[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
The princess of Redneckistan recently attacked her president for his lack of "nucular" experience. In its typically biased fashion, the Associated Press reported her speaking American English rather than Rednecki. (BTW, I was fascinated to hear media critic Reese Erlich use the Rednecki word.)

With her own treasure trove of vast nucular experience, Princess Palin proclaimed the Rednecki military policy of nuking nations who use nasty weapons. What she actually said was along the lines that a good Rednecki would never assert restraint in the use of horribly toxic high energy burst weapons of mass destruction on an enemy who used weapons of lesser destructiveness.

For those who doubt the viciousness of the lovely princess, this incident should nail the lid on the coffin. How do you feel about the promise of another Rednecki in the Oval Office with her finger on the nuclear trigger? What is your opinion on the biased reporting of the AP?

(Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be a class issue, unless one class prefers diplomacy and another class prefers to nuke 'em 'til they glow.)

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] merig00.livejournal.com
and last time I checked after she said it we did change our policy to include biological and chemical weapons.

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Erm......wut?

Didn't Reagan start significant Arms Reduction talks with the USSR?

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mcpreacher.livejournal.com
i'll just leave this here

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-april-8-2010/the-big-bang-treaty

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] geezer-also.livejournal.com
You are a week late AND you left out Ceasar. Girl we need to talk, I'm worried about you ;)

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thies.livejournal.com
I don't think she does a lot of farming and I'm not sure getting a sunburn in Alaska is that easy either.

(no subject)

Date: 12/4/10 23:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
The princess of Redneckistan

Image
Edited Date: 12/4/10 23:54 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 13/4/10 00:04 (UTC)
ext_3190: Red icon with logo "I drink Nozz-a-la- Cola" in cursive. (group w)
From: [identity profile] primroseburrows.livejournal.com
As much as I loathe the idea of the two names being associated with each other in any instance, I feel compelled to point out that Jimmy Carter, one of my favourite people ever, also said "nucular". That being the case, I can forgive Ms. Palin that much. But yeah, only about that much.

(no subject)

Date: 13/4/10 00:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
'Talking Rednecki: Nucular Experience'

Can you give me a lesson in how to talk Colored or Negroid later?

(no subject)

Date: 13/4/10 01:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com
"I really have no response. Because last I checked, Sarah Palin's not much of an expert on nuclear issues."

--Barack Obama

'nuff said.

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/exclusive-president-obama-slaps-sarah-palin-expert-nukes/story?id=10321775

Agree about Palin Rednecki mistake...

Date: 13/4/10 12:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreadfulpenny81.livejournal.com
...but how about this?



Oh, how quickly people forget...

(no subject)

Date: 13/4/10 20:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] debergerac.livejournal.com
redneck refers to poor, white southerners.

(no subject)

Date: 15/4/10 17:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
From the NPR:
the role of U.S. nuclear weapons in deterring non-nuclear attacks – conventional, biological, or chemical – has declined significantly. The United States will continue to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in deterring non-nuclear attacks.
To that end, the United States is now prepared to strengthen its long-standing “negative security assurance” by declaring that the United States will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear weapons states that are party to the NPT and in compliance with their nuclear non-proliferation obligations.
The United States is therefore not prepared at the present time to adopt a universal policy that deterring nuclear attack is the sole purpose of nuclear weapons, but will work to establish conditions under which such a policy could be safely adopted.


The last bit is what is being objected to. Nuclear retaliation is useful for deterring any kind of attack and should be used as such, not restricted to only deterring nuclear attack.

Your spin on her comments are typical left-wing anti-nuke BS.

(no subject)

Date: 15/4/10 17:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucular

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031