![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Gentlemen: I believe there is a case of a serious disconnect and I need your help to clarify the situation.
What happended: Alexander Dolmatov, a member of a Russian opposition party The Other Russia (effectively a renamed National Bolshevik Party) decided to take part in a street meeting that led him to a fight with a Russian police: Dolmatov is on the right:

As a result, he got in trouble with a Russian state and decided to flight to Netherlands, where he applied for political refugee status:

Dolmatov was denied the refugee status because Dutch decided that the only danger he is facing in Russia is 500 rubles fine (about $20). As a result, Dolmatov commited suicide.
It is also important to know that Dolmatov was working in a Russian company that designed tactical missiles and had a government security clearance (minimal level - so he did not work on anything secret).
Now: a Russian journalist Oleg Kashin published an article in The New York Times implying that the West has a moral obligation "to keep doors open" to "thousands" of Russian political activists who may choose to flee Russia when they feel they can be prosecuted.
I personally think that Oleg Kashin and other Russians like him have a mistaken assumption about how the West perceives these "fighters for the democracy" in Russia. Kashin probably think that Dolmatov-type political activists are a kind of proxy fighters of the West in its mission to democratise Russia. As a result they expect the West to protect these activists from any misfortune. I also may be mistaken, so I decided to create a poll:
[Poll #1892259]
What happended: Alexander Dolmatov, a member of a Russian opposition party The Other Russia (effectively a renamed National Bolshevik Party) decided to take part in a street meeting that led him to a fight with a Russian police: Dolmatov is on the right:

As a result, he got in trouble with a Russian state and decided to flight to Netherlands, where he applied for political refugee status:
Dolmatov was denied the refugee status because Dutch decided that the only danger he is facing in Russia is 500 rubles fine (about $20). As a result, Dolmatov commited suicide.
It is also important to know that Dolmatov was working in a Russian company that designed tactical missiles and had a government security clearance (minimal level - so he did not work on anything secret).
Now: a Russian journalist Oleg Kashin published an article in The New York Times implying that the West has a moral obligation "to keep doors open" to "thousands" of Russian political activists who may choose to flee Russia when they feel they can be prosecuted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/23/opinion/a-cold-shoulder-for-russian-dissidents.html
His death is a tragedy to those who knew him and also to thousands of anti-Putin protesters who, fearing persecution, have hoped that the West would offer them a haven.
During the cold war, Western public opinion was resolutely on the side of harboring persecuted Soviet dissidents. But as the European Union has drawn closer to Russia economically, interest in Russian human rights has waned, except when developments are so outrageous — like the assassination of the journalist Anna Politkovskaya in 2006 — that they cannot be ignored. If the West’s doors remain closed, more Russian dissidents will become victims of the state — or die by their own hands.
I personally think that Oleg Kashin and other Russians like him have a mistaken assumption about how the West perceives these "fighters for the democracy" in Russia. Kashin probably think that Dolmatov-type political activists are a kind of proxy fighters of the West in its mission to democratise Russia. As a result they expect the West to protect these activists from any misfortune. I also may be mistaken, so I decided to create a poll:
[Poll #1892259]
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:14 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:36 (UTC)Or Frau Radulova, at the very least.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:33 (UTC)A. Police (anti-extremist department) came to his apartment with a search warrant
B. FSB called him in for questioning.
C. He claimed that he was threatened there.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:38 (UTC)http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/23/opinion/a-cold-shoulder-for-russian-dissidents.html
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:44 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 01:42 (UTC)D. In Russia, there are some scientists who were accused of espionage
and who were without access to any state secrets
and all of them spent more than 10 years in prison
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 02:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 02:24 (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevik_Party
The founder of this party - Eduard Limonov is a well-known writer who lived for several years in the United States - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Limonov
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 17:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 03:32 (UTC)/maybe I've been watching too many previews of The Americans
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 03:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 05:25 (UTC)In general I don't think street protesters earn special protection - other countries have their own problems to attend to.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 05:15 (UTC)there is a plenty of russian guys sucking Putin's dick for free
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 05:35 (UTC)This post is about a misperception of some Russian folks. Please re-read what I wrote:
Do you see any mention of Putin in my text?
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 06:05 (UTC)Actually, you have distorted the context of Dolmatov's history
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 07:08 (UTC)Why do you think I distorted the context of Dolmatov's story?
I presented the elements I considered essential and included a link to Kashin's article.
I don't think the immigration office in Netherlands has means to accurately distinguish between the real and exaggerated threats based on Dolmatov's words.
If you wish, you can present your version of the story and I will insert it into my post.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 07:59 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 08:11 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 09:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 11:20 (UTC)How come, whenever a Russian guy writes a post here on some Russian subject, a whole bunch of Russian LJ-ers who've never previously appeared around here, suddenly pop out of nowhere?
Do you have a theory about this?
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 12:46 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 12:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 14:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 14:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 14:06 (UTC)I, for example, have a red emergency flashlight mounted above my monitor.
:) He's on my friend list.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 17:15 (UTC)try to respond it, collecting several words in a short sentence,just for the purpose of English practice.My idea
concerning this very post is that this article is a part of Russian authorities propaganda campaign aiming to creat
negative attitude towards Russian opposition among western democratic public.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 17:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 18:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 19:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 23:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 19:23 (UTC)negative attitude towards Russian opposition among western democratic public.***
Are you implying that any opinion different from your own is likely to be a "Russian authorities propaganda campaign aiming to create negative attitude towards Russian opposition among western democratic public" ?
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 23:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 23:33 (UTC)Besides, your theory about me is pure nonsense. I am a US citizen with a long track record in the US electronic industry. My name appeared in Electronic Engineering Times and in Los Angeles Times. I don't have any financial need or a motivation to getting paid for posting anything on the net.
(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 11:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 16:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 17:58 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/1/13 18:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29/1/13 21:12 (UTC)I'd investigate him, sure, but then I'd probably let him move to my country, which would probably look like:
"At least he should get a Green Card, basic food and shelter, medical insurance, food stamps"
I'm not big on closed borders in general.