[identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-04-16/tokyo-s-ishihara-seeks-to-buy-senkaku-islands-claimed-by-china

Tokyo Governor Shintaro Ishihara is interested in using public funds to buy the Senkaku Islands, whose ownership is disputed by China, a Tokyo Metropolitan Government spokesman said.

Ishihara, 79, has begun talks to purchase Uotsurijima, Kitakojima and Minamikojima, all in the Senkaku island chain around 140 kilometers (87 miles) north of Japan’s Ishigaki Island, between Taiwan and Okinawa. He would use funds from the municipal budget to buy the real estate from a Japanese citizen, spokesman Motoyuki Nakazawa said, citing comments Ishihara made in a speech in Washington April 16.


Now what's interesting here is that he not only made this announcement in Washington, but did so at an event hosted by the notorious rightwing think tank the Heritage Foundation. Where was a guest of honor no less. Ishihara's history as a grade of no love of foreigners and being a right wing whack job of the first order in Japanese politics so it's not as odd a team-up as one might think. Especially if the goal here is Japan being used to block Chinese expansion. Anti-China plays well politically in both the US and Japan.

Frankly, I'm pretty wary of this sort of unholy alliance. I, like many expats in Japan, hated Ishihara when I lived there since he loves to blame just about anything on foreigners. And if you know US politics there's a mountain of complaints you can level at the Heritage Foundation. Guys like this should not be meddling at the international level.

(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 12:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
I've got to guess this has more to do with nationalism than profit.

But then, if buying a piece of property is enough to affect it's soverignty, China's going to be expanding all over the place.

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 22:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] harry-beast.livejournal.com
After recent concerns about nuclear power in Japan, investing in natural gas might turn out to be very lucrative.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 18/4/12 02:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] il-mio-gufo.livejournal.com
Japan is a relatively small Island in comparison to the land-lot some other countries sit on . . . so I guess purchasing in small incruments like this seems fitting. i mean, they already purchased almost the whole of Hawaii right?

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 09:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
I don't know how buying off a couple of islands would block the Chinese expansion, but from a Japanese POV, kudos Ishihara.

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 10:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
So? Let China buy them, if they really want them. Surely they have the cash to out bid Tokyo.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 14:53 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
In that case, since Japan has had possession of the islands since the 19th century and has no intention of relinquishing them, they can either get to fighting, or stfu.

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 10:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
I got it. If he meant he's going to counter China's geopolitical and economic expansion, then buying off a few islands won't help. If he meant he's going to stop China's expansion in that particular part of the sea - then sure.

Now that you've mentioned the gas, I'm thinking China won't relinquish the island so easily and this is heading into becoming a really big deal.
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 17/4/12 12:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
I wasn't here at the time, but I'd bet a combination. The Chinese government certainly does make choices about what news people see, but then, it really doesn't take much to get some Chinese folks to hate on Japan. It's a little harder than getting an anti-Castro demonstration set up in Miami but not much.

(no subject)

Date: 18/4/12 02:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] il-mio-gufo.livejournal.com
i recommend we should all learn to do business with China very soon, in fact we should do so sooner than later ....

(no subject)

Date: 18/4/12 03:38 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] il-mio-gufo.livejournal.com
well yes a polite reminder is always welcomed in any symbiotic relationship

(no subject)

Date: 18/4/12 06:13 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
It's encouraging that you think so. :-P

(no subject)

Date: 18/4/12 08:15 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mikeyxw.livejournal.com
We can refuse to sell them t-bills next auction... oh, wait, no we can't.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
3031     

Summary