To serve man
25/4/10 17:20
Recently, President Obama outlined his vision for American space exploration, canceling the Constellation rocket program and apparently with it, America's journey back to the Moon. Not all, but a good portion of the American space exploration program involves the search for life on places other than Earth, and of course the big pay off will be finding intelligent life that has developed a technology that will allow for two-way communication, or space travel. Many efforts are underway to listen for any messages from such civilizations. While SETI isn't funded by the U.S. federal government,there are some scientists that are suggesting that if we do get a phone call from E.T., humanity should not answer and leave well enough alone. One of the most celebrated scientists and researchers of our era, Stephen Hawking agrees:
World renowned scientist Stephen Hawking believes extraterrestrial life almost certainly exists -- and humans should be extremely cautious about interacting with it. "To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational," Hawking says in a new Discovery Channel series called Stephen Hawking's Universe. "The real challenge is to work out what aliens might actually be like."
He suggests that aliens might simply raid Earth for its resources and then move on: "We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet. I imagine they might exist in massive ships, having used up all the resources from their home planet. Such advanced aliens would perhaps become nomads, looking to conquer and colonise whatever planets they can reach."
He concludes that trying to make contact with alien races is "a little too risky". He said: "If aliens ever visit us, I think the outcome would be much as when Christopher Columbus first landed in America, which didn't turn out very well for the Native Americans(source)
Politically, the question is: who would answer for Earth if we were to receive such a message? Who would make any decision that humanity should reply back? Do you think our governments should actively look to for alien life? I've always wondered why the underlying assumption that any technologically advanced species would treat us with kindness, given the history on Earth with one advanced civilization running the other less advanced one into the ground (e.g. Spain in the New World). Of course, the worse case situation would be technologically advanced aliens (with their vastly superior intellect) would have about the same morals as we do in our justification in raising cattle.
(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:24 (UTC)Humans are too boney. On the other hand, I suppose if they were intent on Serving Man they'd just Rapture a major city or two. Lots of food, panic among the food supply, more fun the next time.....
(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 13:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:31 (UTC)But beyond all that what motivation would they have for causing us trouble? What could human slaves do that robots couldn't? What resources do we have that are not much more easily gotten from asteroids or other planets? Its not like we would have any technologies they would need. I can't imagine we would be important enough to seek out and destroy.
If anything the fear is that they would simply not care enough to talk to us.
(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:49 (UTC)Biomass. Fear the Tyranid hive fleets, my friend.
(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:52 (UTC)Might as well invade Zimbabwe for their cattle.
(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:36 (UTC)Or: I agree with your statement, and did at the time I made mine as well.
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 19:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 04:12 (UTC)Either way the idea that an interstellar race would want our measly little rock is ridiculous, there are FAR easier ways in the solar system to get whatever resources they need.
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 19:16 (UTC)Because IMHO, any sufficiently long-lived alien species would become either equivalent to the contemporary Maya who live in the ruins of the ancient civilizations or alternately Dread Cthulhu and his starspawn. Honestly, I know what we'd do to the former but I'd rather we encounter them than an Eldritch Abomination of the sort that would be the more likely......
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 19:18 (UTC)Erm.....
Date: 26/4/10 19:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 04:09 (UTC)They pick up out signals and come visit us. They are not hostile, merely curious but are so advanced items they consider mere toys to leave behind when they are done with are more powerful than anything we possess.
Then they are done and leave behind some of their trash and we nuke each other into oblivion fighting over their scraps.
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 21:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 23:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 23:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/4/10 22:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 00:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 02:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 04:18 (UTC)He knows the numbers and that's why he believes that extraterrestrial life is inevitable and I agree with him. The problem is the most likely case is that there is no more than one other race which is both intelligent and not a million years more advanced than us in the entire Milky Way, if even that many.
In a million years we'll have the ability to cannibalize stars for whatever resources we need so anyone that old is unlikely to care about us any further than we care about plankton. Odds that they would even notice our signals are virtually non existent.
Races closer to us in technology level but still capable of interstellar travel are unlikely to be much of a threat because given the likely distance to them they'd probably be more interested in talking to us to see if we have heard of the same gods as them because we'd be the first intelligent race they had encountered as well.
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 18:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 04:29 (UTC)The whole question is ridiculous. Given: Earth's rotation on its axis, its orbital velocity around the Sun, the Sun's orbital velocity around the center of mass of the galaxy, and the similar situation for another planet orbiting a distant star, the likelyhood of any two sets of antennae being oriented properly for reception is virtually nonexistant. Even if such an alignment were to occur, it wouldn't last longer than a few seconds, certainly not more than ten seconds at best. This is what SETI has found so far: a few signals that just might be artificial, but none have lasted long enough to tell if that's the case. None would last long enough to extract any meaningful information anyway. The likelyhood of that other planet's being in the proper orientation to receive our reply some centuries or millenia later is asking the impossible.
As for our TV and radio signals making it to distant planets, none too likely. After all, these signals are radiated from antennae designed to maximize reception on the ground. This is the opposite of what you would design for reception from deep space. Furthermore, from space, you would be receiving every station that broadcast on any particular frequency all at once. It would be a mess, for certain. Given the inefficiency of the radiators, any such signal would probably drop below the noise floor after a few million miles anyway.
"ET" ain't gonna be calling any time soon.
(no subject)
Date: 26/4/10 19:18 (UTC)