The following news article elaborately portrays everything wrong with politics, economics and human civilization in this day and age.
Read carefully humble reader and see if you can spot it.
NY court says strip club's lap dances are taxable
ALBANY, N.Y. – Getting a lap dance isn't the same as taking in a ballet, so an alcohol-free strip club will have to pay the tax man, a New York state court has ruled.
Four Appellate Division justices agreed with a state tax appeals commission's earlier finding that dances onstage or in private rooms at the club Nite Moves in suburban Albany don't qualify for a state tax exemption as "dramatic or musical arts performances."
Still, the club tried to bolster its artistic argument with testimony from a cultural anthropologist who has studied exotic dance and visited Nite Moves, and who said the lap dances should be considered choreographed performances.
http://old.news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110611/ap_on_fe_st/us_lap_dance_taxes_2
...
The reel and trufax problem of the entire world...
Everyone. Literally: everyone, has an "expert" stashed away in their left pocket enthusiastically willing to whore out their academic and educational credibility for dollars and cents.
Even a strip club can hire a cultural anthropologist and "leading expert" in their respective field to spin a web of half-truths and politicized scientific propaganda intended to circumvent paying taxes.
How does one believe a word a purported "expert" or "academic" in their field cares to offer when they are demonstrably willing to sell out their academic integrity and ethics to the highest bidder on an open market?
Indeed, finding economists and bankers willing to justify Bush's or Obama's economic policies is merely a matter of paying them. Finding educational experts or other "accredited professionals" willing to support an educational policy or initiative is merely a matter of money. Likewise with "expert opinion" on healthcare, taxes, defense and every other issue in the world.
The experts we rely on to provide us with clear and unbiased commentary on important issues are thus revealed to have a conflict of interests between what they would say as unbiased and objective parties and the difference of opinion associated with being paid to substantiate special interests politicized agendas.
The chain of information and media people rely on are only as strong as their weakest link. In an era where a strip club can hire an athropologist to falsify a political campaign we should take heed and be aware not only of failings inherent in religion or older historical sources, but newer failures inherent in science and our own educational standards as well.
We probably won't being that people are hard wired to blindly believe everything and anything an official institution tells us. Whether it be religion, science, politics its generally much easier to believe blindly in the mechanics of the process trusting in others to do the dirty work associated with mincing details for us.
Therein lies our main potential for failure and the carrot and pole with which public opinion can be manipulated and exploited towards serving pre-existing agenda.
Blah, blah. /Boring, old and obvious stuff everyone knew millennia ago.
I wasn't going to say anything here for awhile, but Underlankers made me feel like posting again. Thanks for that, buddy.
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 02:48 (UTC)That lap dances aren't choreographed? As a blanket statement I find that a dubious proposition.
Although whether or not they are choreographed I find difficult to relate to whether they should or should not be taxed.
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 02:58 (UTC)2. "The reel and trufax problem of the entire world...
Everyone. Literally: everyone, has an "expert" stashed away in their left pocket enthusiastically willing to whore out their academic and educational credibility for dollars and cents."
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:21 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:02 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:19 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 02:58 (UTC)We all know that there is no higher form of evidence than the crap you make up.
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 02:59 (UTC)2. There's nothing reasonable about blindly believing anything and everything a person with a title says. Whether said title be it pope, bishop, doctor or expert -- blindly believing everything and anything they say without evidence is foolish.
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:05 (UTC)2. I agree, that's why we go to school and learn how to participate in academic discussions, so we can tell which experts are BS and which aren't; this is your problem, you have no method of separating wheat from chaff other than what appears to be intuition. Trust me, a university degree (any) will far better equip you to make sense of the world than spending time lurking around conspiracy websites.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:No?
From:Re: No?
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 12:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:01 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:06 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 03:53 (UTC)I have no idea what the rest of his post is talking about. More rage against academia. The paranoia about experts is very peculiar, did someone molest you with a rolled up diploma or something?
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 04:16 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 06:04 (UTC)I'd say that almost all tax exemptions should be done away with. I'd be willing to go with all if that makes it easier to implement.
(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 06:29 (UTC)If the guys are built, yes!!!!!!!!!!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 07:35 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 12:51 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 18:37 (UTC)Also, if you fail to realize the difference between goods and services it shouldn't be a big surprise that you don't understand what I'm talking about.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 10:26 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 13:35 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 18:36 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 11:29 (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30/6/11 18:42 (UTC)So would Jesus, Buddha and Mohammad.
Because of course, there's only 1 possible closed minded view on everything in the world and anyone who disagrees should be punched in the face, right?
(no subject)
From: