It is easy to ignore and step over one homeless person on the sidewalk as it is to ignore hundreds (thousands) of protesters camped out at your place of employment. It's a nuisance, perhaps even a hazard. It ties up police, bylaw and security resources. But it is as easy to ignore as it is easy to ignore the consequences of chemicals dumped into the river to save proper disposal/storage costs. Blinders are wonderful things.
But how does the Occupy Movement capture attention? Sure they have the attention of the media, and much of the public. But this attention only translates into supporter and detractors. What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!) is some action taken to make things right. They need the attention of policy makers in business and government to make things right.
As a community, occupy can distill which demands are best, most appropriate and doable. And perhaps this requires input not just from within the Occupy movement, but broadly, Dialogue must occur between Occupy and those they seek to engage, like Wall Street, the bankers, the Government, etc. It's not even a stalemate when the engagement is lip service.
"The protests, for all this incoherence, restore Wall Street to a central place in the economic narrative. Here is the financial industry, not just as recipient of taxpayer funds but as originator and aggravator of the crisis. The protests may not have an agenda, but they do not need an agenda other than to return political focus onto Wall Street." -Jonathan Chait, New York magazine
So how to gain the attention of those that Occupy wants to engage? Well, if they are willing to step over the people sleeping in the streets, block the calls of workers they've laid off, you got to hit them where it hurts... in the bank balance.
Bank Transfer Day has the potential to wake up more then a few sleepy Wall Streeters with blinders on. The idea is to withdraw all money from the big national banks and put it into small local/community credit unions (hopefully not ones owned by the big banks) by November 5th. Then the smart thing to do is to avoid any/all fees the banks could be making a profit with. Transfer your mortgage. Stop using debit. Etc.
Furthermore, cash in on all investments. The point is to hurt the banks and Wall Street as much as possible, limiting their earnings, and thereby forcing them to finally engage the 99%.
And finally, do all your shopping at small independent merchants.
The downside is that if Walmart (NYSE: WMT) looses significant investment, and customer base, it might be pushed to initiate layoffs. Hurting the largest single employer in the world, would hurt employees. Hurting Wall Street could hurt everyone. But that's the gamble.
Business is said to have to answer to investors. And the customer is always right. Not being either means a relinquishment of all power. But we are potential customers and their profits are entirely dependent on us.
The 1200 protests with average of 1000 participants each is only 1.2million customers. Most are living are month to month, paycheque to paycheque. Many can't afford to not shop at big box stores, the parking fees downtown would kill us. We do not represent enough profit for big business to worry about. Not unless this thing catches on.

But how does the Occupy Movement capture attention? Sure they have the attention of the media, and much of the public. But this attention only translates into supporter and detractors. What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!) is some action taken to make things right. They need the attention of policy makers in business and government to make things right.
As a community, occupy can distill which demands are best, most appropriate and doable. And perhaps this requires input not just from within the Occupy movement, but broadly, Dialogue must occur between Occupy and those they seek to engage, like Wall Street, the bankers, the Government, etc. It's not even a stalemate when the engagement is lip service.
"The protests, for all this incoherence, restore Wall Street to a central place in the economic narrative. Here is the financial industry, not just as recipient of taxpayer funds but as originator and aggravator of the crisis. The protests may not have an agenda, but they do not need an agenda other than to return political focus onto Wall Street." -Jonathan Chait, New York magazine
So how to gain the attention of those that Occupy wants to engage? Well, if they are willing to step over the people sleeping in the streets, block the calls of workers they've laid off, you got to hit them where it hurts... in the bank balance.
Bank Transfer Day has the potential to wake up more then a few sleepy Wall Streeters with blinders on. The idea is to withdraw all money from the big national banks and put it into small local/community credit unions (hopefully not ones owned by the big banks) by November 5th. Then the smart thing to do is to avoid any/all fees the banks could be making a profit with. Transfer your mortgage. Stop using debit. Etc.
Furthermore, cash in on all investments. The point is to hurt the banks and Wall Street as much as possible, limiting their earnings, and thereby forcing them to finally engage the 99%.
And finally, do all your shopping at small independent merchants.
The downside is that if Walmart (NYSE: WMT) looses significant investment, and customer base, it might be pushed to initiate layoffs. Hurting the largest single employer in the world, would hurt employees. Hurting Wall Street could hurt everyone. But that's the gamble.
Business is said to have to answer to investors. And the customer is always right. Not being either means a relinquishment of all power. But we are potential customers and their profits are entirely dependent on us.
The 1200 protests with average of 1000 participants each is only 1.2million customers. Most are living are month to month, paycheque to paycheque. Many can't afford to not shop at big box stores, the parking fees downtown would kill us. We do not represent enough profit for big business to worry about. Not unless this thing catches on.

(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:03 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:33 (UTC)Don't get sidetracked by (historical) fact, when the fiction is more relevant.
(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:35 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:47 (UTC)Many Occupy participants are proud that the organization has been leaderless and anarchy in action. It is by far not the most disciplined of organizations, precisely because it is anarchy by nature. But what Occupy lacks in discipline and organization, it has already proved itself to have will and bollocks.
What will prove itself worthy of a footnote in history is it's stay-power. Do they have the traction to survive the cold winter? And more importantly, do they have the power to achieve any of it's many goals? (any one achievement would be awesome)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 05:08 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:17 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:23 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 21:42 (UTC)OWS has alienated so many people it may get many Dems unelected.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:(frozen) Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:Re: Fact check time
From:In ur timecube, pooping in ur past
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:27 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:54 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:34 (UTC)This sort of attitude falls really flat when you start showing pictures of women and children. Which is why they had to invent the "welfare queen". "Queen" because no one can feel sorry for a "queen" (queens are powerful and therefore bad).
(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 20:49 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 18/10/11 22:36 (UTC)Think of it as a really big trust fall
Date: 18/10/11 23:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 08:00 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 11:52 (UTC)But I feel it's all but inevitable before it gets co-oped by its fringe elements. I like some of their demands on the website, but when I see stuff like end the Fed, return to the gold standard, etc it really makes me wonder if their all-inclusive attitude is gonna be their downfall.
(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 19:18 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 19:20 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19/10/11 23:31 (UTC)And we want to hurt the banks revenue stream so they will change the way they conduct business. Predatory lending practices is why the 2008 crash happened and that practice hasn't stopped. It's just being conducted by even larger banks now.
The goal is to prevent the next crash from happening. Right now it seems inevitable. Being ignorant of the situation isn't helping. Waiting for government to stop it isn't working. We have to appeal to those who are practicing financial terrorism.
easy to ignore hundreds (thousands) of protesters
Date: 19/10/11 23:23 (UTC)**The attendance of the rally was disputed; a scientific estimate placed the crowd size around 87,000, while media reports varied dramatically from tens of thousands to 500,000.**
This year restoring courage
http://www.glennbeck.com/publish/uploads/2011/08/1108024_07_03_190-640x426.jpg
SURE - IT IS VERY EASY TO IGNORE!
Re: easy to ignore hundreds (thousands) of protesters
Date: 20/10/11 15:00 (UTC)What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!)
Date: 19/10/11 23:37 (UTC)1. Eat the reach
2. No Jewish in the banks/courts/USA
3. Make more regulations and Tax the reach
4. Pay them more money for doing nothing, or doing job others will do with half price.
How they do it?
Creating hazards in streets and parks, fighting with police and defecating on police cars.
Sounds like solid movement and solid plan.
Sure we should hear them and think about them!
Re: What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!)
Date: 20/10/11 07:37 (UTC)That doesn't even make any sense.
Re: What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!)
From:Re: What Occupy wants (DEMANDS!)
From:What the fuck?
Date: 20/10/11 15:00 (UTC)