![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
nairiporter.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
talkpoliticsWhen does irrational fear of science become detrimental to society at large? Examples abound. So here is one.
Vaccine preventable outbreaks are real
A few things to note:
- All of that red, which seems to dominate? It's measles. It's even peeking through in the United States, and it's smothering the United Kingdom.
- If you get rid of the measles, you can start to see mumps. Again, crushing the UK and popping up in the US.
- Both measles and mumps are part of the MMR vaccine.
- Almost all the whooping cough is in the United States.
It is really astounding to see how in the 21st century, people frequently take the bait of opinion passing for 'fact', and belief over solid science. The problem is, lots of folks find science boring and tedious at school, and then proceed to fear it and view it with suspicion as adults - which then reflects on society at large, and, as demonstrated above, can have real consequences to entire generations.
So why is science so boring to so many people? Is it perhaps because the education system is framed in such a way that it demands of students to memorise stuff without necessarily understanding it, just for the short-term goal of getting good grades at school and nothing beyond that? Is it because the education process in its present form tends to scare and disgust people away from science at an early age, rather than fascinating them and making them hungrier for actual scientific knowledge? Is it people's inherent laziness to think outside the box of their daily routine and transcend the conventions of their social environment, which is a general requirement for abandoning every-day "common sense" and understanding scientific knowledge? Is it that people are supicious of "cold", rational knowledge, and tend to favour emotion and sentiment over reason as more valuable?
Science makes statements based on currently available information. It never asserts something to be the absolute truth, because that would require infinite knowledge - and that's the aspect of science which is probably the most misunderstood, most misused, abused, and cited most often as a flaw of science, rather than being acknowledged as science's most valuable asset. Because people prefer to be presented with definite, absolute answers to complex questions about complex phenomena. And this apparent ambiguity in science could be undesirably confusing for them.
These things may sound too abstract and philosophical, but when we move to real-life examples like the above, things could get really serious. One would expect that in the 21st century, the developed industrialised societies would have embraced rationalism, reason and the scientific approach a long time ago. And for the most part they truly have. But there is also this segment of society that's not insignificant at all, which remains stuck in some semi-ignorant state of Medievalism that has existed since time immemorial.
Measles and whooping cough could have been and should have been eradicated from the face of Earth a long time ago. This is certainly a man-made tragedy that could have been rendered extinct by now. And I'm not only talking about the developed world. The wealthy nations have had all the means and capacity to see to it that the Third World gets completely vaccinated, with all the relevant information provided to the families involved. Because nothing can be more powerful a motivation than understanding a problem and grasping the urgent necessity to tackle it in an adequate way.
Granted, there are caveats to an issue as complex as vaccination. There are circumstances when certain health conditions prevent particular kids from being vaccinated. Many vaccines that are currently developed do not provide a complete resistance to a virus. A virus exposed to an incomplete resistance could actually end up being resistant not only to the vaccination but to the treatment itself, too, and thus become truly deadly. These are issues that ought to be investigated, tackled, and explained. The alternative is succumbing to near-archaic levels of ignorance and superstition, and risking countless lives and social and economic loss in the process, in case an epidemic outbreak potentially reaches critical proportions.
The irrational factor remains the main detriment to addressing these issues in an efficient way. People's proneness to falling for hyperbolic hysteria and manipulative tricks such as turning anecdata into presumed data, is part of this. To put it simply: in most cases, especially with the mainstream vaccinations, complications are far more likely to arise from illness than from vaccination - but that fact is often overlooked by those who have already got their preconceived notions deeply embedded in their mindset. Example:
A research on the adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine Ceravix, reported between April 2008 and September 2009 demonstrates the enormous discrepancy between the number of vaccinations and the occurrence of adverse reactions from them - a ratio which of course is often represented in a severely distorted manner to the public.
It is true that a lot of thought should be invested into the way we approach vaccinations. Medicine abounds of examples of horrific mistakes when we thought something was being done right, until it was found out it had all been wrong. It is also true that selling new vaccination (possibly enhanced through the compulsory element) is a major profitable business worldwide, in many cases facilitated by government legislation. Which is what makes issues such as mandatory vaccinations not just a medical, but more an economic, and thus, political issue as well.
Vaccine preventable outbreaks are real
A few things to note:
- All of that red, which seems to dominate? It's measles. It's even peeking through in the United States, and it's smothering the United Kingdom.
- If you get rid of the measles, you can start to see mumps. Again, crushing the UK and popping up in the US.
- Both measles and mumps are part of the MMR vaccine.
- Almost all the whooping cough is in the United States.
It is really astounding to see how in the 21st century, people frequently take the bait of opinion passing for 'fact', and belief over solid science. The problem is, lots of folks find science boring and tedious at school, and then proceed to fear it and view it with suspicion as adults - which then reflects on society at large, and, as demonstrated above, can have real consequences to entire generations.
So why is science so boring to so many people? Is it perhaps because the education system is framed in such a way that it demands of students to memorise stuff without necessarily understanding it, just for the short-term goal of getting good grades at school and nothing beyond that? Is it because the education process in its present form tends to scare and disgust people away from science at an early age, rather than fascinating them and making them hungrier for actual scientific knowledge? Is it people's inherent laziness to think outside the box of their daily routine and transcend the conventions of their social environment, which is a general requirement for abandoning every-day "common sense" and understanding scientific knowledge? Is it that people are supicious of "cold", rational knowledge, and tend to favour emotion and sentiment over reason as more valuable?
Science makes statements based on currently available information. It never asserts something to be the absolute truth, because that would require infinite knowledge - and that's the aspect of science which is probably the most misunderstood, most misused, abused, and cited most often as a flaw of science, rather than being acknowledged as science's most valuable asset. Because people prefer to be presented with definite, absolute answers to complex questions about complex phenomena. And this apparent ambiguity in science could be undesirably confusing for them.
These things may sound too abstract and philosophical, but when we move to real-life examples like the above, things could get really serious. One would expect that in the 21st century, the developed industrialised societies would have embraced rationalism, reason and the scientific approach a long time ago. And for the most part they truly have. But there is also this segment of society that's not insignificant at all, which remains stuck in some semi-ignorant state of Medievalism that has existed since time immemorial.
Measles and whooping cough could have been and should have been eradicated from the face of Earth a long time ago. This is certainly a man-made tragedy that could have been rendered extinct by now. And I'm not only talking about the developed world. The wealthy nations have had all the means and capacity to see to it that the Third World gets completely vaccinated, with all the relevant information provided to the families involved. Because nothing can be more powerful a motivation than understanding a problem and grasping the urgent necessity to tackle it in an adequate way.
Granted, there are caveats to an issue as complex as vaccination. There are circumstances when certain health conditions prevent particular kids from being vaccinated. Many vaccines that are currently developed do not provide a complete resistance to a virus. A virus exposed to an incomplete resistance could actually end up being resistant not only to the vaccination but to the treatment itself, too, and thus become truly deadly. These are issues that ought to be investigated, tackled, and explained. The alternative is succumbing to near-archaic levels of ignorance and superstition, and risking countless lives and social and economic loss in the process, in case an epidemic outbreak potentially reaches critical proportions.
The irrational factor remains the main detriment to addressing these issues in an efficient way. People's proneness to falling for hyperbolic hysteria and manipulative tricks such as turning anecdata into presumed data, is part of this. To put it simply: in most cases, especially with the mainstream vaccinations, complications are far more likely to arise from illness than from vaccination - but that fact is often overlooked by those who have already got their preconceived notions deeply embedded in their mindset. Example:
A research on the adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine Ceravix, reported between April 2008 and September 2009 demonstrates the enormous discrepancy between the number of vaccinations and the occurrence of adverse reactions from them - a ratio which of course is often represented in a severely distorted manner to the public.
It is true that a lot of thought should be invested into the way we approach vaccinations. Medicine abounds of examples of horrific mistakes when we thought something was being done right, until it was found out it had all been wrong. It is also true that selling new vaccination (possibly enhanced through the compulsory element) is a major profitable business worldwide, in many cases facilitated by government legislation. Which is what makes issues such as mandatory vaccinations not just a medical, but more an economic, and thus, political issue as well.
(no subject)
Date: 4/2/14 18:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/2/14 18:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/2/14 22:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/2/14 04:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4/2/14 20:20 (UTC)But of course plenty of deluded folk would beg to differ! They'd find all sorts of superstitious justifications like "vaccines cause autism" and other such nonsense, all the while, the resources for eradicating a number of preventable diseases in the whole world being right there the whole time. But no, we're just too preoccupied with finding new ways to blow up stuff and kill people.
Hope dies last that some time in the unforeseeable future, homo sapiens would evolve into something at least partially resembling a truly thinking species, but I ain't seeing that coming anytime soon. Sorry, Darwin.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 03:03 (UTC)We don't see old people whose backs were bent from tuberculosis, or limp limbs from polio (and most people don't know the braces on Forrest Gump's legs were because of polio), and we don't lose 1 in 5 childhood friends to measles anymore. I think that because we don't see that, we (as a population...i guess?) don't feel the urgent need to vaccinate any more. Parents go "Oh I had chicken pox, measles/mumps can't be that much worse."
There are so many other things to die from. I don't understand. And even if it did cause autism, is autism really to be that feared? What does that really say...I'd rather my kid die than have autism? eh.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 05:41 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 04:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 07:57 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 21:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 19:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 02:27 (UTC)Most of the anti-vaccers I've encountered or heard about have been of yuppie or ultra-green variety. sure you've got the occasional "Christian Scientist" but they seem to be a marked minority.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 08:03 (UTC)This is a girl with whooping cough. The US is currently having a growing outbreak of the disease on its hands, and of other preventable diseases because idiot parents listen to whackjobs like Jenny McCarthy, a lady who thinks she cured her son of autism.
Please get your kids vaccinated. Vaccines are not made of mercury, they don't give your kids autism, and they've saved countless lives.
Don't be an ignorant asshole who helps create the next epidemic.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 15:02 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 15:41 (UTC)Or Creationists.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 15:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 15:44 (UTC)It must be a dark and scary world that you inhabit.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 15:48 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 17:36 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 18:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 18:28 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 19:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:37 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 20:04 (UTC)Science isn't a "they". Its a method, an approach to understanding our universe. And its a method that yields useful results. Not sure how you want to define superior, but "useful results" seems a good start.
(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 22:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 16:24 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 17:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5/2/14 21:21 (UTC)(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-mcelwee/bill-nye-ken-ham-debate_b_4723766.html)
(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 19:05 (UTC)The notion that Roman bishops and the pontifex maximus could be considered "experts" on theology is laughable. That would be like considering George Bush the elder to be an expert on broccoli.
(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 19:08 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 19:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6/2/14 19:43 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/2/14 19:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 7/2/14 19:19 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/2/14 16:16 (UTC)