[identity profile] sophia-sadek.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
There is a huge abyss dividing Celtic culture from that of Rome. The divide is as broad and profound as the way the symbols of the harp and bard differ from those of the fasces and dome. When we consider the case of Maggie Gallagher, Chair of the National Organization for Marriage, we see the sorry state of a daughter of Gael cut off from her native culture by the sharp axe of Rome. Her mission is to preserve the moldy language of rabid bigotry in order to protect a heritage that does not suit her land of origin.




Ms. Gallagher would have us turn our backs on the smallest portion of society simply for the sake of lingual despotism. She is probably the kind of person who turns her nose up at the idea that hypocrites pray in public as she shambles off to her local temple for a quick fix of the body and blood of Constantine.

Is marriage only something that can be practiced by a woman and a man? This woman seems to be wedded to an idea. How is that possible when the material Creator has told her that she can only marry a man? Has she failed to practice what she preaches? Senator Mark Grisanti has managed to divorce himself from that same idea. Perhaps she too will someday see the light and drag her ill conceived notion into the court of public opinion for a sound thrashing.


What other forms of marriage do we see being practiced besides that between a woman and a man?

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 16:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soliloquy76.livejournal.com
Ah, the referendum. Because the people always know what's best.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 21:27 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog-expat.livejournal.com
I don't get why she was insisting the bill be killed in favor of a referendum since all she has to do if it passes is start a referendum to re-instate the one man, one woman definition.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 16:25 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
lol god. "CHEAP DATE! Just a bucket of wheat, and we're done!"

Re: That reminds me...

Date: 30/6/11 00:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] existentme.livejournal.com
Okay, google did not help me, so if everyone else here actually knows what "the melon method" is, will someone please go ahead and update me on this?

Re: That reminds me...

Date: 30/6/11 00:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
*waits in the corner with existentme*

Re: That reminds me...

Date: 30/6/11 01:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] existentme.livejournal.com
Yes, because of course I need this information for my libertarian communities, see?

Re: That reminds me...

Date: 30/6/11 17:20 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] existentme.livejournal.com
Gotcha, okay thanks!

Re: Film at 11

Date: 30/6/11 00:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
This show was all fake right? Or at least fake much of the time? Like when he kisses the horse he's feeding it something from his mouth.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 18:07 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malakh-abaddon.livejournal.com
Well it is in the bible. Don't ask, it is somewhere in the creation story, about animals. He loves his horsie... lmao.

I once knew a person who married a sheep. It was true love and all.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 19:41 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fizzyland.livejournal.com
"I love ewe!"
Edited Date: 29/6/11 19:41 (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 18:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malakh-abaddon.livejournal.com
That was so baaaadd..

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 19:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
Yeah, that reminds me of a bad Navy joke:

"Why are there Marines on an aircraft carrier?"

"Because sheep would be too obvious"

BOOM!!!!!!!!!!!

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 20:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Quit trying to pull the wool over everybody's eyes here.

(no subject)

Date: 1/7/11 01:37 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malakh-abaddon.livejournal.com
I thought the joke was...

"Why do they use powder soap on a navel vessel (or prison)...?"
"Because it takes longer to pick up."

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 17:05 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
Holy shit. I understand almost every point you are makingbin this post.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 18:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kylinrouge.livejournal.com
eh oh el, her argument is that marriages result in stable relationships for the rearing of children? Tell that to our divorce rate.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 00:59 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
It's a good argument that easily extends to same sex couples.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 18:58 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
I think any claim by Evangelicals to treat marriage as divinely sanctioned can be answered by pointing out how high the divorce rate among Evangelicals is. The idea that heterosexuals respect marriage is akin to believing in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 22:43 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prog-expat.livejournal.com
"The idea that heterosexuals respect marriage is akin to believing in the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus."

...or Creationism.

Re: I happen to know...

Date: 30/6/11 11:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] allhatnocattle.livejournal.com
no... marriage is not a relationship. Marriage is a contract. Husband and wife is the relationship.

Relationships are described as... son, daughter, mother, cousin, partner, spouse, friend, uncle, boss, employee, etc.

Marriage is a contract, just as lease is a contract. Some might argue it's a purchase contract, or it's an investment or an insurance contract.

(no subject)

Date: 29/6/11 22:02 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Her mission is to preserve the moldy language of rabid bigotry in order to protect a heritage that does not suit her land of origin.

How is this hypocrisy? Are we not allowed to have our own opinions on things, we have to slavishly follow our "heritage" or "culture"?

Re: It is hipocrisy...

Date: 30/6/11 01:04 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
You're not making much sense, and also trying to use a double-meaning in a weird way in order to come to your inane conclusion.

Re: It is hipocrisy...

Date: 30/6/11 17:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
Using a word that means something in a context where it doesn't mean that is deliberate miscommunication and equivalent to fraud.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 00:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
Image

^Ask that guy, he might be able to tell you. :-).

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 01:00 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
I often wonder if this guy knows he is internet famous.

(no subject)

Date: 30/6/11 12:44 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com
By the way, did you mean to use the past-tense form of "practice?".

Credits & Style Info

Talk Politics.

A place to discuss politics without egomaniacal mods


MONTHLY TOPIC:

Failed States

DAILY QUOTE:
"Someone's selling Greenland now?" (asthfghl)
"Yes get your bids in quick!" (oportet)
"Let me get my Bid Coins and I'll be there in a minute." (asthfghl)

June 2025

M T W T F S S
       1
2 34 5 678
910 1112 131415
1617 1819 202122
23242526272829
30