So you've found a nice chink in the armor, but it's one we're well aware of and which is debated internally. Nor does such chink actually make anything else logically follow.
Bruce, I like you but you have to realise... It does logically follow. As much as there's a phenomenologically identifiable self, that self does co-exist in proximity with others and sometimes an action which appears to be entirely self-regarding is actually other-regarding as well.
You don't have to give up your principles of supporting individual liberty to acknowledge this.
Credits & Style Info
Talk Politics. A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 20/7/11 06:30 (UTC)Bruce, I like you but you have to realise... It does logically follow. As much as there's a phenomenologically identifiable self, that self does co-exist in proximity with others and sometimes an action which appears to be entirely self-regarding is actually other-regarding as well.
You don't have to give up your principles of supporting individual liberty to acknowledge this.