[identity profile] acollectivegood.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
It always seemed to me that it was just too easy for corporate interests, especially big oil, to promote denial and skepticism about global warming. In this day of easy access to information on the internet, I could quickly look up the funding of scientists who were publishing studies that refuted climate change theories, and I found that they almost always were receiving substantial money from big oil. Somehow companies were succeeding in "buying" this issue, but how? In the past corporate interests, even backed by tons of capital, could not always convince the public to go along with them. What was different in this case?

The more I looked into this the more it became clear. First let me say that my next sentence is NOT about those who are fiscally conservative due to a well reasoned understanding of economics, and its not about those who are socially conservative because that is where their morals and ideals led them - I fully respect those groups. But there is a group of "conservatives" who seem to be inflexible, less insightful, and powerfully driven by a need for certainty and cognitive closure in their world. This group also seems to be overly concerned about a big brother-like takeover by government. It is the latter group that easily falls prey to the PR campaigns of corporate interests who push the idea that global warming is a massive unknown that is not certain, cannot be described in black/white terms, and may need government intervention. These ideas push the buttons of the underlying conservative psychology of this subgroup and makes them seek out the comfort of denial.

Again, I am not putting down conservatives who come to their leanings through rational means and are otherwise flexible and open in their beliefs. But there are many on the right who seem dependent on needs for predictability and certainty, and this group does not seem to want to consider the entire issue of climate change, nor the way that corporate interests are manipulating things. There is much more about this issue at two of my blogs: Conservative Psychology and The Climate Change Journal

(no subject)

Date: 18/1/12 15:40 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Hmm, could be.

(no subject)

Date: 18/1/12 17:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sealwhiskers.livejournal.com
Well, I think it is also this group which actively take part in small or big ways, to put corporate lobbying money into the whole equation and is actually "buying" parts of
government. The US is on good way to already becoming a corporatocracy, it is just not as widely discussed as it should.

(no subject)

Date: 20/1/12 00:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whak-hat.livejournal.com
Global warming is not the problem. It is a natural phenomenon. Pollution, especially plastic waste is a very real and very dangerous threat to the earth and ourselves. Deforestation is also a very real threat. War that is eroding our good land and polluting our waters, all very real. Landmines that are decades old, undetonated, very big problem. Children being kidnapped, raped and executed unfairly as war criminals is also a problem.

So let's tackle the actual problems of the world and leave this bullshit 'global warming' aside.

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031