luzribeiro: (Default)
[personal profile] luzribeiro posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
"Former President Donald Trump on Thursday slammed the U.S. decision to send top-of-the-line tanks to Ukraine, calling the effort to repel the Russian invasion a “crazy war.”

In the latest criticism of aid to Ukraine, Trump echoed the Russian talking point that sending the Abrams M1 tanks amount to an escalation that could lead to nuclear war."


LINK

Not that Trump and Logic could ever coexist in the same sentence, but really. I don't get his logic here, if any? Let's end this crazy war by... I don't know, stopping sending military aid for Ukraine? How does that work? Did he mean we should just let Ukraine roll over and be enslaved by Russia? Is that what he undestands by achieving peace fast? How is he sure appeasing Putin by giving him Ukraine will make him stop from invading other countries?

Just. Does. Not. Compute.

Let's keep in mind Putin is the single individual on the planet whom Trump has never criticized or insulted. Even more, Trump will not allow an accusation or insult to Putin go unanswered. He always defends or deflects when it comes to Putin. It is obvious Putin has something on Trump. The only question is what is it? Actually here's a poll. What do you think is the reason for Trump's stance on this?

a) Putin has something on Trump
b) Trump loves dictators and wishes he could have been one
c) Trump has been experiencing senescence for some time now
d) all of the above

(no subject)

Date: 30/1/23 15:24 (UTC)
dewline: "Truth is still real" (anti-fascism)
From: [personal profile] dewline
My choice is "d) all of the above".

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/23 00:54 (UTC)
oportet: (Default)
From: [personal profile] oportet
Seems like Putin would have had a much easier time invading Ukraine if he did it while he had a puppet in the White House...

Instead he waited until he didn't have control over the leader of the country contributing three quarters of the current aid to Ukraine.

Seems like a silly move by Putin.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/23 05:28 (UTC)
asthfghl: (Слушам и не вярвам на очите си!)
From: [personal profile] asthfghl
I think it's C.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/23 16:04 (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mikeyxw
How about e) Oligarchs stick together?

At this point, I don't think there is anything Putin could have on Trump. I'd be shocked and disappointed if there aren't pictures of some Russian hooker peeing on the ex-pres, not if there are. I just think Trump saw himself as similar to Putin, some hyper-masculine leader with an extra helping of decisiveness. I'd also say his foreign policy was much more isolationist than pro-Putin. Yeah, he'd probably not have helped out Ukraine as much, but more because he wouldn't care rather than out of some pro-Putin sentiment.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/23 19:33 (UTC)
mahnmut: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mahnmut
Like anyone would give a damn if there were even twenty hookers peeing on some old dude somewhere.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/23 19:32 (UTC)
airiefairie: (Default)
From: [personal profile] airiefairie
I'm not sure why Trump is still considered relevant.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

The Rule of Power

DAILY QUOTE:
"Clearly, the penguins have finally gone too far. First they take our hearts, now they’re tanking the global economy one smug waddle at a time. Expect fish sanctions by Friday."

April 2025

M T W T F S S
  1 23 4 56
78910 111213
14 15 1617 18 1920
21222324252627
282930