(no subject)

Date: 10/9/11 18:30 (UTC)
Everything I read in the linked article supports my claim.

Actually, the article outright rebuts it:

"But a review of state records, internal e-mails of DBT employees and testimony before the civil rights commission and an elections task force showed no evidence that minorities were specifically targeted.

...

Records show that DBT told the state it would not use race as a criterion to identify felons. The list itself bears that out: More than 1,000 voters were matched with felons though they were of different races."

AND

"The list identified thousands of legal voters as criminals, forcing them to prove their innocence before they could cast a ballot."

So no. The article clearly, concisely, exactly says the opposite of your claim.

What the linked article didn't mention, but what is mentioned in the movie Unprecedented, are the connections between the State government (under Jeb Bush at the time) and ChoicePoint and the specifics on how the purge rolls were generated.

You run with a conspiracy theory film, I go with the Palm Beach Post. Okay then.

As long as the voters purged vote to the left of the spectrum, it seems, you have no problem. With that observation, I'm done with this useless thread.

Odd assertion to make.

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
2324 2526272829
30