[identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
From what I gather, it must be far more entertaining than all Comedy Central shows combined.

Rush Limbaugh Says His Remarks About Mars Were Taken Out Of Context, But His Own Transcript Betrays Him

So NASA has been the umpteenth scientific organization to get utterly corrupted by the global elitist liberal agenda, and is now lying about everything in order to push Obama's power-grabbing plan forward - or something. That's cute, you know. Today they lie about water or Mars, tomorrow they're gonna get us into an intergalactic war. FOR SHAME!

The leftist plot has no boundaries. It has now transcended the limits of this planet, and hopped across space to claim another world as well.

Read more... )
[identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com


Calling a woman a "slut" on national radio has turned out to have been a watershed in advertisers pulling support for not just Rush Limbaugh1, but conservative talk radio in general. Premiere Networks which carries Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Leykis, Glenn Beck, and Sean Hannity, has circulated a list of 98 sponsors that do not want their ads to run on the leading right wing talk shows. Some of the advertisers include: Ford, GM, Toyota, Allstate, GEICO, Prudential, State Farm, McDonald’s, and Subway. The combined audiences for these radio shows is substantial: nearly 46 million daily listeners. 2 The licensing fees for these national radio shows are very expensive, and without the support of advertising dollars, most local stations will be unable to continue broadcasts.

More behind here )
[identity profile] meus-ovatio.livejournal.com
Rush Limbaugh is always a good topic, and our new weekly topic is a good topic, so it is quite fortunate that we have this to talk about! How serendipititiousamentic!

Basically, Rush Limbaugh's crew reads something on Wikipedia, uses it, and gets burned. Evidently, the federal judge in question is more like the proverbial petunia-grower than a Palinesque bear-hunter. But hey, confirmation bias is a tricky and bastardy thing. (Holy crap, "bastardy" is actually a word!)

This article underscores a lot of old lessons, but it is good to review them:

1)Wikipedia is subject to misinformation and vandalism, most especially when it comes to current events and peoples.
2)Talk radio continues to be a trash outlet for trash.
3)Confirmation bias is sneaky and always present, even when you're on guard for it.
4)Rush Limbaugh remains a tool.

But will it matter? Of course not. We all know that corrections are about as useful as an eye-dropper in a four-alarm fire. I fully expect to hear this particular strain of misinformation in the coming weeks from various people, family and friends. And I will try and correct them, and they will just look at me weird, because they heard it on the radio, and things you hear on the radio are true.
[identity profile] kinvore.livejournal.com
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hUPJ61PNlJHEeOaxkxZjx85Db_8gD9BBMBKO0

This is priceless. Apparently Rush was assured his involvement in being a part owner of an NFL team was already approved. Imagine his surprise. In this article he manages to blame Obama for this fiasco. Oh, and apparently this is somehow a blow to the country. Karma, it's a bitch.

This man is so self-absorbed it's pathetic, and I can't believe he has such a huge audience. I guess if he's the de facto leader of the GOP that it explains why they're doing so badly lately.

It's good to see there's consequences for hate speech. He has a right to make racist remarks but I'm glad to see he's paying a price for them (even if it's a minor price). No really, it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy.
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Yes, yes, I know copy-paste shit, I understand, my personal opinion will follow:
Given the choice between the two.... )

All righty then: Rush Limbaugh v. Jonah Goldberg is somewhat better than Freddy v. Jason, but only mildly so. As Goldberg is the Right Wing version of an intellectual and Limbaugh's an arrogant arse clown....Jonah a-Go-Go!

I'll give Mr. Goldberg credit: he at least understands that the pirate rescue is something to celebrate in a Bipartisan manner. That fat drug-addicted Viagra-using bastard Limbaugh considers Bipartisanship to be "Everyone agrees with me on my bloviation."

Good on you, Jonah.

Rush? Don't rush yourself over that cliff, the rest of us need the laughter first....
[identity profile] torasama.livejournal.com
Rush Limbaugh challenges Obama to a Debate.

Quoth the Rush,
If you can win at this, then come here and beat me at my own game, and get rid of me once and for all, and show all the people of America that I am wrong.


I feel like nothing would come out of this at all. Rush would just be ranting at Obama the entire time, and be unwilling to listen/change his mind. It'd be incredibly unproductive and a waste of time.
[identity profile] verytwistedmind.livejournal.com
I know we're all tired of Rush Limbaugh posts but damnit this is fun!

http://www.democrats.org/page/s/submitslogan

Submit Your Slogan


We'll go through all of the slogans you submit, and the winner will have his or her submission appear on a billboard in Rush Limbaugh's hometown of West Palm Beach, Florida -- and receive a free T-shirt featuring the winning slogan.

Please keep your suggestion to ten words or fewer.

What are your slogans?

Mine
Rush, we will silence you and your country.

Bend over grab your ankles and prepare for stimulus.

ADDITIONAL POINTS EARNED if you post the creative e-mail address you used to submit your slogon.

mine: pinkocommietreehuger@DNC.com
[identity profile] jellomarx.livejournal.com
So Limbaugh has challenged the President to a duel.   Why should he bother?  He already won the fight.   Did FDR debate Limbaugh airwaves ancestor,  Father Coughlin?

 We complain about the hate radio as if it’s something that just recently came into being. In the 1930's there were the Antisemitic isolationist rants of Father Charles Coughlin. "At its peak in the early 1930s, Coughlin's radio show was phenomenally popular. His office received up to 80,000 letters per week from listeners, and his listening audience was estimated to rise at times to as much as a third of the nation. Coughlin is often credited as one of the major demagogues of the 20th century for being able to influence politics through broadcasting, without actually holding a political office himself." Wikipedia


 Does this sound familiar? Today’s version of Father Coughlin is Rush Limbaugh. “Coughlin, who was attracted to the Jewish conspiracy theories promulgated by Henry Ford's 1932 anti-Semitic tome, The International Jew, became increasingly extremist in his tone and delivery, accusing FDR of being a tool of the evil cabal that secretly ran the world. He was a significant spokesman for the "America First" movement, which advocated American non-involvement in the growing strife in Europe and Asia. And he was an inspiration for a whole generation of anti-Semites who went on to found such movements as Christian Identity and Posse Comitatus.

Limbaugh, in contrast, has always carefully eschewed conspiracy theories and anti-Semitism. Through most of the first decade of his radio career, his primary schtick has been to rail against the government and its supposed takeover of our daily lives. This anti-government propaganda has served one main purpose: To drive a wedge between middle- and lower-class workers and the one entity that has the real (if sometimes abused or neglected) capability to protect them from the ravages of wealthy class warriors and swarms of corporate wolves.”
  http://cursor.org/stories/fascismi.php

I've often thought that the fans of the like of Limbaugh should be like Hockey Fans. Any given city may have 17,000 of them, but they go to every game. Nobody else listens, nobody else watches. For Limbaugh his huge audience is loyal, dedicated and maniacal. But it's still a minority. I think that we have to remember this. The majority has seen through his charade. As disgusting a thought as this may be, the emperor has no clothes.
[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Article behind cut )

________________________________________

I think this is a good idea. On the other, it gives Limbaugh far more power and authority than he would have had otherwise and it also makes the Democrats seem weak. If they have to target a single individual who is not even amongst the GOP Congresscritters as the standard-bearer of the party, and not an actual politician of the Republican Party....but I forget that Barack Obama won his election against Sarah Palin and not the actual front-runner of the race, so that requires more sense than the incompetent gang of fools in the Democratic Party are ever going to be able to muster. >.>

[identity profile] verytwistedmind.livejournal.com
Saul Alinsky, a community organizer, who wrote the ground breaking book Rules for Radicals. There are 13 rules but I want to focus on #13

http://www.infed.org/thinkers/alinsky.htm

13) Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it (Alinsky 1972: 130). This is perhaps Saul Alinsky’s most controversial rule and is the counter to the common idea that we should not make things personal. When pursuing the changes in the inheritance law for paintings he targets one individual. He will often find out who the CEO is in a company and hound that person. In the organophosphates debate it is one scientist that he targets and the validity of his findings.


In the last two months I've noticed this rule being applied to two specific groups; CEO's/Private Jets and Rush Limbaugh.

There have been several post out this group attacking Rush Limbaugh as well. I find it interesting that so many people are following the direction of this administration in attacking a private citizine.

I suppose this should be expected since we are now under the rule of a community organizer.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/19596.html



Would you single out a private citizen or instead focus on elected political officals?

Did the last administration ever attack the liberal talking heads like Rosie O'Donnell John Stewart or
Kanye West?

[identity profile] smokystein.livejournal.com


Have you questioned the great Leader of the Republican Party Rush Limbaugh lately? Do you repent? 

[identity profile] paft.livejournal.com
Maybe you can explain this to me:

"To us, bipartisanship is them being forced to agree with us after we politically have cleaned their clocks and beaten them. And that has to be what we're focused on." Rush Limbaugh

How do you "force" someone to agree with you?

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031