[identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
...When Trump is confronted with a possible conspiracy that presumably worked in his favour, he instantaneously counters with a conspiracy theory of his own. It's like a knee-jerk reflex at this point.

Trump Claims, With No Evidence, That ‘Millions of People’ Voted Illegally

And since we're in the era of post-truth (whatever that's supposed to mean anyway), a lie told a hundred maybe two times, becomes truth. Right?

Well, here's the thing though. The electoral college, as weird and outdated as it may be, and as distorting the democratic process as it is, is what it is. And unless you'd like to fundamentally scrap it and replace it with something else, it is there to stay. It'll certainly create more future situations where one candidate loses the popular vote (by nearly a million) but ends up a "landslide" winner. Challenging that makes the loser look like, well, a sore loser.

Frankly, I don't get the whole effort. It shows that the losing candidate is either desperate, or (and) doesn't grasp the whole picture of why she actually lost. It's not about a few tens of thousands of votes. It goes much deeper than that. We've talked about this already here. Unless the political elites do some thorough soul-searching and come out with a thoughtful analysis of the causes for this outcome, and then a plan, they'll keep snatching defeats from the jaws of presumed victory in the future as well.

As for the recount, it may or may not produce something viable (most likely not, but apparently it's worth a shot, from Hillary's perspective - even though the recount has been conveniently triggered by a third party). The thing is, the Obama-Trump transition process has already begun. Face it already, folks. There's no way back from this. Trump is the president. Everyone has to deal with it.

Granted, there's a difference between contending an election after the fact based on how close it was, and declaring it fraudulent outright without any evidence. While Hillary's actions (or those of her surrogates, more precisely) may not be exactly of the highest moral integrity imaginable (and don't quite match her preliminary calls for her opponent to respect the election result no matter what), they're hardly comparable to the new lows that Trump's actions are plunging to. Come on dude, you're the president. You've got what you wanted. Time to grow up already. Are you going to rule a country like that?

(no subject)

Date: 28/11/16 08:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
I'd call it the Twitter style of governance. Executive decrees shall henceforth be dropped upon the populace through 140-character tweets.

"Today banning abortion on federal level. Some hippies blocked entrance to my golfcourse in response. SAD"

(no subject)

Date: 28/11/16 09:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
*snortle*

(no subject)

Date: 28/11/16 09:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Yeah, but you'd need to pronounce this in Trump-voice for full effect.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031     

Summary