This post is my senate voting strategy and I thought some of you furriners would appreciate what goes in to voting in an Australian election (most of you have heard stories). This is for the upper house, where in my state there are over 100 candidates.

Ballot for the Senate
For the "I don't care" or "I don't know" voters, you only have to number one box. If that person doesn't get a seat, then they get to choose where your vote goes next. I don't like this, so I number all the boxes (you must number either 1 or at least 90% for the ballot to be valid).
Follows is an FB PSA I just wrote up:
There's lots of funny shenanigans going on with preferences this election (including, I'm sure, some parties that have been created specifically to funnel preferences), this means that voting below the line is more important than ever, unfortunately, there's a bazillion candidates, so who is gonna read all that (again, I'm pretty sure it's an anti-democratic plot by the majors).
Your 1 vote gives the person/party $2.31, provided they get 4% of the vote, so prioritise the person/party who you want to keep going; even without getting elected there's things that can be done with that money (like advocacy).
I've just read through ALL the policies and have given each a one line summary. This is obviously not objective and my personal opinion must be taken into account. My general idea is: Party I want my $2 to go to at 1 (wikileaks), who have a small chance of getting a seat and then the Sex Party who also have a small chance. Then I have three general groups: Parties I agree with, parties I don't care about, and parties I oppose. I've put the Greens in between parties I agree with and don't care, because if wikileaks and sex party don't get in then my vote will eventually fall there, but before it does so, it would have gone through and given support to every party I agree with. Then I have the Labs between don't care and oppose, so that if my vote for some reason doesn't fall with the Greens (that would be if the final seat is lib v lab, but it will most likely be green v lab), then it goes to the ALP, but they are waaayyyyy down the list, saying I really didn't want to vote for you guys.
Then I have the Libs about halfway down my oppose list, below the ones I'm opposed to, but don't think have Buckley's chance, but above the ones I oppose even more than the Libs, but have a chance (One Nation, Family First and the Christians).
One vote can do all that, not just elect someone you want to elect, but also give other people you support money and send a message to the major parties about your priorities.
Wikileaks
Single issue party, open government, transparency and anti-corruption, other policies broadly left wing.
Australian Sex Party
Social libertarians, economic social welfare.
Secular Party
Pro-euthenasia, gay marriage, science, abortion, reduction of copyright, carbon tax anti-religion, internet censorship. Social democratic welfare statists.
Senator Online
No policies, all decision based on a poll via smartphone app.
Help End Mariuana Prohibition
Single issue party, does what it says on the box
Drug Law Reform Party
Single issue party, Harm Minimisation based.
Bullet Train for Australia
Single issue party, proudly have absolutely no other policies.
Australian Democrats
Used to be the party between the Libs and the Labs, now left of the Labs (the Labs went right, not the other way around).
Australian Independents
Bleeding hearts, want to save everyone, but also want to cut taxes.
Animal Justice Party
Have many policies, all for a specific animal. No other real policies, single issue party.
Stop CSG (Coal Seam Gas)
Single issue party, but widely environmentally focussed
The Greens
Environmental Socialists
Pirate Party
Yargh! Left Libertarians (reworking, not removing the welfare state)
Socialist Equity Party
Trotskyists (ie actual communists)
Katter’s Australia Party
Protectionsists. Right wing on education, immigration, social and energy policies.
Lib Dem
Proper libertarians (ie I don’t want to pay tax, but I’m also not that interested in how you spend your spare time)
Stable population party
Single issue party, don’t seem to be racist, just like their space.
Bank Reform Party
Single issue party, seem to be against “interest rate gouging” can’t really work out anything else.
Country Alliance
Anti-environment, want more boat ramps.
Building Australia Party
Pro-building industry, but other than that, apparently not crazy, light on policy though.
Smokers rights party
Single issue party, wind back restrictions on smoking introduced in the last 20 years.
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party
Single issue party, hard to read where they would stand on anything else.
Australian Voice Party
Crazy, mainly seem to be anti-politician, fairly incoherent.
Shooters and Fishers
GUNS! GUNS! EVERYWHERE GUNS!
Palmer United Party
Policy focus is remaking 90s disaster films, next to be “Waterworld”.
Australian Republicans
Libertarians, but policy is too light to know what kind of libertarians.
Australian Labor Party
Lost the plot
Democratic Labour Party
Racist, homophobic, but not crazy, and at least they know how to spell Labour.
Stop The Greens (outdoor recreation party)
Basically want to use national parks as bogan playgrounds. Libertarian leaning.
Citizens Electoral Council
La Rouche! (Crazy)
NICHOLLS, Bob
Hey ma! I’m on the ballot!
TOSCANAO, Joseph
*shrug* wanted his name on the ballot?
Lin GUNTER
My name is on the ballot in the right order!
Daniel Scott MORRISON
I’m last! That’s got to get me a few votes right! Reverse donkey FTW!
Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party
Low tax libertarians (ie don’t tell me to pay tax, but I’ll tell you how to live), very few specific policies beyond fishing laws.
Lib/Nats
Crazy, but has nice pants.
No carbon tax climate skeptics
Single issue party, and they’re wrong on the single issue.
Rise Up Australia
Homophobic, racist, crazy
One Nation
Homophobic, racist, Crazy
Family First
Homophobic, racist, crazy
Australian Christian Party
No.
Many people may see this as onerous, I revel in the opportunity to have such a say over the make up of my parliament.

Ballot for the Senate
For the "I don't care" or "I don't know" voters, you only have to number one box. If that person doesn't get a seat, then they get to choose where your vote goes next. I don't like this, so I number all the boxes (you must number either 1 or at least 90% for the ballot to be valid).
Follows is an FB PSA I just wrote up:
There's lots of funny shenanigans going on with preferences this election (including, I'm sure, some parties that have been created specifically to funnel preferences), this means that voting below the line is more important than ever, unfortunately, there's a bazillion candidates, so who is gonna read all that (again, I'm pretty sure it's an anti-democratic plot by the majors).
Your 1 vote gives the person/party $2.31, provided they get 4% of the vote, so prioritise the person/party who you want to keep going; even without getting elected there's things that can be done with that money (like advocacy).
I've just read through ALL the policies and have given each a one line summary. This is obviously not objective and my personal opinion must be taken into account. My general idea is: Party I want my $2 to go to at 1 (wikileaks), who have a small chance of getting a seat and then the Sex Party who also have a small chance. Then I have three general groups: Parties I agree with, parties I don't care about, and parties I oppose. I've put the Greens in between parties I agree with and don't care, because if wikileaks and sex party don't get in then my vote will eventually fall there, but before it does so, it would have gone through and given support to every party I agree with. Then I have the Labs between don't care and oppose, so that if my vote for some reason doesn't fall with the Greens (that would be if the final seat is lib v lab, but it will most likely be green v lab), then it goes to the ALP, but they are waaayyyyy down the list, saying I really didn't want to vote for you guys.
Then I have the Libs about halfway down my oppose list, below the ones I'm opposed to, but don't think have Buckley's chance, but above the ones I oppose even more than the Libs, but have a chance (One Nation, Family First and the Christians).
One vote can do all that, not just elect someone you want to elect, but also give other people you support money and send a message to the major parties about your priorities.
Wikileaks
Single issue party, open government, transparency and anti-corruption, other policies broadly left wing.
Australian Sex Party
Social libertarians, economic social welfare.
Secular Party
Pro-euthenasia, gay marriage, science, abortion, reduction of copyright, carbon tax anti-religion, internet censorship. Social democratic welfare statists.
Senator Online
No policies, all decision based on a poll via smartphone app.
Help End Mariuana Prohibition
Single issue party, does what it says on the box
Drug Law Reform Party
Single issue party, Harm Minimisation based.
Bullet Train for Australia
Single issue party, proudly have absolutely no other policies.
Australian Democrats
Used to be the party between the Libs and the Labs, now left of the Labs (the Labs went right, not the other way around).
Australian Independents
Bleeding hearts, want to save everyone, but also want to cut taxes.
Animal Justice Party
Have many policies, all for a specific animal. No other real policies, single issue party.
Stop CSG (Coal Seam Gas)
Single issue party, but widely environmentally focussed
The Greens
Environmental Socialists
Pirate Party
Yargh! Left Libertarians (reworking, not removing the welfare state)
Socialist Equity Party
Trotskyists (ie actual communists)
Katter’s Australia Party
Protectionsists. Right wing on education, immigration, social and energy policies.
Lib Dem
Proper libertarians (ie I don’t want to pay tax, but I’m also not that interested in how you spend your spare time)
Stable population party
Single issue party, don’t seem to be racist, just like their space.
Bank Reform Party
Single issue party, seem to be against “interest rate gouging” can’t really work out anything else.
Country Alliance
Anti-environment, want more boat ramps.
Building Australia Party
Pro-building industry, but other than that, apparently not crazy, light on policy though.
Smokers rights party
Single issue party, wind back restrictions on smoking introduced in the last 20 years.
Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party
Single issue party, hard to read where they would stand on anything else.
Australian Voice Party
Crazy, mainly seem to be anti-politician, fairly incoherent.
Shooters and Fishers
GUNS! GUNS! EVERYWHERE GUNS!
Palmer United Party
Policy focus is remaking 90s disaster films, next to be “Waterworld”.
Australian Republicans
Libertarians, but policy is too light to know what kind of libertarians.
Australian Labor Party
Lost the plot
Democratic Labour Party
Racist, homophobic, but not crazy, and at least they know how to spell Labour.
Stop The Greens (outdoor recreation party)
Basically want to use national parks as bogan playgrounds. Libertarian leaning.
Citizens Electoral Council
La Rouche! (Crazy)
NICHOLLS, Bob
Hey ma! I’m on the ballot!
TOSCANAO, Joseph
*shrug* wanted his name on the ballot?
Lin GUNTER
My name is on the ballot in the right order!
Daniel Scott MORRISON
I’m last! That’s got to get me a few votes right! Reverse donkey FTW!
Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party
Low tax libertarians (ie don’t tell me to pay tax, but I’ll tell you how to live), very few specific policies beyond fishing laws.
Lib/Nats
Crazy, but has nice pants.
No carbon tax climate skeptics
Single issue party, and they’re wrong on the single issue.
Rise Up Australia
Homophobic, racist, crazy
One Nation
Homophobic, racist, Crazy
Family First
Homophobic, racist, crazy
Australian Christian Party
No.
Many people may see this as onerous, I revel in the opportunity to have such a say over the make up of my parliament.
(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 08:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 12:12 (UTC)Althought I kinda want Pauline to get a seat so the Chaser boys can have some good material ... ;)
(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 12:25 (UTC)Minor party nutjobs are good for democracy, they keep the crazies out of the parties that actually run the joint.
Is your issue with wikileaks an issue with Julian Assange? I can understand that. If it's a policy issue then I'd be interested to hear.
In all honesty, I probably closer align with the Sex Party than Wikileaks, they're both *very* similar, just with different priorities (essentially it's a personal freedom vs. government transparency priority, they both believe in pretty identical things, just different emphasis). The main reason I'm voting Wikileaks is because I want to see elected a guy who is seeking asylum in another country get elected to parliament, and what that will do with things like diplomatic immunity, governments preferencing the interests of their allies over their citizens and the asylum seeker debate in general.
I voted Liberal in my first election, Labour in my second (product of upbringing, half of my family are capitalists, the other half are socialists, Anglos and Catholics). I haven't voted for either since and most likely never will again. Voting for a major party does nothing for the system. I don't know how anyone could read the policies of all the parties I've listed and come up with the idea that the Libs or the Labs best represent them. My dream world is one where they only manage to get 50% of the senate between them. I think it will happen too; it's not that young people today are necessarily better informed, but they have better access to information, which I think is going to increase minor party votes immensely. It will drastically reduce the ability of one of the major parties to reduce an election campaign down to one three word slogan.
(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 18:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 19:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 19:42 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/9/13 01:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/9/13 02:22 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/9/13 02:48 (UTC)Are you in QLD? Cos that would explain it, Campbell Newman is trying to make it so no one works for the government except LNP politicians.
(no subject)
Date: 31/8/13 19:59 (UTC)I've been trying to get at least our local officials to move to weighted balloting for years, but so far, they've actually made is worse. Currently, we have a "top two" election cycle, meaning everyone in the primaries is removed from consideration in the final election. Amazingly undemocratic!
(no subject)
Date: 1/9/13 01:05 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1/9/13 15:21 (UTC)This Pirate Party thingy seems to be spreading around the world like... like a computer virus!
(no subject)
Date: 2/9/13 00:43 (UTC)