[identity profile] bord-du-rasoir.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
What accounts for the spikes in these graphs? Conservative (free market) policy or corporatist (government intervention) policy?









Why'd average Wall St. bonus pay recently quadruple average annual salaries? Why'd the financial sector recently triple the nonfinancial sector? Why'd the highest incomes recently increase 36 times faster than median family income?

Provide concrete explanations as to how X (policy) caused Y (economic indicator). Point to specific legislation or executive orders.

The liberal position is predictable: The unprecedented extreme growth in the financial sector and increased inequality is bad. Free market policy (deregulation of banks --> derivatives market expansion --> collapse) is to blame.

I'm more interested in the conservative position: How do you explain the unprecedented growth in the financial sector and the increased income inequality? What're the causes? Is corporatism (government interventionism) responsible? If so, how? Do you draw a connection between the above figures and the financial collapse?

I honestly don't understand the conservative position.

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 13:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majortom-thecat.livejournal.com
Wow. I hope I never end up working for or living near a corporation that has such limited principles!

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 14:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
Thankfully, you have that choice!

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 14:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majortom-thecat.livejournal.com
Not really. Sometimes there aren't a lot of options.

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 14:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
The desirability of a choice does not negate the existence of the choice.

We're in a nation where our forefathers risked their lives just to move from one state to another yet people today act as if the world will end if there is a change in their lifestyle.

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 14:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majortom-thecat.livejournal.com
I don't mean to pry, but are you one of those people who dress up in period costumes at tea party rallies?

Sorry, that wasn't nice. I do agree that changes in lifestyle are sometimes inevitable and crucial but shouldn't include things like having to live with pollution and living in poverty when employers can easily afford to pay better.

(no subject)

Date: 20/4/10 17:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majortom-thecat.livejournal.com
That is a lovely thought, but I'm not convinced.

(no subject)

Date: 21/4/10 08:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
Don't you know, everyone can afford to live in a nice middle class neighbourhood.

(no subject)

Date: 21/4/10 12:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] majortom-thecat.livejournal.com
Yeah, I've seen those preachers on tv. You just have to really really believe that God wants you to have that house, and then send in your money so you can be blessed.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30