(no subject)

Date: 14/7/11 02:34 (UTC)
every single liberal friend I have, and a few non-liberal friends, is perfectly accepting of polygamy. Legalizing it would be fine for all of them. Most of my married friends are in fact in various forms of polyamory and it works fine for them.

The only issue i have is that child support and inheritance and succession laws would need to be altered to adequately address the possibilities.

What no one has mentioned is that the "ideal" of solo-partner unions has to do with ensuring adequate supply of females for all males, rather than heightened competition. Our birthrate ratio tends to be 50/50 thus if one man is allowed to "hoard" the women, then other males will go without. Monogamy evolved to force men to cooperate more and additionally recognize paternity more readily.

Both forms of polygamy mean that males will be more likely to compete for females either on a nuclear family level or on a society-wide level. Polygyny means many men will "lose out" on being paired, Polyandry means men will have their genetic chance of reproduction diluted and risk supporting a cuckoo's egg. Monogamy makes sense for men. Polygamy makes sense for women, regardless of which version they practice.

Me personally, I would love to join a line marriage. Too bad its illegal. As it is, I'll stick with monogamy.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30