"Right now, doctors a lot of times are forced to make decisions based on the fee payment schedule that’s out there. So if they’re looking and you come in and you’ve got a bad sore throat or your child has a bad sore throat or has repeated sore throats, the doctor may look at the reimbursement system and say to himself, “You know what? I make a lot more money if I take this kid’s tonsils out.”
-President Obama
All I’m saying is let’s take the example of something like diabetes, one of—a disease that’s skyrocketing, partly because of obesity, partly because it’s not treated as effectively as it could be. Right now if we paid a family—if a family care physician works with his or her patient to help them lose weight, modify diet, monitors whether they’re taking their medications in a timely fashion, they might get reimbursed a pittance. But if that same diabetic ends up getting their foot amputated, that’s $30,000, $40,000, $50,000—immediately the surgeon is reimbursed. Well, why not make sure that we’re also reimbursing the care that prevents the amputation, right? That will save us money.
- President Obama
But what we can do is make sure that at least some of the waste that exists in the system that's not making anybody's mom better, that is loading up on additional tests or additional drugs that the evidence shows is not necessarily going to improve care, that at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller.
-President Obama
First of kudos to the President for using the word pittance! That's like using whilst. You just don't get to do that every day!
Second, thank god someone is bringing to light the fact that doctors are evil, and money hungry, hatchet men! This is why I refuse to go to the doctor until Obamacare is in effect!
Last point, as a young man who has a 94 year old great grandma and a 70-something great aunt I am all for Obama's 'take a pill you annoying old lady' policy!” They'd be a lot less crazy if they were properly doped up!
Side note: my Word spell check does not recognize 'Obama' or 'Obamacare' is my Microsoft inherently racist?
If socialism is the new 'N' word I think Microsoft Word (and all Microsoft 2007 programs) should be consider some racial pejorative.
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 15:50 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 15:54 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 16:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 18:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 18:39 (UTC)In any case, I'll back him up on his claim: http://www.naturalnews.com/012291.html (http://www.naturalnews.com/012291.html) It's admittedly a somewhat biased page, but it takes a lot of quotes from other sources, some considerably more reputable than the site itself.
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 15:50 (UTC)Result is: overworked, overstressed people who NEED to try to suck every possible penny out of the customer.
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 15:55 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 15:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 17:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 16:15 (UTC)I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're interested in a productive discussion despite the snarkgasm. Other than the "blanket statement" you mention in a previous comment, what else do you find problematic with those quotes in full context? If you disagree that abuse in the system is a problem, why not include some statistics to support your thesis?
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 18:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 19:16 (UTC)Now you, unless your only purpose is hyperbole and dilution.
(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 17:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 17:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 18:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 17:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14/8/09 20:02 (UTC)maybe you're doing it wrong
(no subject)
Date: 15/8/09 02:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/8/09 03:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/8/09 23:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/8/09 23:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/8/09 23:51 (UTC)