[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics


For debate: Did Justice Sotomayor come to the correct conclusion? Is this really a ruling, or more of a settled arbitration? Did Justice Sotomayor give enough attention to the fact that Goldilocks broke the chair while in the process of a B&E?

Was justice truly served?

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/12 17:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jonathankorman.livejournal.com
When offering nonbonding arbitration, it appears that Justice Sotomayor operates from principles of restorative justice, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restorative_justice) though it's a pity that we do not see her proposed solution to the more challenging case of Pigs v. Wolf. (As [livejournal.com profile] blue_mangoes observes above, the Wolf has a much weaker claim to innocent motives than Goldilocks does, which makes a decision based solely on material interests less satisfying.)

I presume that this differs from her judicial philosophy when serving on the Court, though I hope that someone better versed in her decisions can clarify the point.

(no subject)

Date: 10/2/12 22:10 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
the Wolf has a much weaker claim to innocent motives

Wolf has a family to feed and there had been lots of straw, wood, and even brick, development in wolf's hunting territory.

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30