Tea Party Priorities
11/10/11 07:56As she bowed out of the running for the office of the President of the US, Sarah Palin outlined her personal priority scheme. Sympathetic responses caused me to realize that something about her priorities resonates with other Tea Partiers. Her priority scheme fits a general priority paradigm with which a number of voters can relate. It resonates with their personal sentiments about their own lives.
Starting with the Sarah Palin priority pyramid, our students derived a general Tea Party Priority Pyramid that reflects the resonance with Palin's position. The illustration depicts these priorities starting with the lowest one of country at the bottom in red. Despite the racial diversity of Tea Party constituents, the middle priority of family retains the heavenly color of the clouds. At the primary position on the apex of the pyramid, our students capped the paradigm with a cerulean deity sub-pyramid. (The use of TM in the illustration represents "Tea-party Mark" and the My prefix reflects a My Space mindset within the Tea Party despite their graduation to Facebook.)

Starting with the bloody standard at the base of the pyramid, we asked the question of what exactly does a Tea Partier think of when they speak of their country? Is it the same country as their fellow citizens, or is it a narrowly conceived country? Does it primarily mean the collective citizenry of their territory, or do they conceive of a territory occupied by an alien population? Do they consider their country to be the government that operates within that territory, or do they view that government as an alien entity? When a Tea Partier considers their personal country, do they dismiss the people and the governing institutions altogether and think only of the Constitution? Is the Constitution they value the actual Constitution, or is a Constitution of the Partier's imagination?
These are important distinctions to consider whenever you hear someone speaking of their country. The same sort of process can be applied to their personal deity. Not only can we find distinctions between the Tea Partier's personal deity and those of non-Christian traditions, we can also find differences with other Christian deities. I am sure there are distinctions between different personal deities within the ranks of the Partiers themselves.
The implications of the priority pyramid are manifold. The greatest one is the subordination of the interests of the country to the interests of the self and its family. A Tea Partier will serve self and deity above all and expect the rest of their personal country to serve their personal family interests. The second greatest implication is the subordination of the rest of the planet below the interests of the personal country. Not only does the Tea Partier want their own country to bend to their will, they want all other countries to do so as well. We can imagine a subterranean extension of the pyramid that includes the rest of the world.
I place the biosphere above humanity, humanity above my country, and my country above myself and my family. Naturally, I relegate Sarah Palin's deity to a lower domain.
What are your priorities?
Starting with the Sarah Palin priority pyramid, our students derived a general Tea Party Priority Pyramid that reflects the resonance with Palin's position. The illustration depicts these priorities starting with the lowest one of country at the bottom in red. Despite the racial diversity of Tea Party constituents, the middle priority of family retains the heavenly color of the clouds. At the primary position on the apex of the pyramid, our students capped the paradigm with a cerulean deity sub-pyramid. (The use of TM in the illustration represents "Tea-party Mark" and the My prefix reflects a My Space mindset within the Tea Party despite their graduation to Facebook.)

Starting with the bloody standard at the base of the pyramid, we asked the question of what exactly does a Tea Partier think of when they speak of their country? Is it the same country as their fellow citizens, or is it a narrowly conceived country? Does it primarily mean the collective citizenry of their territory, or do they conceive of a territory occupied by an alien population? Do they consider their country to be the government that operates within that territory, or do they view that government as an alien entity? When a Tea Partier considers their personal country, do they dismiss the people and the governing institutions altogether and think only of the Constitution? Is the Constitution they value the actual Constitution, or is a Constitution of the Partier's imagination?
These are important distinctions to consider whenever you hear someone speaking of their country. The same sort of process can be applied to their personal deity. Not only can we find distinctions between the Tea Partier's personal deity and those of non-Christian traditions, we can also find differences with other Christian deities. I am sure there are distinctions between different personal deities within the ranks of the Partiers themselves.
The implications of the priority pyramid are manifold. The greatest one is the subordination of the interests of the country to the interests of the self and its family. A Tea Partier will serve self and deity above all and expect the rest of their personal country to serve their personal family interests. The second greatest implication is the subordination of the rest of the planet below the interests of the personal country. Not only does the Tea Partier want their own country to bend to their will, they want all other countries to do so as well. We can imagine a subterranean extension of the pyramid that includes the rest of the world.
I place the biosphere above humanity, humanity above my country, and my country above myself and my family. Naturally, I relegate Sarah Palin's deity to a lower domain.
What are your priorities?
(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 15:30 (UTC)I agree.
Date: 11/10/11 15:38 (UTC)Re: I agree.
From:Re: I agree.
From:Re: I agree.
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/10/11 10:47 (UTC)If so, that's freakin' crazy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:His God...
From:By being...
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 15:48 (UTC)At one point...
Date: 11/10/11 15:55 (UTC)Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:Re: At one point...
From:(no subject)
From:The chill...
From:Re: At one point...
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 17:31 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 20:11 (UTC)(no subject)
From:Nationalism...
Date: 11/10/11 16:06 (UTC)Viva the simple life!
(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 16:15 (UTC)If I put my dog above 6.5 billion people, does that make me selfish, or a realist, or normal, or an asshole (or all of the above)?
(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 16:29 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:It is the pet...
From:Re: It is the pet...
From:Re: It is the pet...
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:I love my pet more...
Date: 11/10/11 16:35 (UTC)Did Somebody Say Misanthrope?
From:Re: Did Somebody Say Misanthrope?
From:Re: Did Somebody Say Misanthrope?
From:Re: Did Somebody Say Misanthrope?
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 23:24 (UTC)Why not? Your dog will treat you with an unyielding selfless loyalty and respect. The 6.5 billion you mention? Pffft. To most of them you're a source of potential revenue and nothing more.
(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 17:27 (UTC)Humanity?
Date: 11/10/11 18:19 (UTC)Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Obviously
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:Re: Humanity?
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 17:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 17:32 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 19:53 (UTC)I mean, I love the biosphere. It's where I live. So I certainly wouldn't buy a Hummer. But neither am I going to waste portions of my lifetime using public transportation all the time.
I don't go big game hunting or light firecrackers in frogs, but neither do I wear a mask to avoid inhaling gnats.
Priorities interact and a balance is struck; they are not hierarchical.
I, too, avoid public transportation.
Date: 11/10/11 21:51 (UTC)Priorities give us an idea of how decisions are made. When a person places their country above other countries, there is a greater likelihood that they will abuse other countries in their foreign policy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 20:30 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 21:26 (UTC)You could...
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 21:27 (UTC)1) My wife and daughter.
2) Myself.
3) My close personal friends.
And the rest of the world be damned for all I care.
Where would you be without them?
Date: 11/10/11 21:53 (UTC)Re: Where would you be without them?
From:IAWTC
From:Re: IAWTC
From:Re: Where would you be without them?
From:Re: Where would you be without them?
From:(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 22:03 (UTC)If you believed in theocracy...
Date: 12/10/11 15:21 (UTC)I simply hope that you keep your political priorities within the domain of reason.
(no subject)
Date: 11/10/11 22:53 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 12/10/11 01:51 (UTC)1. Truth
2. Honour
3. Justice
4. Love
The Tea Party priorities aren't bad either. They probably reflect the thinking of a lot of people.
(no subject)
Date: 12/10/11 05:05 (UTC)1. Me. I gotta eat. I gotta survive.
2. Mine. My family. My girlfriend.
3. My people. My friends come before strangers. People I identify with come before those I cannot relate to.
(no subject)
Date: 12/10/11 10:06 (UTC)A pyramid without a foundation...
Date: 12/10/11 10:58 (UTC)The metaphor...
From:(no subject)
Date: 12/10/11 14:44 (UTC)There is a difference...
Date: 12/10/11 15:29 (UTC)The perception of the Left is inaccurate. The Left does not base society on government but seeks to base government on society rather than on material power.
Re: There is a difference...
From:Re: There is a difference...
From:Re: There is a difference...
From: