Another story of Syria

[dexeron.livejournal.com]

Jon Stewart returned last night, and the talk of the day was, of course, Syria (and he, of course, tried to inject a little humor into the situation.) However, the interview segment with which he closed out the show was anything but humorous, bringing in Andrew Harper, the head of the United Nations Refugee Agency in Jordan. This is the important story, in my opinion: the story of millions of people displaced from their homes, many of them women and children. It's also the story of nations such as Jordan who are doing what they can to provide a safe haven for some of these people, and the incredible work being done by the UN, an organization that is so often derided by folks here in the U.S., but which does certain things very well; this is one of them.

Any discussion of our response to the situation in Syria should involve the discussion of how we can help these people. While we're talking about what message we should send to the Assad regime, or whether or not we should act militarily, and in which way, here is an obvious human crisis where we could all put our money where our mouths are. I'd prefer to see this story given the lion's share of airtime on our cable news stations, over constant redundant talking heads debating back and forth on questions of chemical weapons and factions and military responses and political calculus.

Here's the interview, in two parts:

If the embedding doesn't work for some reason, here are direct links:

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-september-3-2013/exclusive---andrew-harper-extended-interview-pt--1

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-september-3-2013/exclusive---andrew-harper-extended-interview-pt--2

Comments

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Keeping your children in a war zone is a not reasonable option.

[gunslnger.livejournal.com]

That's an overly simplistic and unrealistic view of the situation.

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Refugees wanting to protect their families and remove them from a war zone is "over simplistic and unrealistic", but casually asserting they are "running away" is realistic nuanced complex position? Yep, they're not fleeing a war zone due to violence, rather there are 2 million free loading cowards in Syria.

[kylinrouge.livejournal.com]

Get a leg blown off? Just rub some dirt in it.

[gunslnger.livejournal.com]

Since that's not an accurate assessment of what either of us has said...

[yes-justice.livejournal.com]

Its a quote. If you have something to say, say it.

[gunslnger.livejournal.com]

You do know that a quote means using the same words in the same order as the original, right? Not just a couple words taken out of context, rearranged, other words put around them which change the meaning.

Here's how you use a quote:

Your response of "Keeping our children in a war zone is a not reasonable option. " is not a useful response to what I said, as it's not the opposite of what they are doing, nor is it the only alternative option, so there's no particular reason to assume that it's what I was intending them to do as an alternative to what they are doing. You were merely being inflammatory and thus I saw no reason to continue down that illogical path with you.