[identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
So, it seems Pakistan's potent opposition parties are unhappy with the conditions on American aid. Now they're talking about negotiating with the US over it. While I don't think it's likely, a defeat in Pakistan's parliament could spell overall defeat both for Obama's war efforts in Afghanistan, and peoples' willingness to put up with Afghanistan any longer. Is there a way to keep Pakistan happy and sovereign without adversely impacting our actual goals? I think we can all agree that money we spend there has to have a specific purpose if we're going to spend it all. Can we trust the government to fight the Taliban? Can we expect that, without US conditions on aid, they'll do so in a way that compliments our own efforts across the border?

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/09 14:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
It's already collapsed once and may end up doing so again....

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/09 15:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
To a degree, yes, but if it gets too expensive and we have to withdraw, all we've done is make it far, far worse....

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30