The Game Changer?
6/1/12 16:17![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)

Well, it looks like Mitt Romney has been playing the "Selective Family Album" game and kinda/sorta/oppsies forgot to tell everyone he is 1/4 Mexican.
And just did why did Mitt's father flee Mexico for the safety of the US?
In his public life Mitt Romney has said and written little about his ancestors' history in Mexico. In one oft-repeated quote he said his family left the U.S. for Mexico to escape persecution for their religious beliefs.
In fact, Romney's great grandfather, Miles Park Romney, led that first expedition to escape not persecution but prosecution for polygamy, or what Mormons called ‘plural marriage.’
Well, this is rather awkward, from a race standpoint. So we have the Southern US. There is a strong showing of rather simple minded voters who are Crusading Voters for Christ and All Other Things White™.
Who they going to vote for. Mitt the Mex? Barrak the Magic Negro?
Or maybe that white guy Gary Johnson, the only real social liberal/fiscal conservative in the race.
God DAMN I love Southern Idiocracy.
Question: Game changer? If Mitt embraces his SOTB roots, will this swing brown skins to his camp? WILL ANYONE DEMAND TO SEE HIS BIRTH CERTIFICATE?
ETA: This just in! Cain demands to know more about this polygamy thing!
(no subject)
Date: 9/1/12 21:17 (UTC)But since you ask, I think that Chess was going for a point related to what you dismiss as a “false equivalency”. If Obama's background isn't “American enough” for some folks, will they have the same problem with Romney because of some parallels in their backgrounds? If Romney hews to GOP rhetoric about immigration being bad, does that same logic apply to his own family, which emigrated first to Mexico, then back to the US?
I wouldn't call that looking for a gotcha, exactly. Romney isn't responsible for justifying the actions of his ancestors, or even for commenting on them. But it points to how the poetics of immigration seem to be very different for White vs brown people, which lefties think has a troubling odor.
(no subject)
Date: 9/1/12 21:42 (UTC)Mainly because Romney was born in the United States via a family that would have stayed in the United States had he not been a victim. Compare that with Obama, who spent a significant portion of his childhood out of the country and appears to actively eschew the "American experience," as it were. But such claims are mostly thrown out by Birthers, who are nuts anyway, so...
If Romney hews to GOP rhetoric about immigration being bad, does that same logic apply to his own family, which emigrated first to Mexico, then back to the US?
This is where the implication comes in that somehow fleeing religious persecution isn't different than illegal immigration. That's what's a little bigoted and annoying.
But it points to how the poetics of immigration seem to be very different for White vs brown people, which lefties think has a troubling odor.
Ugh.
(no subject)
Date: 10/1/12 01:10 (UTC)Were almost half of all Republicans (http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20056061-503544.html) “nuts” in April of last year? Did they get better?
fleeing religious persecution isn't different than illegal immigration
I don't follow what you're getting at. If we had millions of Mexican immigrants coming to the US because they were fleeing religious persecution, Republicans would think it was awesome, but since they're doing it to escape poverty Republicans think it's important to build a thousand-mile-long wall with gun towers to keep them out?
(no subject)
Date: 10/1/12 03:26 (UTC)They weren't then because there was at least an excuse for still believing it prior to Obama finally releasing the damn thing officially as opposed to just online. Those still clinging to it now are absolutely certifiable.
I also highly doubt the number was half of Republicans, but I'm not looking to hash out the polling in detail right now.
If we had millions of Mexican immigrants coming to the US because they were fleeing religious persecution, Republicans would think it was awesome, but since they're doing it to escape poverty Republicans think it's important to build a thousand-mile-long wall with gun towers to keep them out?
I think your phrasing is kind of ridiculous, but basically.