainly would not be the craziest thing people have done in prayer.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:27 (UTC)Have *you* met him?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 16:58 (UTC)You would have to be half-deaf or retarded to hear it any other way.
(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 17:47 (UTC)(no subject)
From:Wait, what?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 17:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 17:02 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 17:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 17:10 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 7/5/10 20:28 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:It's not unusual...
Date: 7/5/10 23:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8/5/10 03:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8/5/10 12:49 (UTC)