![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
On "The Daily Show," Jon Stewart relatively soft-pedaled his defense of fellow Comedy Central employees, "South Park's" Matt Stone and Trey Parker, against a group of Muslim critics. Over at HBO this weekend, though, Bill Maher wasn't holding anything back. On his show "Real Time With Bill Maher," the show's every-incendiary host opined during his segment "New Rules:"
"When South Park got threatened last week by Islamists incensed at their depiction of Muhammad, it served -- or should serve -- as a reminder that our culture isn't just different than one that makes death threats to cartoonists. It's better." In his defense of the First Amendment and other Americal civil liberties, Maher -- who made the film "Religulous" -- continued: "The Western world needs to make it clear: Some things about our culture are not negotiable. And can't change. And one of them is freedom of speech, Separation of church and state is another."
Completely spot-on observation about real differences in cultures, one that will not play well with PC police. Bill Maher is certainly no friend of religious people; and gives grief equally to Christianity, Judaism, Scientology, and Mormons as you will see. But he specifically singles out Isalm with the recent actions in Afganistan and the Taliban's attack on an all girls school.
"When South Park got threatened last week by Islamists incensed at their depiction of Muhammad, it served -- or should serve -- as a reminder that our culture isn't just different than one that makes death threats to cartoonists. It's better." In his defense of the First Amendment and other Americal civil liberties, Maher -- who made the film "Religulous" -- continued: "The Western world needs to make it clear: Some things about our culture are not negotiable. And can't change. And one of them is freedom of speech, Separation of church and state is another."
Completely spot-on observation about real differences in cultures, one that will not play well with PC police. Bill Maher is certainly no friend of religious people; and gives grief equally to Christianity, Judaism, Scientology, and Mormons as you will see. But he specifically singles out Isalm with the recent actions in Afganistan and the Taliban's attack on an all girls school.
(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 14:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 14:38 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 14:39 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 16:13 (UTC)Just the way it is.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 16:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 14:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:41 (UTC)The difference between state church and theocracy is what, exactly? Oh, wait, I get it-it's only a theocracy when those desert savages with the long beards do it. That's why all Muslim states are theocracies and say, England and Norway aren't.....
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:Re: Maybe you'll hear me now:
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
Date: 4/5/10 18:27 (UTC)If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
Re: If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
From:Re: If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
From:Re: If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
From:Re: If you are free to do something does that mean you SHOULD do it?
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 18:29 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:02 (UTC)I would argue that the less guided by religious mythology a culture is, the better it is.
(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:33 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:45 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Small specious quibbles.
From:Re: Small specious quibbles.
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 17:53 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:37 (UTC)Would this be the Western world where in some cases freedom of speech means banning Holocaust denial? The Western world where freedom of religion translates to discrimination against Muslims? The Western world where freedom of speech meant censorship of things like Lady Chatterly's Lover?
(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:44 (UTC)This where the rest of the world had already had freedom for intellectuals to publish and in China at least the Jeffersonian ideal of how to refresh the tree of liberty since, oh.....the 11th Century BC......
(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 15:46 (UTC)I'd also like some substantiation of this discrimination again Muslims other than the profiling that's been a fact of life post 9/11.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 17:54 (UTC)(no subject)
From:Theo van Gogh says you're full of shit
From:Re: Theo van Gogh says you're full of shit
From:Would this be
From:Re: Would this be
From:Re: Would this be
From:Re: Theo van Gogh says you're full of shit
From:Re: Theo van Gogh says you're full of shit
From:Re: Theo van Gogh says you're full of shit
From:From Europe, the land of tolerance and freedom:
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 16:21 (UTC)Bill Maher on America
Date: 4/5/10 17:11 (UTC)Are we a great country or are we a stupid country? Is the only thing worth preserving in Mr. Maher's overly touted opinion; free speech?
He's like that old joke "Even a broken clock is right twice a day". He's overall opinion of the United States is one of contempt.
Re: Bill Maher on America
Date: 4/5/10 17:27 (UTC)Re: Bill Maher on America
From:Re: Bill Maher on America
From:Re: Bill Maher on America
From:Re: Bill Maher on America
From:Re: Bill Maher on America
From:I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
Date: 4/5/10 18:25 (UTC)There are plenty of people who simply don't understand why simply having respect for others is so difficult. It pains me to see a cultural icon trashed, without pause or consideration. I will not watch or in any way support South Park after they have done this. They are acting like rude little two-year-olds throwing a tantrum. And Maher is worse!
"Free speech Free speech Free speech Free speech!"
It's sickening to listen to people who have the money and power to command the media's lens complain about free speech-- they have more free speech and ANYONE --so many people never have the chance to have their ideas or views thrust into public view so prominently. Well, they have every right to exercise their freedom and earn my contempt, but it's pathetic to complain about "Free speech" when you work in media.
Yet the "other side" of the story remains reduced to a caricature-- as if anyone who could possibly be upset by this must be some kind of backward clueless humorless fundamentalist who wants to blow up the western world. (I'm not saying such people don't exist, they do...)
This isn't about "free speech" what he really wants is the right to talk over everyone else so his is the only voice we can hear.
Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
Date: 4/5/10 18:51 (UTC)Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:Re: I never know what is meant by free speech in this context?
From:(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 19:30 (UTC)i don't think the left can claim someone like bill maher for their side of he fight. i don`t think the right can either. his view points don`t fall along party lines - hence the bizarro voting history (bob dole, ralph nader, john mccain - until sara palin got into the mix).
and i totally love his "tactless, crude, unoriginal, infantile" ass, even though i don't agree with about half of the positions he takes.
(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 23:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/5/10 23:17 (UTC)(no subject)
From: