This is when you know reform is needed:

[underlankers.livejournal.com]

The Economist praises the Swedish health care system over the American on issues of incentives.

Article linked here:

http://www.economist.com/world/unitedstates/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13899647

Also....an image worth keeping in mind for defenders of the broken system:



Now, there's something wrong with this picture. See if you can tell me what it is.....

X-posted from my own LJ.

Comments

[dwer.livejournal.com]

and you continue to miss the point. The people who have insurance are mostly ok -- they at least have SOME level of care. It's all the expenses for uninsured people who have to resort to the ER who get charged tens of thousands of dollars for their care.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

So, again, why blow up the whole thing and make the care worse to solve that alleged problem?

[dwer.livejournal.com]

if only Obama really was "blowing up the whole thing" and junking the dysfunctional system we have. Single Payer really is the way to go, and it's because of wingnuts like you that it's not happening.

Nevertheless, improvement is needed. Obama isn't "blowing the whole thing up", he's suggesting that the government should be making improvements.

I realize that for someone who thinks that government can never work, it's a difficult concept, but hey, it's never nice to point at the retarded kids.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

ingle Payer really is the way to go, and it's because of wingnuts like you that it's not happening.

Opposition to single payer is broad. To blame it on the "wingnuts" (who are, by the way, correct) is to deny the reality.

I realize that for someone who thinks that government can never work, it's a difficult concept, but hey, it's never nice to point at the retarded kids.

The times government does work is rare. Health is too important to entrust to the government.

[dwer.livejournal.com]

well, this is what you get for looking into that mirror.

Health care is too important, so it cannot be entrusted to the government, but NATIONAL DEFENSE is entrusted to the government?

No. Health care is too important to be left to profiteering robber barons.

[badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com]

Health care is too important, so it cannot be entrusted to the government, but NATIONAL DEFENSE is entrusted to the government?

Correct, mostly because of the diplomatic power and international role the government plays. If it was possible to create a situation where privatized homeland defense could exist with all the other other countries involved, I'd be all for it.

No. Health care is too important to be left to profiteering robber barons.

It's a good thing we leave it to private insurers instead, then.

[typewriterking.livejournal.com]

... it's never nice to point at the retarded kids.

How progressive of you.