(no subject)

Date: 19/7/11 22:35 (UTC)
We all have our opinions on proper choices. I believe that eating something that can kill you is a poor choice unless you're suicidal. Mostly everyone who did these things were not suicidal (I'm hoping I can get away with that assumption), so it seems like a poor choice to me.

If I don't stop them, many negative externalities arise which is bad for a society. The cycle of poverty won't stop itself, and making life expectancy so low that people leave orphans/widows or infant mortality so high that they're forced to have multiple kids just so a few of them may survive is not healthy for a society. A few years of food regulation and you see drastic improvements in health across the board, that to me is worth the small opportunity cost.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30