[identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
You see, Barbie is a bad influence for young Iranian girls!

Iran removes Barbie doll from shelves — what else do ‘morality police’ do?

"The ban on Barbie, first instituted in 1996 for the doll’s “destructive cultural and social consequences,” has since been flouted by many shopkeepers who don’t agree with the ban. But the morality police say Barbie must now be removed to protect the public from the erosion of Islamic values by Western culture."

Oh, the happy effects of a theocracy! Not that I'm particularly crazy about Barbie and the distorted body image it presents to youngsters, but control of the state by organized religion is a horror which scares Holy Cow up here (see icon).

And while we're at it, the lunacy of the likes of a particular presidential candidate with a particularly Google-able name (and his devout followers), plus the prospect of him becoming the head of state and commander in chief of the most powerful nation in the world (you know, the one who's poking its nose everywhere, whether called for or not), does indeed sound equally Holy-Cow-inducing.

But back to the extreme fundie lunacy of the theocratic state that is Iran, I'm sure some'd notice some familiar reasoning there behind that ruling. The kind of reasoning that says we want to prepare girls to become decent young women content of wearing a bag on their head (whether figuratively or literally), to not show off their physiques in public, because you know it could lure some poor males into acting like an animal, which btw would not be their fault at all. It's all the woman's fault for being sexually attractive, you know?

That said, I think Iran's morality police could've approached this situation differently. Apparently, Barbies don't think for themselves and they don't talk back - I think they could use Barbies to teach the country's youth an important lesson about getting in line with the standards of the "morality police", thus becoming an integral part of society.

Oh, and before I've forgotten, I hereby propose a modified version of Barbie, just to cater to the Iranian market - or anyone else who'd be eager to share their way of thinking, to that matter:


(no subject)

Date: 28/1/12 17:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Well, nice to know Iran is always available to do stupid things to point and laugh at.

(no subject)

Date: 28/1/12 17:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
There has been such a product (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/22/international/middleeast/22doll.html) in the Middle East for years.

(no subject)

Date: 28/1/12 19:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lai-choi-san.livejournal.com
And a must read graphic novel. :)

Image (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/18/persepolis20return.jpg/)

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/12 02:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
I love LOVE Persepolis, haven't seen the movie yet though, now I really want to.

(no subject)

Date: 28/1/12 21:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malakh-abaddon.livejournal.com
Give it a few years, it will be the same in the US. Except we won't have whacked out Islamic Fascist Fundamentalists (I call them the IFFs).... We will have whacked out Christian Fascist Fundamentalists. See common ground with out enemies and all, everyone is a whacked out fascist fundamentalist. Go figure, I just found a way for world peace. Kill religion.

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/12 02:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
I don't know what makes me sadder, Burka Barbie or seeing actual barbies thighs.

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/12 19:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
haha, okay. You took me completely by surprise on this one.

(no subject)

Date: 29/1/12 19:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
That's the idea!

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

January 2026

M T W T F S S
    12 34
5 678 91011
12 131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031