(no subject)
24/8/12 23:01 Johnson shot only his intended victim. All of the bystanders were hit or grazed by police bullets.
Now I get that these NYPD are a little zealous given that 9/11 happened on their turf. I completely understand the anniversary is coming up in mere weeks causing tensions to be on high alert. So the fact that cops shot at a bystander is somewhat excusable. But that ALL bystanders were shot at by police protecting and serving is inexcusable.
There is something seriously wrong in the psychology of that particular NYPD precinct. Maybe the training there sucks. Maybe it's the ghosts that still haunt downtown Manhattan. Maybe it's that most downtown cops are on tourist duty; answering silly questions and locating lost children and luggage.
Jeffery Johnson committed a criminal act shooting his former manager. And he inadvertently caused a mass panic. But this is not right. Not right at all. Cops are supposed to quell fears and calm crowds. They shouldn't shoot at them all willy-nilly.
Now I get that these NYPD are a little zealous given that 9/11 happened on their turf. I completely understand the anniversary is coming up in mere weeks causing tensions to be on high alert. So the fact that cops shot at a bystander is somewhat excusable. But that ALL bystanders were shot at by police protecting and serving is inexcusable.
There is something seriously wrong in the psychology of that particular NYPD precinct. Maybe the training there sucks. Maybe it's the ghosts that still haunt downtown Manhattan. Maybe it's that most downtown cops are on tourist duty; answering silly questions and locating lost children and luggage.
Jeffery Johnson committed a criminal act shooting his former manager. And he inadvertently caused a mass panic. But this is not right. Not right at all. Cops are supposed to quell fears and calm crowds. They shouldn't shoot at them all willy-nilly.
(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 05:09 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 05:12 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 05:21 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 05:33 (UTC)Look, I agree that tasers are often used against the wrong kind of people. But if a Taser company told me to reach for a taser when the suspect is reaching for a .45? I believe I will decline.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 07:01 (UTC)My point is that in this instance the actions of the police were obviously erroneous. No matter if they fired into the crowd, or fired past the culprit only to have bullet bounce off the marble and wing nine innocents, both situations are completely unacceptable.
To have one or two bullets accidentally hit bystanders is unfortunate yet plausible and understandable. By the time the ninth bullet hit a bystander it's pretty clear that the police officers in question completely disregarded the public's safety.
No doubt you won't be the only person to defend what happened there. I am trying to understand what happened. Nine ricochet's is a shitty excuse. Traumatized cops hyper alert isn't a good excuse either. Bad training or being rookies ain't gonna cut it either. This situation is bad all around. I find it indefensible.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 07:31 (UTC)Pardon?
(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 14:59 (UTC)Questions race through cops mind; Is gunman alone? I can understand if they shot at bystander that might be reaching for a gun or maybe it's a celphone. Yes, under these circumstances, I think it's somewhat excusable.
(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 08:15 (UTC)I'm hardly one to defend the NYPD. But I don't know in this case.
Yes, police need to use caution when shooting their guns with lots of people around. Yes, police need to shoot at a man who just killed a person and is aiming the gun he used to commit that murder at you (or others in the crowd).
(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 14:28 (UTC)Yep, I read the same thing, : Johnson drew his gun (at police) but didn't fire. Officers shot at Johnson in total of 16 times from 8ft away. Johnson's body was only hit 10 times. The other bullets went stray. To me that's not just shoot to wound or shoot to kill. That's a bit crazy.
The two cops approached Johnson, who drew his gun, turned and pointed it directly at the officers from about eight feet (2.4 meters) away, police said. Police opened fire and shot him, Police Department spokesman Paul Browne told reporters.
One officer fired nine times and the other seven times, Browne said. Investigators believe Johnson was shot seven times; his body had 10 bullets wounds, three of which were believed to be exit wounds, Browne said. (http://www.torontosun.com/2012/08/24/shooting-near-empire-state-building)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 09:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 09:41 (UTC)Especially when those people are carrying machetes.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 12:37 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 26/8/12 04:30 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 12:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 14:40 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 18:28 (UTC)One of the reasons he said he knew it was time to get out was the number of times a day a cop would put a round into the clearing barrel when they transitioned from revolvers to Glocks. He said it took weeks--even after their transition training--for most cops to understand that there was still one in the chamber...
To be honest, unless they're SWAT or otherwise a "firearm enthusiast", many police officers are almost as daft at operating handguns as a half-trained civilian except for those specific tasks they are repetitively trained for like drawing from the specialized holsters they carry. So, definitely more practice for most of them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 13:25 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 14:41 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 16:56 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 18:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 17:04 (UTC)Obviously this looks really bad for the police - shooting/grazing 9 innocent bystanders while Johnson shot 1.
But, to be fair:
- Johnson killed 1. The police killed 1 (Johnson).
- Johnson aimed his gun at an officer.
- We don't know the extent of the injuries incurred by the bystanders.
- We don't know the trajectories of the bullets that hit the bystanders.
- We don't know the specifics of the situation the police faced when they shot.
- There's a lot we don't know.
So it might not be as bad as it seems. But even given all that, hitting 9 bystanders while Johnson only hit 1 seems indefensible.
(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 17:30 (UTC)I don't pretend to know the details either. I am perfectly willing to accept the unfortunate circumstances of "collateral damage" (to use a military term). From what the mayor said it seems like he's pretty confident that the 9 bystanders suffered pretty minor injuries which is probably best explained by slowed trajectories of richochet or passing through the suspect (there is said to be 7 entry and 3 exit wounds). One girl was shot in the foot. But I can only make educated guess from limited information broadcast on the news.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 17:45 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 20:10 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25/8/12 22:43 (UTC)