[identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
Now this is a slightly different sort of scramble, though. Two ethnic communities sharing (or rather, dividing) the same island, racing for the better access to the newly found gas deposits in the sea. Sounds like a crappy reality show on TV? Nope, we're broadcasting live from Cyprus, the isle of Aphrodite.


(clicky for biggy)

The question whether the gas deposits that were discovered next to the island would stimulate a closer cooperation between the two Cypriot communities sounds rather naive, IMO. More likely the sweet natural resources will become yet another obstacle to the unification of Cyprus. The Cypriots have lived separated for almost 4 decades (since Turkish troops occupied the northern, Turk-populated part of the island). The so called Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus is only recognized by Turkey (what a shock), unlike the internationally recognized Republic of Cyprus in the southern part, populated by the Greek Cypriots.

The stakes have grown immensely higher, now that gas has been found in the Levantine basin, and that's additionally fueling the tensions in a region that's already unstable enough. Mostly because of the traditionally strained relations between Greece and Turkey, and now between Turkey and Israel. There's a lot of money in the gas game: the latest geological explorations indicate that there are approx. 3.5 billion m3 of gas deposits around the Cypriot shores. That amount should be enough to match the entire global demand for a year. The thing is, as you can see from the map, the northern portion of the deposit is in Cypriot territorial waters while the rest is in Israeli and Lebanese waters. Remember the Turkish "aid" armada that was stopped by the Israelis with force? Smells like gas, or not? Well, to put this in further context, the US oil/gas company Noble Energy that's doing the drilling, has already confirmed the presence of 991 million m3 of gas, of which 1/5 is in Cypriot waters.

The Americans are presently working with their Israeli partners under a license that was issued by the Greek Cypriot authorities. And while the Greek Cypriots consider that part of the shelf their own, the Turk Cypriots claim that the drilling is illegal, as it's happening without their approval (and more importantly, without their participation). And that's no small matter, because I'm sure we remember the claim of Iraq that the Kuwaitis had been drilling their oil from beneath their shared border, which was largely what triggered the First Gulf War. Anyway. In turn, Turkey has threatened to send more ships to the region, and this time not humanitarian but military ones. This has revived the concerns of a possible escalation of the tensions on that front. There are even rumors of a new war brewing, this time because of Cyprus.

The UN has already stated that they're viewing the new gas field as a source of income, which could help finance the unification of the island. The US has declared their support for a just distribution of the resources, but in practice they're openly supporting the internationally recognized government of the Greek Cypriots (the Republic of Cyprus being part of the EU, and all). By 2020 Israel could be extracting gas worth 2-3 billion dollars annually (by current prices), the forecast says. And of course the closest possible market is Turkey, which entirely depends on the import of gas and oil. So you can imagine how Turkey feels about the prospect of being dependent for energy on Israel.

Despite the protests from the Turk Cypriot authorities about the one-sided exploitation of the gas deposits, 15 companies and corporations (including the US company Marathon Oil, the Italian Enel, etc) have applied for license for drilling in 9 new shelf sectors. Turkey is warning the applicants that they won't let them access the Turkish energy market in any shape or form, and confirms they'd keep supporting the Turk Cypriots and their territorial claims.

Thus, the more the drilling for gas expands in the region, the more fuel is being poured into the fire of the never-ending conflict between the two sides, and in the broader perspective, between Turkey and Israel - a conflict that's been boiling with a gradually increasing intensity in recent years. The long-time friendly relations between those two were severely cooled down after that little episode with the humanitarian flotilla that was sent to Gaza. It tried to sneak through the Israeli blockade and in response the Israeli special forces tried to board the ship, where they were met with knives and guns. 9 aid activists died in the melee, most of them Turkish citizens. Israel has viewed Cyprus as its major partner in the region instead of Turkey, ever since.

And of course this extends way beyond the mere skirmishes, because Turkey is now assuming a bolder stance in the region, trying to assert a position of a regional leader, an arbiter and an insurmountable geopolitical factor both for the Middle East and Europe, including in the energy sector (think the oil and gas pipelines that are supposed to connect Central Asia, Russia and the Caspian to ever hungry Europe). And Israel is certainly not liking this shift of the power balance, and this, plus the hunger for resources, is one of the reasons for the increasing passive-aggressiveness of the relations between most players in the region. Now Cyprus finding itself in the middle of it all. The heavier pieces on the chessboard have started moving now, and the stakes are high. Those will be interesting times.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 14:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
Israel didn't wait for too long to start creating its alliance to counter Turkey's growing influence.
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/israels-new-allies-6441

"Today's realities—which include both already radicalized and radicalizing neighboring Arab states and parties and increasingly militant non-Arab Muslim states in an outer ring (Turkey, Iran, Pakistan)—have prompted Israel to expand its concept of the potentially friendly or even aligned "periphery" to include such states as Azerbaijan, India, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania and (Greek) Cyprus."

We're not only living in interesting times, but we here are living at an interesting place, I'm afraid.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 15:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
Any chance that Israel and its rivals meet the 2012 deadline for the Mayan/Biblical Armageddon?

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 18:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandwichwarrior.livejournal.com
Off course there's a chance.

Rumor on the Milblogs is that the Isreali hardliners are not too pleased with the current administration and the recent riots have them jumpy. Baraka is with the islamists and there is an increasing sentiment that Isreal will either need to surrender ground (both political and physical) or go on the offensive.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 13:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
God help them if they have to fight real soldiers again. Their advantage of the past of having the only combat-hardened veteran leadership in the region no longer exists. And when both sides are equally inexperienced, this favors in the long term the side with the greater quantity. Which is not Israel.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 01:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
The Mayan armageddon is not political, it's geophysical.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 07:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
Please never tell me again that conservatives have a sense of humor.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 22:26 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Just because I ignored that you were joking doesn't mean I didn't see it or understand it. Also, libertarian =/= conservative.

(no subject)

Date: 20/9/12 07:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
Yeah yeah right.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 13:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
This is Turkey we're talking about, meeting deadlines is not what they do. ;P

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 15:35 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvdovz.livejournal.com
The fight for domination in the East Mediterranean has brought Turkey on the confrontation path with most of its neighbors. Including some of its traditional best trade partners. This can't end well for them.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 16:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
I love the nomenclature: the Leviathan off the coast of Israel and Aphrodite off the coast of Cyprus.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 17:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
Israel has about twice the military power of Turkey, let me guess who's going to win the pissing contest in Cyprus.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 17:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] peamasii.livejournal.com
It's not that force would need to actually get used, but the scales would tip in their favor.

(no subject)

Date: 18/9/12 18:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allhatnocattle.livejournal.com
In terms of non-military force Israel has great influence over USA policy but little elsewhere. But Turkey has significant non-military influence.

It's only when military force is used or at least threatened that the scales tip in Israel's favour. But since we agree that Israel doesn't want that sort of confrontation then the scales is clearly in Turkey's favour.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 13:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Actually it's not. If Israel ensures NATO cracks, Israel's not only contributed to a far worse isolation but may not even do all that well against the Turks. Turkey, after all, was and is a member of NATO, and you don't get there without some serious skill. Israel has beaten armies led by idiots, but it had its last war against a serious military power in the 1980s, and the PLO was like all the other Arab armies it faced: handicapped by idiots in charge of it. As such inexperience applies to both sides, and we'll be rapidly disillusioned that Israel was ever all that special in terms of military power in the region. Which is the real reason it won't go to war, the loss of its military delusions of grandeur will be the equivalent of the Battle of Hattin in terms of psychological terms even though in practical terms Hamas and the PNA haven't a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything about it.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 03:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
Turkey is a member of NATO. If Israel attacks Turkey, other NATO countries are expected to help. Yeah, nobody wants this.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 13:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Russia, as this means the USA has to break up NATO. Israel goes to war with a NATO power, that technically means the USA has to go to war with Israel. The USA will never do that, as Israel can get away with everything up to and including genocidal policies with the USA's current tolerance for it, and so such a war results in both the collapse of NATO and a mostly naval war that arguably goes either way.

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 18:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] terminator44.livejournal.com
In the air, maybe. On the ground, sure. At sea, no. The Turks have more submarines and surface combatants, having a 2:1 ratio or more in most categories. Israel might have a technological edge, but it isn't large enough to make up for such a disparity in numbers. Turkey's navy is very much modern. Turkey also has extensive amphibious warfare capabilities while Israel has virtually none. As underlankers has pointed out, they will both have the same level of experience. If this conflict will mainly be on the sea, and no other parties take part in it, then Turkey is more likely to win.
Edited Date: 19/9/12 18:27 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 19/9/12 13:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
There won't be a war over this. If there is one the USA will fracture NATO rather than go to war with Israel, meaning that the EU states will begin having to rearm themselves without Uncle Sam's military and nuclear umbrella (and my prediction is the anti-cluster bomb treaty will similarly be reversed), Israel will be isolated even moreso, and given both its navy and that of Turkey haven't fought a serious war in a very long time that the mutual inexperience factor favors Israel's enemies. Israel can't risk a war that would show its military power to be quaker guns and wishful thinking, and that's just what this war would do. It'd be the Yom Kippur War on a bigger scale.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

February 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
23 45 678
9101112 131415
16 171819 202122
23 242526 2728