[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Glenn Beck Defends Gay Marriage: Republicans Need To 'Expand Our Own Horizon'
http://www.businessinsider.com/glenn-beck-defends-gay-marriage-video-2012-12#ixzz2Em5wKk7K

"Conservative firebrand Glenn Beck has joined a growing chorus of Republican commentators in defending gay marriage, laying out a strong case for ending government opposition to letting same-sex couples wed."
...
""Let me take the pro-gay marriage people and the religious people - I believe that there is a connecting dot there that nobody is looking at, and that's the Constitution," Beck said during a recent segment of his online talk show. "The question is not whether gay people should be married or not. The question is why is the government involved in our marriage?""
...
""What we need to do, I think, as people who believe in the Constitution, is to start looking for allies who believe in the Constitution and expand our own horizon," Beck said. "We would have the ultimate big tent.""

Amazing, right? Mr Beck has started coming around to positions traditionally held by authentic libertarians for a long time - and not for the "gay rights" reason mind you, but for a constitutional reason. A moment of sanity/consistency/sincerity perhaps? Or simply a realization that you can't win hearts and minds (and elections) by remaining stuck in a 19th century mindset (and respectively, acknowledging the need to pander to wider segments of the electorate)? But shut up, cynical me! I'm sure he's speaking out of pure principle, being the true libertarian that he is. Yes, it must be that!

Somehow reminds me of Hannity and Rand Paul and all the rest of that circus who suddenly gradually "evolved" on immigration in the aftermath of the election. Because, you see, the GOP has no problem with the dynamically shifting demographics in America, noooo. No way it can have that problem. The election defeat was simply a result from bad campaign management, and failure to bring the messages to the public. Right? That's what I'm being told. What... why are you shaking your head? Oh well...

But it's not like Glenn hasn't displayed some consistency on this issue. Remember an interview at O'Reilly's place a couple of years ago, when Glenn revealed himself as the socialist commie Marxist Alinsky-ite that he is, saying that "gay marriage doesn't harm anything"?

Don't know if that was a genuine moment of sanity from Glenn, but O'Reilly must've looked at him in dismay and blinked a couple of times with bewilderment. How come such a staunch conservative mouthpiece had suddenly budged on this issue? Wasn't Jesus supposed to be hatin' on f**s anyway? YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN THAT!

It was nearly fascinating to watch how, referring to gay marriage, Beck quoted Jefferson's famous phrase "It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg". Well, HELLO! Took you a while to realize that, eh? Better late than never.

But the backlash has been even more hilarious.

Citation from the latter link:

"There you have it. Beck doesn't care about one of the most blatant and despicable examples of judicial tyranny in the history of our country. He doesn't care about the institution of marriage and its 5,000-year history. He doesn't care that the Bible says God created marriage way back in Genesis and that Jesus affirmed that. He doesn't care that the family is the building block of a society and that smarter men have explained how you simply can't have freedom and self-governance without it. He also doesn't seem to care about what might become of children adopted into such unions."

Well, good thing he doesn't have to care. Cuz all those arguments are either irrelevant (laws aren't based on the Bible, and neither should they be), or outright idiotic (yeah, "gay marriage will destroy Teh Family, OMGZ! Cats sleeping with dogs, and all that!").

Either way, Beck has shown such a tremendous (for a conservative, anyway) ability to evolve on issues, he'd make Darwin proud. Like his worship of MLK, Mandela, F Douglass and Lincoln. At this evolution rate, he might actually run as the Democratic presidential nominee in 4 years! ;-)
Page 1 of 6 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 15:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
The question is why is the government involved in our marriage?

That's right up there with Craig Nelson's "I was on welfare! Nobody ever gave me nothin'!" The government is involved in your marriage because marriage is a legal institution you fuckwit.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 15:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
Don't know how genuinely libertarian Beck was/is/had been, but he surely did try to dance by the Tea Party tune for a while (as long as it suited him), especially as the movement was being born and still looked like something resembling grassroots, i.e. in the waning times of the Bushonian administration when being pissed with W was pretty much mainstream. Not sure how genuine that was, though. He couldn't even dare to support a paleoconservative like Ron Paul.



Yeah, libertarianism being conservatism with a human face - my ass.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 15:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
What, there are people who are still listening to Glenn Beck?

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 15:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Stop the presses! Glenn Beck has seen... A DOT! :-O

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 15:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
He'll still have all that BS in his genes. He can't be saved.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 16:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
I'm not all that surprised, that he would show some rational traits on occasion.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 16:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnny9fingers.livejournal.com
You mean a pension rights, healthcare, and inheritance sort of legal institution that gay folk have been going on about for years? Surely not.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 17:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
How is this evolution? He's just gone from one Holy Book to another.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 17:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chron-job.livejournal.com
Glenn Beck is essentially a fictional character to me, so trying to analyze what is 'in his heart' is just a metaphor / projection of my theories about conservatives in general.

That being said, a significant minority really and truly don't really care about social concerns that do not impinge on their lives... but conservative politics are authority driven, and message discipline is more important than among their opposite numbers on the left. They are in a coalition with social conservatives, so they all have to toe the Social Conservative line, to some extent.

Open questioning of the Anti Gay Marriage plank = beneath the surface wrangling over the preeminence of the Religious right faction of the coalition, just as open questioning of immigration reform plank = beneath the surface wrangling over the preeminence of the nativist faction within the coalition.

It's more about where the power nodes in the coalition are, than about what is in any pundit's heart.

Edited Date: 13/12/12 17:30 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 17:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] american-geist.livejournal.com
The conservative movement will need to find a new scapegoat to con their fleet of easy-marks. Who will it be? Muslims would be my guess, but who knows what these crazy kids will come up with.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 17:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
1 million+ monthly listeners.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 17:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
Glenn Beck's career has involved more frantic changes of tune than a performance of Handel's Messiah sung by the National Tourrettes Association.

His accountant must have shown him something unpleasant.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
Kept hearing endlessly how conservatives needed to evolve on certain issues (they do), but apparently the only reason behind urging them to do so was to mock them as they did.

Damned if you do...

Not a follower of Beck, but I have said basically the same thing about gay marriage that he did for quite awhile now. Not that it earns any favor with those whom I still disagree with on the economic left who may yet find agreement with me on a variety of social issues.

It's one of those things that leads me to conclude that rah-rah team politics isn't better personified by one political label or another.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oportet.livejournal.com
I'll give him his due - he has moved up from broken record to broken clock. Then again, maybe he's just a broken clock radio now - I guess it's time our idioms evolved as well. I forgot where I was going with that, I bet it was somewhere nice though.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texasskier.livejournal.com
Leviticus 20:13- “If a man lies with another man he should be stoned."

What will be a ground for GOP, if not Christians? Gays? They are already occupied.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jerseycajun.livejournal.com
Marriage as a legal institution is nothing more than a variant of contract law and has no bearing on the spiritual and religious aspects of marriage. It would be better to just rename what the law does in that capacity to more accurately reflect what the real function it performs, is.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
A genuine sea change would be welcome. Beck's history however, is akin to Romney's in that both have a well-established record of convenient position switches.

The Mormon Church finally decided that things like funding Prop. 8 in California and in general, hating on gays, was no longer acceptable and Beck is just following their lead.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 18:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
Contracts between you and me do not grant me legal rights from the government, like lower taxes, probate rights, or the like. This urge to oversimplify marriage to a contract between A and B, when it's really an agreement between A, B, and the government in which all of them gain privileges, doesn't help things.

I understand the urge to have civil unions be separated from marriage, but I feel like it's unnecessary. Words sometimes have different meanings in different contexts; marriage is one of those.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 19:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
The difference between you and Glenn Beck (rather, the SALIENT difference in this discussion) is that there is no evidence whatsoever that Beck believes in anything other than "Glenn Beck likes being rich" and whatever abuse of his talents wil achieve that.

When I first became aware of him, he was playing at being a plain spoken moderate. Then Obama was elected and he went full on batshit. Then he added a layer of devout Christian to that. Now he's walking it back on gay marriage.

Madonna's image in the early 1990s was more stable than this.

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 19:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] texasskier.livejournal.com
Glenn Beck Defends Gay Marriage

I thought it is not about lesbian marriage. Ho-ho!

(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 19:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Contracts between you and me do not grant me legal rights from the government

Shouldn't they? That to me seems to be the crux of the whole argument.

If I want to sign a contract that makes someone not related to me by blood my "next of kin" shouldn't I be allowed to do so, and shouldn't society honor that contract? Likewise if the Government want to reward people who live in nuclear family units with lower taxes that's their perogative. I just don't see what "Marriage" as a social or religious construct has to do with it.


(no subject)

Date: 13/12/12 19:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
I thought that was a requirement.
Page 1 of 6 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] >>

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30