![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This tree beautifully captures the connections between groups of languages in Eurasia, and it shows that all those languages descend from a common ancestral proto-language. The size of the leaves on top of each branch approximates how many people speak each language. (click on image for large version)


(no subject)
Date: 12/6/20 21:46 (UTC)Nit 1: Indo-European vs. Uralic. That diagram does kind of make them look like one big tree, but the linguists' consensus, I believe, is that they are two entirely separate language families. In other words, yes, the (many) Indo-European languages are believed to have one common proto-language, but the (fewer) Uralic languages have a different common proto-language.
Nit 2: I don't know if you meant to say this, but the wording of the post *appears* to imply that the two families shown, between them, comprise all of the languages of "Eurasia". Counterexample from Europe: Basque. Counterexample from Asia: Chinese.
Source for most of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_families
End of nits.
(no subject)
Date: 13/6/20 06:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 13/6/20 07:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/6/20 11:06 (UTC)