[identity profile] badlydrawnjeff.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
...Sarah Palin is not running for President:

My decision is based upon a review of what common sense Conservatives and Independents have accomplished, especially over the last year. I believe that at this time I can be more effective in a decisive role to help elect other true public servants to office – from the nation’s governors to Congressional seats and the Presidency. We need to continue to actively and aggressively help those who will stop the “fundamental transformation” of our nation and instead seek the restoration of our greatness, our goodness and our constitutional republic based on the rule of law.


This shouldn't be a surprise to anyone - she's been telegraphing this for well over a year. While I was absolutely on the Palin bus until she resigned from the Alaska governorship, her negatives have risen so high that there was no chance she could actually come out of the primary victorious anyway.

Who do you think she endorses? How does this impact the race now that the folks who were holding out on her word need to line up behind someone?

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 12:21 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com
I don't know why anyone cares. She is both a loser and a quitter. If anything they should be fearful of her endorsement.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 12:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-new-machine.livejournal.com
Seriously. At this point, Palin is just the next step in the politics-as-circus evolution. She's Rush Limbaugh, only people like looking at her, so she can go on TV. Also, everyone once in a while Limbaugh makes a good point on his own, whereas Palin has to be force-fed lines to avoid rampant historical and factual inaccuracies that sink any hopes of credibility.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 07:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Maybe because he's popular on The Internetz?

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
Koch bros of course.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] udoswald.livejournal.com
I guess she really hasn't opened her mouth about her preferred candidate but I don't see people hanging on her words in that regard either. It seems her time has passed. She is so 3 years ago. Heck, the teapartiers are already through her replacement (Bachmann) and on to the next (Cain). At this point, as far as kingmakers go, people seem to care far more about what Trump thinks than who Palin supports. She may be able to sway a few thousand votes but I don't think her power is what it was a few years ago.

Jayzeus!

Date: 6/10/11 15:47 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
Everyone knows that Republican candidates are anointed by the material Creator of the flat and immobile Earth.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 18:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eracerhead.livejournal.com
She's not a kingmaker. She will attract a few but she isn't going to get tea partiers to vote for Romney or moderates to vote for Ron Paul.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 07:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
And then people say the conservative "side" is much more homogeneous than the liberal one.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 10:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
Palpatine.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:12 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 13:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
My guess is she keeps her finger in the air until it is obvious who will end up on the ticket. If she had any balls, she'd endorse Huntsman.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:39 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
Huntsman is an awfully sensible pick for the lady who graced both Angle and O'Donnell.

I'm betting she endorses Cain.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 07:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
She could get a free 4-year subscription for pizza delivery.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com
She has pretty much been positioning herself to make money from the circuit.

Quitting the governorship
Starting up a TV show in Alaska
Being a pundit on Fox
Doing book tours
Having her daughter being on Dancing with the Stars

Her endorsement would actually harm a candidate.

Of course, considering the rotating line of Tea Party "favorites" -- it doesnt change the race since the race has already been changing on its own moving from Romney...to Cain...to Bachmann...to Perry... back to Romney...

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 14:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com
She supports money.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 15:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] udoswald.livejournal.com
I firmly believe the whole "will she, won't she" thing was a ruse to keep her in the public eye. She never had any intention of running. Chris Christie did the same thing.

Both Christie and Palin are extremely egotistical people who crave attention and praise. They figured that by pretending to run they could get these things. Neither of them wants the negatives that come from actually running though (actual media scrutiny, having to lay out real policy positions, etc...) and Palin's not going to give up her millions of dollars in appearance fees for the slim chance of getting a job that pays a few hundred thousand dollars a year.

I don't think Palin will ever run, her chance came and went. Christie however will wait until 2016. He's not going to waste his chance on trying to unseat an incumbent when he can wait 4 years and run in an open election.

What I find fascinating...

Date: 6/10/11 15:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
In her announcement, she places her own family above the level of the country. This shows an innately corrupt attitude that people like her have that they will participate in public service only to the extent that it supports their own personal interests and those of their family.

As for "telegraphing" not running, just the other day she implied that she was keeping her hat out of the Republican circus in order to maintain a maverick position. It had all of the earmarks of an independent run for office. Also, her bus tour telegraphed political hucksterism associated with a run for office.

Whoever she supports will bear the mark of Cain.

Re: What I find fascinating...

Date: 6/10/11 16:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com
As a one who has fledged the nest, I place community above family. Family is only one very small part of the larger society.

Re: What I find fascinating...

Date: 7/10/11 07:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Realistically, we all place family above country. But her saying the truth is not very politically correct. ;-)

On the other hand, it wins her a few more Maverick points.

Maybe she should change that US-flag pin with a pic of her daughter or something.

Re: What I find fascinating...

Date: 7/10/11 06:11 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com
The minute she quit as governor, in her 1st term -- she deep-sixed any chance
of running for President.

Any talk was talk to keep interest going and money coming in, but she
was never a serious contender and she knows it...

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 16:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueduck37.livejournal.com
Is our bet still on about Rick Perry winning the GOP nomination?

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 08:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
One more similarity with Bush Jr. And he won. Twice.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 10:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
I think it'll be Romney. The immigration thing will sink Perry when it comes time for hardball.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 17:50 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
She's not endorsing anybody. She's a maverick!

But seriously. Maybe Bachmann.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 18:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] existentme.livejournal.com
Hopefully, no one - and not because it might help or harm someone, but rather as an indictment of every single candidate (save, perhaps, Paul) currently in the game.

In spite of her apparent shortcomings in what passes as important must-have-knowledge to be President, and is not, say, a Constitutional law scholar or a professor of history, she does have a keen enough understanding of exactly what is going on (http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/10/us/10iht-currents10.html?_r=2&emc=eta1) in the world of U.S. politics, government and business, and calls it out at that piece for exactly what it is, bullshit.

For this reason, I'd hate to see her embrace any of the current candidates, and if she were not what I call crazy-religious, and perhaps a little more environment-friendly, I might be inclined to think a vote in November of '12 might actually mean something.

That's not the case, however, so for now I'll be more than pleased if she just disses the whole gang of them, thereby standing firmly behind what she's quoted at the article as having said, rather than just becoming another one of them for whatever purpose at all.

(no subject)

Date: 6/10/11 20:36 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devil-ad-vocate.livejournal.com
Who do I think she endorses?

Sarah Palin.

She's the best grifter I've seen since "The Sting".

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 01:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I'll give her props for not running. I don't think this changes anything except to possibly help Bachmann.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 06:14 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com
Bachmann's not a serious contender at this point,
and hasnt been the moment Perry threw his hat in the ring...

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 08:01 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
So it'll be a white male again on the GOP side. How boring.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 10:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dv8nation.livejournal.com
Hey, one of those has won every election but one. They do have a track record.

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 13:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chessdev.livejournal.com
I would be seriously surprised if it wasnt

(no subject)

Date: 7/10/11 22:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ddstory.livejournal.com
Not only is she not running for president, it now seems (http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-october-6-2011/indecision-2012---take-the-money-and-don-t-run) she had never planned to run, but she lured her supporters in donating money to her PAC and then used it for her bus tour, among other things. How cynical can she be?

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods

DAILY QUOTE:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

March 2026

M T W T F S S
       1
2345 678
910 1112 1314 15
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526 272829
3031