[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Well, here's more evidence that Trump not only believes he doesn't need to work with any other branches of government, but is explicitly trying to avoid involving anyone else (GOP or otherwise) in formulating his policies. Politico has a new article out, "Hill staffers secretly worked on Trump's immigration order":

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-immigration-congress-order-234392

"Senior staffers on the House Judiciary Committee helped Donald Trump's top aides draft the executive order curbing immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations, but the Republican committee chairman and party leadership were not informed, according to multiple sources involved in the process.
...
"The work of the committee aides began during the transition period after the election and before Donald Trump was sworn in. The staffers signed nondisclosure agreements, according to two sources familiar with the matter."

In a nutshell, Trump had House Judiciary Committee aides work on his document, but demanded that they not inform their own bosses of what they were doing. Which is, frankly, a pretty worrisome precedent. Question. Will Trump ever learn that this is not proper behavior? Or will he double-down as usual, and continue to bypass Congressional leadership in future actions? And would that be grounds for his own party throwing him under the bus at some point (like, when the public outcry to his policies starts to get too unbearable and backfires at them), and seek for ways to impeach him and substitute him with the more controllable Pence?

Really, this is weird - at least from a first sight. The logical question is, why wouldn't Trump want to work with a Congress controlled in both houses by Republicans? Why would he instead keep issuing a record number of poorly thought out executive orders, some of which clearly exceed his authority? And why have so few conservative PRSI members disagreed with these excesses? I know, I know, partisan interest trumps (ha!) national interest, but still. Can't these guys see that this is only going to hurt them in the long-term? I mean, the pendulum could swing the other way pretty badly, and pretty quick.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/17 19:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
Slightly disingenuous. No very disingenuous.

The Patriot Act was passed under Obama?
Obama used more executive orders than GWB?

I thought you better than that.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/17 20:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
If the last few days are in indication, facts are going to be woefully rare these next four years.

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/17 22:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dexeron.livejournal.com
Hey, what better to go with Alternativefacts™ than some Alternativehistory™?

(no subject)

Date: 31/1/17 22:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
My alternative histories are all fictional, and are understood to be such. I can compartmentalise and separate real life and fiction. Not being able to do so is one of the many hallmarks of schizophrenia.

America is showing some schizophrenic tendencies right now, even amongst the rational and decent minded. This doesn't bode well.

god yes

Date: 1/2/17 00:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pigshitpoet.livejournal.com
this looks like a fascist coup to me. i hope we are wrong. like israel gone nazi. trump is a boy from brazil. good luck with all that

http://gonzo21.livejournal.com/1628442.html

(no subject)

Date: 1/2/17 01:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oportet.livejournal.com
I think he feels like they (the Republican Congress) owes him more than he owes them. And as far as that goes - I think he's right - but as far as leverage goes - what CAN you do for me far outweighs what DID you do for me.

(no subject)

Date: 1/2/17 07:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
There was a short debate here in the morning about these latest Trump moves, and I was shocked to find out that a guy who's a prominent social-democrat (or socialist, if you like), was actually rooting for The Donald. When called out on Trump's skirting of the rules and the constitution, you know what argument this guy was able to come up with? All he was able to say was, "I believe in the integrity of the American political system, I'm sure Trump won't go to any excesses and this won't reach any extremes".

Well, hello? It already HAS.

(no subject)

Date: 1/2/17 07:23 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 1/2/17 13:24 (UTC)

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30