What you are implying is that the criminal should be given the benefit of the doubt essentially forcing the victims, the woman and the children, to assume the risks to their safety for the benefit of the criminal. Why you think anyone is due a warning before being shot after breaking into a home is a bit baffling. Anyone attempting a home invasion realizes that being shot is a risk of breaking into someones home.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 30/5/13 18:20 (UTC)