http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2012/11/15/romney-obama-won-with-gifts-to-certain-voters/1706223/
"Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is telling top donors that President Barack Obama won re-election because of the "gifts" he had already provided to blacks, Hispanics and young voters and because of the president's effort to paint Romney as anti-immigrant."
"Among the "gifts" Romney cited were free health care "in perpetuity," which he said was highly motivational to black and Hispanic voters as well as for voters making $25,000 to $35,000 a year.
Romney also said the administration's promise to offer what he called "amnesty" to the children of illegal immigrants — what he termed "the so-called DREAM Act kids" — helped send Hispanics to the polls for Obama."
---
It's one thing to see this from insane Beck commenters, but another to see it from Romney himself. This call was to donors and you could say he had the incentive to say things like this, but if the higher ups in the Republican party honestly believe the "Obama won because he's giving away free stuff to blacks and latinos" line, we're going to see a Democrat in the White House in 2016.
"Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is telling top donors that President Barack Obama won re-election because of the "gifts" he had already provided to blacks, Hispanics and young voters and because of the president's effort to paint Romney as anti-immigrant."
"Among the "gifts" Romney cited were free health care "in perpetuity," which he said was highly motivational to black and Hispanic voters as well as for voters making $25,000 to $35,000 a year.
Romney also said the administration's promise to offer what he called "amnesty" to the children of illegal immigrants — what he termed "the so-called DREAM Act kids" — helped send Hispanics to the polls for Obama."
---
It's one thing to see this from insane Beck commenters, but another to see it from Romney himself. This call was to donors and you could say he had the incentive to say things like this, but if the higher ups in the Republican party honestly believe the "Obama won because he's giving away free stuff to blacks and latinos" line, we're going to see a Democrat in the White House in 2016.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 13:18 (UTC)The ruins of the Reichstag satisfied (c)Obama's victory is satisfied(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 13:54 (UTC)Did I miss your quip?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:37 (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 17/11/12 19:47 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 14:02 (UTC)Yeah. It's a bitch when the POTUS treats all Americans like Americans instead of only a select subset that liked to call themselves "The Real America (http://www.chicagonow.com/chicanisima-latino-politics-news-and-culture/2012/11/obama-won-in-the-real-america/)".
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 15:15 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:03 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 15:25 (UTC)There's an absolutely outlandish claim.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:36 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 15:49 (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 16/11/12 01:20 (UTC)(By the way, most of the conservative pundits I have heard, think his assessment is wrong, and since the voter turnout was actually lower this time in "targeted" groups he probably is wrong. I admit that my initial reaction (given how "we" voted in Ca.) ran very much along those lines....I am currently reassessing)
(frozen) (no subject)
From:(frozen) (no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 15:53 (UTC)I could understand that. They spent 400 million of their own money to get him in the White House and all they got was a second Obama administration.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 15:55 (UTC)Also: Is Dick Morris out of a job yet?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:04 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 22:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:29 (UTC)and:
Ooga Booga Booga (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/15/charlie-webster-maine-gop_n_2136055.html?ref=topbar)
I used to think some of my fellow Democrats were pretty wacky during the Bush years.
I'd forgotten how unhinged some Republicans can get while they are busy sucking their thumbs in fear of Black Helicopters and the UN.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:33 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:39 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 16:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:04 (UTC)But doesn't everyone like free stuff? Except for that baby on the Capital One commercials.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:07 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:10 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:35 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 17:39 (UTC)Glad he didn't get the job then.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 20:34 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 21:32 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 21:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/11/12 02:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 21:42 (UTC)OK. Looking at demography I suppose Republican party should be paid off. No chances for future.
(no subject)
Date: 15/11/12 22:32 (UTC)From the article:
(no subject)
Date: 16/11/12 00:23 (UTC)Side note: Autocorrect on my iPad keeps trying to change "Jindal" to "Mondale".
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 16/11/12 03:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 16/11/12 18:38 (UTC)See, the appropriate response from those of us not part of the 1% is a zen-like acceptance of the fact that many of us are going to have to work possibly over 40 hours a week for the rest of our lives (forget retirement) in order to merely survive. We just need to understand that little sacrifices like getting very, very sick, much sicker than we would if we could actually afford a physician, becoming disabled,and possibly even dying prematurely are all a part of supporting "job creators" right to build fabulous mansions with moats and car elevators.
I mean, really, food, shelter, clothing, it's all so sordidly materialistic. Shouldn't those of us in the 99% think of higher, purer things when we vote for a candidate?