[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
When a person has been drawn into the depths of hellish governance his every action leads to additional degradation. It is similar to the way that struggling in quicksand only leads to a faster submersion. We can see this process at work in that magnificent bastion of outer darkness that goes by the name of the Vatican.

The latest news from that cavernous domain is that Roman practice is intolerant. Before this bit of "so what" insight, priestly celibacy was put on the table for discussion. It may seem that the newest Pontifex Maximus is open to reform in order to correct the wayward sexual tendencies that have plagued the Roman priesthood through the period of full-blown flat-Earth worship to the present day. As with American military intelligence, things within the Vatican are not what they seem to the outside world.

The official argument in favor of the celibacy requirement is that Roman priests need to dedicate their lives to the despotic kingdom of the material Creator. Raising a family will distract them from the task at hand. According to legend, Jesus and his followers had to forgo family life in their campaign against despotism. It makes sense that despotic priests must do the same in order to counter the opposition.

Now the tables have turned and it may be more to the advantage of Roman despotism to emulate the Protestant practice of allowing priests to wed. This is especially an issue now that Rome is trying to attract reactionary Anglican clerics to rejoin the Roman hierarchy. Anglican reforms have gone through a progression of abandoning the celibacy requirement, abandoning the gender requirement, and abandoning the homophobia requirement. Retrograde Anglican clerics accepted the first reforms but have been alienated by the relaxation of homophobia. It went too far too fast. By changing its policy on celibacy, Rome may be hoping to staunch the flux of rebellion and pick up some of Caesar's wayward sheep.

Even before the recent attempt to attract Anglican reactionaries there was a push to allow celibacy in order to promote Roman despotism in Africa. Advocates of clerical marriage observed that many Africans treat men better when they have a wife or more. This recent move to discuss relaxation of the celibacy rule may also be aimed at expansion in Africa.

Will this dialog on a change in the rules at the Vatican help the cause of Rome or will it lead to additional departures from Caesar's flock?

Links: Elliot Hannon on the Vatican's willingness to discuss priestly celibacy. Tracy Connor on some of the issues involved with priestly marriage. Tom Kington on plans to re-write the Vatican constitution.

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 15:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dexeron.livejournal.com
The official argument in favor of the celibacy requirement is that Roman priests need to dedicate their lives to the despotic kingdom of the material Creator.

I don't think any "official" arguments from the Vatican would use the term "despotic" to describe their god, or his kingdom.

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 16:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
The "material creator" bit sort of outs you as a Gnostic Christian, even if you're not one.
That, coupled with the anti-psychiatry theme could lead to endless speculation. Cathar, Hubbardist: what's in a name?

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 16:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
What does this post have to do with politics, frankly?

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 17:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
Not really. It's an Old Men's club that will probably be the last institution on Earth to acknowledge that women are human. Like royalty, it hangs around because of money and having been around a long time but eventually will fade away as it should.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 17:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Not in a political community, the way you've posted about it, no.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 18:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 18:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com
The relevance is in regards to social politics in the international context. If you think a post isn't falling within lines, you can let us know in the reporting thread without causing unnecessary drama here. Thanks.

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 20:17 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
That's cool, but I don't see a reason to freeze the thing.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 30/9/13 20:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 01:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 06:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 15:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 01:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 07:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 15:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 15:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 15:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 15:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 18:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
Why do you never mention the Eastern Orthodox Church? After all, when it comes to doctrines of the the Creator of the Flat and Immovable Earth, there is no real distance between Orthodoxy and Catholicism. They spring from the same "rotten" root of Constantinian/Imperial/Nicene dogmatism, do they not? At the heart of both is the rejection of Arianism and Docetism and firm affirmation of both homoousios and Trinitarianism. The doctrinal separation between them came much, much later and didn't really touch on these points directly. Nevertheless, in the Orthodox tradition clerical celibacy was never the same kind of issue as it became with the Roman rite in the 11th and 12th centuries.

(no subject)

Date: 1/10/13 01:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
There was a good deal of animosity early on between the Eastern and Western areas of Christianity as well, some of it was on pretty substantial (bad pun!) subjects. Although to an onlooker, those differences had to have been mind-numbingly trivial.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 16:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 16:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 16:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 17:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 21:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rimpala.livejournal.com
I was going to write something but

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 23:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
I'm curious how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you lace everything you say with hyperbole.

(no subject)

Date: 1/10/13 00:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
It was the "dutch lace (http://atouchofdutch.com/index.php?cPath=24)" of hyperbole. But yeah, less effect, more chord!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com - Date: 1/10/13 17:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 30/9/13 23:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com
Condemning celibacy as a wayward sexual tendency reveals a grave disregard for the rights, dignity and sexual freedom of individuals.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com - Date: 2/10/13 03:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com - Date: 3/10/13 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com - Date: 4/10/13 01:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 1/10/13 00:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Petty priests pretend penis placement preferences perpetually perplex powerful pontiffs prudish proclamations.

(no subject)

Date: 1/10/13 14:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] comeonyouspurs.livejournal.com
The Pope's Penis

It hangs deep in his robes, a delicate
clapper at the center of a bell.

It moves when he moves, a ghostly fish in a
halo of silver seaweed, the hair
swaying in the dark and the heat – and at night

while his eyes sleep, it stands up
in praise of God.

Sharon Olds

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

May 2025

M T W T F S S
   12 3 4
56 78 91011
12 13 1415 161718
19202122 232425
26 2728293031