[identity profile] enders-shadow.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] talkpolitics
So, slightly more serious than my last post:

Here is an attack ad that is airing with regards to the special election in CA-36



I must say: WHAT THE FLYING FUCK??

I understand that in many elections people vote AGAINST a candidate and not FOR a candidate, but holy fucking shit. This is what people want their political discourse to consist of?

Aside from making shit up, the ad is sexist and racist. It's playing off the very worst in humanity. It's playing off prejudice and fear. And if their message was so totally honest, why wouldn't it be backed by the candidate. Oh right, the above video is a shit-show that no candidate would want anywhere near their name.

So, do you think the republican in this race should repudiate the ad?
Should the people who put this ad out feel shame and remorse for being such terrible people?
Am I being overly PC when I claim the video is sexist and racist?

What are your thoughts, oh great hivemind of the interwebs?


(and for some levity, i wish there were more political ads that went something like this)
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 19:51 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adrunkencadence.livejournal.com
It seems like the tall skinny guy has a look of exasperation tinged with pure embarrassment throughout the video. It's like a coded message; "I can't believe I'm doing this. I can't believe white people are this stupid. The pay was OK."

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 19:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 19:18 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com
This is a joke right? Please tell me this is some elaborate prank. Please

Just in case:

1. Yes

2. hell yes. What could they have possibly been thinking?

3. NO. I spent the last minute of that video with my mouth hanging open. I could not believe what I was watching.

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 19:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahnmut.livejournal.com
Pretty shitty stuff. Bad "rap" (if I can call it so at all), bad animation, bad idea, etc. You mean people actually put and watch that on TV?

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 21:55 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
If it was on TV at all, it likely would have been at 3a with all the other crap advertising.

Mmmm, Danish!

Date: 15/6/11 19:30 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] abomvubuso.livejournal.com
That second ad is stunning! :D

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 19:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malasadas.livejournal.com
I'm sorry, but I refuse to believe that anyone agreed to write, act in, produce or air this in any medium whatsoever -- as a result, my brain has replaced the entire video with pictures of fluffy kittens.

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 20:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vnsplshr.livejournal.com
Looks like this discussion and all the web chatter is giving this little group the "viral" they wanted:

"Turn Right USA’s mission is to expose and lampoon the typical politico’s microscopic brain through cutting-edge viral videos with guts and humor!"

http://www.turnrightusa.org/

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 20:19 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com
I doubt this was aired on any television or cable outlet.

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 21:54 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
It might be now though. Free advertising from "news" shows.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] telemann.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 22:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 20:22 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luzribeiro.livejournal.com
Negative/smearing political ads are disgusting, no matter who does it. Period.

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 20:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com
That's why consensus has practically forbidden them here. It's considered extremely tasteless and usually backfires on the author (or the one who commissions it) very badly.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 20:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] htpcl.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 20:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 20:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 21:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 21:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 22:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 00:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 15/6/11 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anosognosia.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 03:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 07:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 20:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrbogey.livejournal.com
When I say it; I thought it was just a troll. Yea, my brain couldn't comprehend what I was seeing.

I see it as more offensive to good sense than racist or sexist.
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
http://www.hahnshomeboyz.org/
Edited Date: 15/6/11 20:28 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
I wonder if these people so outraged with this approach know how many peace bribes go to the taliban?

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 21:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foreverbeach.livejournal.com
Best political ad ever!

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 21:24 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] caerfrli.livejournal.com
anti-semitic, too judging by the end montage. Pity Huckabee, enabler of rapists and cop killers, decided not to run

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 21:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com
http://kingshamus.wordpress.com/2011/06/14/janice-hahn-sucks-and-heres-why/

So, where is the "making shit up" part? And it's not backed by the candidate because it's some person making a video. Why would it need to be backed by the candidate? In addition, campaign laws encourage it not to be, so that's a strawman on your part.

As for the content of the video, it's piss-poor, sure, but it certainly seems to be effective at getting people to watch it.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 07:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 15/6/11 23:52 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com
Should we use ex-cons to work with youth to combat gangs?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 07:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] yes-justice.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] blue-mangos.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gunslnger.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 07:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-rukh.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] stewstewstewdio.livejournal.com - Date: 16/6/11 02:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

Date: 16/6/11 02:12 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anfalicious.livejournal.com
ROFL

The "suck it" bit at the end is classic.

(no subject)

Date: 16/6/11 02:31 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] raichu100.livejournal.com
...that was an actual political ad? It seems more like a poor-quality, tasteless vid put together by someone extremely bored and uploaded to You Tube for the stupid lulz...

(no subject)

Date: 16/6/11 03:09 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com


I kind of like this one.

(no subject)

Date: 17/6/11 04:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malakh-abaddon.livejournal.com
Um.... Ok.... Yeah, I think... ~shakes head~ Wow, that is pretty screwed up...

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] root-fu.livejournal.com - Date: 17/6/11 06:26 (UTC) - Expand

Credits & Style Info

Monthly topic:
Post-Truth Politics Revisited

Dailyquote:
"The NATO charter clearly says that any attack on a NATO member shall be treated, by all members, as an attack against all. So that means that, if we attack Greenland, we'll be obligated to go to war against ... ourselves! Gee, that's scary. You really don't want to go to war with the United States. They're insane!"

May 2026

M T W T F S S
     1 23
4567 8910
11 121314 1516 17
1819 2021222324
25262728293031