[identity profile] drblasphlemy.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/02/02/obama_announces_2012_launch_of_african-americans_for_obama.html


I got an email this afternoon telling me about this new Obama campaign tactic.
How is this ok in America today?
How is this not racist? What do you supposed would happen if Romney announced a “White Americans for Romney”?
He’d be crucified yet it’s perfectly acceptable for Obama?
Please explain to me why this is ok for a black president but no white in this country could ever do this?

(no subject)

Date: 22/2/12 16:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Not the greatest links, I didn't read the whole page, but the fact still remains that free blacks owned slaves in the south.

Here is a better page about the demographics of slave owners:
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/wahl.slavery.us

(no subject)

Date: 22/2/12 20:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Yes. How many of those slaves where white?

(no subject)

Date: 23/2/12 16:06 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 404.livejournal.com
Less than none, but that's not the point at hand.

(no subject)

Date: 23/2/12 20:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
The point at hand is that there historically an asymmetrical relationship between whites and blacks in America. It means we accept groups like "african americans for...." more readily than "white nationalists for...".

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Summary