(no subject)

Date: 24/7/11 19:02 (UTC)
This is a tough issue for me.

I think any measure interfering with a person's right to have children is a severe infringement on their rights. On the other hand, I can see where our growing population can (and, I believe, already has in some places) lead to disaster. The ideal world population would be less than what it is right now.

Perhaps a good approach would be to give people an incentive to have fewer children. Maybe a financial reward for sticking to two? But that requires putting more money through the government, and we're already way in over our heads there. So that might not be the best, after all.

In the end, I think it comes down to education - such a fundamentally important part of the approach to solving almost any problem, it seems. Educated people are more likely to have smaller families for a number of reasons - they understand how to use birth control, they can provide for their families without needing children to help with agricultural work, they understand the population issue, and of course, they tend to put off starting a family until they've finished their education.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30