(no subject)

Date: 5/9/11 18:17 (UTC)
What about that phrasing proves different from what I said? If extractable resources are less than demand, demand cannot grow, and with it the economy. You are repeating what I say.

You see it as production. When production is artificially limited, that doesn't create a peak situation.

As to being "clearly" no where near that, I would posit that the level of extraction is, simply, the level of extraction. If it cannot increase, peak has arrived. It has not increased since 2005 (except briefly during the super spike of 2008, but that level quickly decreased both as limited wells ran dry and the lowered price made further expensive extraction unfeasible).

It can increase, but the political will doesn't exist, or it's more profitable to continue allowing the cartel to work its will. That doesn't mean the level of extraction cannot increase, just that it has not increased.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30